Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

How the Tuivasa-Sheck experiment could have succeeded for NZR and the All Blacks

(Photo by Joe Allison/Getty Images and Visionhaus/Gary Prior via Getty)

The investment by New Zealand Rugby in rugby league superstar Roger Tuivasa-Sheck was worth the gamble, but like anything with risk, was not guaranteed to pay off.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Tuivasa-Sheck’s union career is finally over and the dust settles, hindsight will reveal the missteps along the way that wasted one of the NRL’s great talents.

He came over at 28 years old, three seasons removed from being named the NRL’s best player after winning the Dally M medal, with enough in the tank to make something of it.

The most logical reason why this switch didn’t reach great heights was the preference to turn the rugby league fullback into a union midfielder, and specifically a second five-eighth, which wasn’t his most suited position.

That sole decision nullified Tuivasa-Sheck’s best asset, his deadly step which has seen many defenders fall victim too in the NRL.

In the 13-man code ‘Roger the Dodger’ has the extra space to work his magic between anyone. With two markers and a fullback, league defensive lines are down to 10 men where in union they are typically up to 14 in general play.

With 10 metres of space to wind up, Tuivasa-Sheck is operating in a dreamland of open pasture in the NRL. The midfield in union does not have anywhere near that level of space, nor time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Defensive line speed in union is nothing like Tuivasa-Sheck has experienced before at the pro level.

In the NRL the defensive line is forced to continually retreat through a set and when the backs get the ball late in the count, the line is essentially stationary under fatigue.

In union the short lineout packages beef up opposition defensive lines with loose forwards in the midfield channels. Even with a full lineout, the 10-12 channel is a heavily guarded place. The line is fresh and can fly up and take away time and space.

The No 12 is often carrying to find gain line to create front foot ball for the next phase. Tuivasa-Sheck was effectively asked to perform a similar role to a rugby league prop.

ADVERTISEMENT

If NZR wanted a No 12 that generates gain line, they would have been better off retaining Ngani Laumape.

The other positional challenge was the defensive load. As a fullback in the NRL he was not used to defending in the front line.

Moving to the midfield in union put Tuivasa-Sheck under a heavier load that increased the difficulty of the transition.

However, to make the most of Tuivasa-Sheck’s best asset, his footwork, a position in the back three was necessary for the fleet-footed star to find the space to move.

He needed to become a fullback to have the ball on kick returns against broken kick-chase lines, where there is space to line up mismatches and break ankles.

On the right wing he would have been able to use footwork to beat the last man, still link up on counter-attacks from the backfield or be put into the open field by the men inside him.

But for that, he needed to also possess a long kicking game, to relieve pressure in exit situations where the option to run is not on.

This is where the three years of development time should have been invested into, honing his kicking skills in order to become a back three player.

The comparable player with the blueprint for the ‘best case’ outcome for the transition is right wing Cheslin Kolbe, who is by no means a league player but has world-class footwork.

Perhaps the price tag for Tuivasa-Sheck forced NZR into thinking they needed to get more bang for their buck, deciding that the move would only suffice if he was a midfielder.

That mistake failed to recognise what having a game-changing weapon on the edge can do. Jonah Lomu was, after all, a left wing.

The All Blacks own success with Nehe Milner-Skudder as a right wing in 2015 showed how to maximise a stepping talent in union.

The former Canterbury Bulldogs U20 league player made it as a fullback for the Hurricanes and was a devastating right wing for the All Blacks.

That Tuivasa-Sheck wasn’t tried as a fullback and right winger is the biggest reason why he failed to start more Tests for the All Blacks.

There is still no shortage of options at No 14 for the All Blacks in Sevu Reece, Mark Telea, and Will Jordan.

However, if Tuivasa-Sheck had been given the No 14 jersey at the Blues when he arrived it would have denied Telea the opportunity to play at Super level and become an All Black himself.

It would have been Tuivasa-Sheck starting for the All Blacks on the end-of-year tour instead of Telea.

With Sevu Reece succumbing to a season-ending ACL injury this year and Telea out of picture, Tuivasa-Sheck would have a much better chance of heading to the World Cup.

His fortunes with the All Blacks could have been vastly different if they took a different path with his development, and the fans would have seen more of his talent shine.

At the end of the day there wasn’t a definite need for Tuivasa-Sheck for NZR, as proven by the players who have filled his role since.

But it still could’ve worked out better than it has for both parties.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
N
Nickers 583 days ago

I've been saying this since he switched. Could have been a bigger version of NMS. Waste of a generational talent. The two previous highest profile code swaps were both at 12 - Benji Marshall and Sam Burgess. SBW played on the wing for years before moving into the midfield.

e
edward 584 days ago

he played as a center at schoolboy level but as Smith points out, the defensive lines are far more difficult at pro-level. It was likely a confluence of factors that put him at 12 - his school experience, the Blues over-abundance of wings and lack of centers AND the success of SBW as a 12...all terrible reasons to play someone in that position

C
Chris 584 days ago

Rts was a good league player. He was the 5th best full back at the time he left.
He wouldn't of played origin if he was an Aussie.
He wasn't an elite league player, he was never going to be an elite rugby player. He got a shot at the abs after every other option got injured, but was so far off the mark the opted to move other players into the position.

Great result for the warriors is the have saved themselves a crap load of salary cap, as they were overpaying before

A
Andrew 584 days ago

Plus....he went to the Blues for his development, failing to recognise that theyd failed with Benji Marshall and how it was the Crusaders and Chiefs where hed
have had the greatest chance to succeed

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search