Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Two drop goals, two absurd referee calls, Wales too good

Australia captain Michael Hooper remonstrates with referee Romain Poite in the Wallabies' World Cup match with Wales. (Photo by Dan Mullan / Getty Images)

There was plenty of debate heading into Wales’ Rugby World Cup match with Australia over who was the favourite to take out the game, but there’ll be no questions now over who is more likely to take home the William Webb Ellis Cup home come November.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was a dominant display from the Red Dragons, right from kick-off, with Dan Biggar nailing a drop goal within a minute of kick-off – setting a World Cup record.

Once again, however, refereeing decisions came under much scrutiny from players, commentators and fans alike.

Entering the second quarter, a late tackle by Michael Hooper on Biggar was given a second look by referee Romain Poite and the TMO.

Continued below…

Video Spacer

Hooper had plenty of time to back out of the tackle and also led with his shoulder, but it was only the first issue that the referees focussed on. Ultimately, Poite felt a penalty against the Wallabies was sufficient punishment for Hooper’s hit – something which Hooper seemed bemused by.

Fans certainly thought a yellow card was warranted and took to Twiter to vent their frustrations:

Minutes later, Hooper played an integral role in Australia’s first try of the match, winning a penalty for his side at the breakdown from which the Wallabies were able to launch a scything attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

Shortly after, Adam Ashley-Cooper became the oldest Australian to dot down at a World Cup, latching onto a pinpoint kick from flyhalf Bernard Foley.

Five minutes before half time, another refereeing call left many perplexed.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B2_TBMKgsau/

Wallabies midfield blockbuster, Samu Kerevi, was penalised for defending himself with a raised fist when charging forward with the ball into Rhys Patchell. Patchell had only recently entered the fray after Biggar left the field for an HIA.

Hooper criticised Patchell for his upright tackling technique, but Poite was not especially interested.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first half ended 23-8 in Wales’ favour, courtesy of tries to Hadleigh Parkes and Gareth Davies.

A second drop goal – this time to Patchell, who had stayed on the field as a permanent replacement for Biggar – built Wales’ advantage further, and ensured that even a late fightback wasn’t enough for the Wallabies to take the game.

First Dane Haylett-Petty and Hooper dotted down, then flyhalf replacement Matt To’omua nailed a straightforward penalty – but that was to be Australia’s final points of the game.

Come the 80th minute, Wales stood tall as victors, 29-25.

It was a heroic effort from Wales and will likely give them a somewhat easier path to the finals – but the game will almost certainly be talked about for all the wrong reasons, an issue which has marred this World Cup to date.

Wallaby Reece Hodge was absent from the match, thanks to a three-week ban – but fans aren’t buying his excuses:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search