Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Two England changes for World U20 Championship final versus France

By Liam Heagney
Finn Carnduff leads out England for last Sunday's semi-final win over Ireland (Photo by Carl Fourie/World Rugby)

Six Nations champions England have unveiled a team to play France in Friday’s World Rugby U20 Championship in Cape Town that has two changes from last Sunday’s semi-final win over Ireland. Mark Mapletoft’s side demonstrated their ability to squeeze teams in that last four success, holding the Irish scoreless in the second half to win 31-20 after leading 22-20 at the interval.

ADVERTISEMENT

The final has now pitted them against France, an opposition they beat 45-31 in Pau on March 15 to clinch the age-grade Six Nations title. Following on from the Cape Town Stadium success last weekend over the Irish, England have confirmed one change to their starting pack and another to their back line.

Nathan Michelow was an early departure in the semi-final and Kane James, who replaced him at No8, will now start with Arthur Green coming onto the bench to fill the spot that James had. 

Video Spacer

HITS, BUMPS AND HANDOFFS! | The biggest collisions from the U20s World Championships

Video Spacer

HITS, BUMPS AND HANDOFFS! | The biggest collisions from the U20s World Championships

In the backs, the sole alteration comes at midfield where Ben Waghorn has been named at outside centre. Angus Hall, who started the last day, slips to the bench with Toby Cousins missing out as the 23rd man.

Mapletoft said: “The last few days have been a good reminder of the hard work we have all put in to ensuring the development of this group. We are extremely proud to get to the final, but we cannot lose focus of the challenge in front of us. Since beating Ireland we have talked about taking even greater ownership.

Fixture
World Rugby U20 Championship
England U20
21 - 13
Full-time
France U20
All Stats and Data

“We have shown that in abundance in our last few games and it encapsulates what this squad is about. We expect nothing less come Friday. We will approach the game with the same fearlessness and resilience that has been so important to this point. We want to make our family, friends and all England supporters proud.”

France, meanwhile, have changed two of their starting XV for the final following their 55-31 hammering of New Zealand in the semi-final. Left winger Hoani Bosmorin is absent, with his place taken by Xan Mousques, a sub the last day.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the pack, Lino Julien, who started at tighthead against the Baby Blacks, switches to loosehead for the benched Samuel Jean-Christophe, allowing Thomas Duchene to come back at No3.

ENGLAND (vs France, Friday): 1. Asher Opoku-Fordjour, 2. Craig Wright, 3. Afolabi Fasogbon, 4. Joe Bailey, 5. Junior K’poku, 6. Finn Carnduff (capt), 7. Henry Pollock, 8. Kane James; 9. Ollie Allan, 10. Benjamin Coen; 11. Alex Wills, 12. Sean Kerr, 13. Ben Waghorn, 14. Ben Redshaw; 15. Ioan Jones. Reps: 16. James Isaacs, 17. Cameron Miell, 18. James Halliwell, 19. Olamide Sodeke, 20. Arthur Green, 21. Lucas Friday, 22. Josh Bellamy, 23. Angus Hall.

  • Click here to sign up to RugbyPass TV for free live coverage of matches from the 2024 World Rugby U20 Championship in countries that don’t have an exclusive local host broadcaster deal

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 1 hour ago
‘Special’ rivalry renewed: All Blacks ready for another tough Boks clash

I've always respected your opinions as you will remember in the past, and I still do now. I agree with you. However, that doesn't change the truth of what was up to last year's WC. With SA not being part of Super rugby, that competition is getting worse. In time, with SA playing in the URC, the North will bypass the SH. That is not yet the case, but it will be. If SA becomes part of the 6N which I hope not, then it will just make them stronger. That is bad for the SH. The RC is still the best, but decline is evident. I don't see much hope there, other than to add other teams to the RC, but quality competition is needed, and none is left. There is only 2 powerhouses in the south. That's it. Adding more teams doesn't mean adding better competition. Only adds to more games and less rest in a season where players is already playing to much games. That is why the Nation's Cup is such a good idea. It's the only thing that is going to help NZ at this stage not to lose too much of their talent. Like the Wallabies did and still do. The NH is catching up, but they aren't there yet. It's a slow shift, and already happening, For now, the RC is my choice as the best competition. As for the old style tours? I don't agree with that, because of the Nation's Cup starting in 2026. I would say add the Pumas and Cheetahs and Griquas to Super Rugby, when I suggested that, the NZ fans was up in arms as they don't need SA's 2nd hand teams as they called it. That is teams that beat the Bulls, Stormers, Lions and Sharks, but they get seen as 2nd hand. They don't know what is good for them. They don't see how that would better Super rugby, and that is their loss. Not ours. They want to struggle and sulk. They have no one to blame for them going backwards, because just like Australia, they are going backwards. The decline is there.

13 Go to comments
H
Hellhound 2 hours ago
‘Special’ rivalry renewed: All Blacks ready for another tough Boks clash

There is only 2 teams in the 6N the past few years, just like the RC and they got 2 more teams in the 6N than in the RC. Again another 3 out of 4 RC SH teams made it to the semi finals of the WC. That is a clear indication of which competition is tougher. Yes, NZ have won it continuesly, because SA is using the RC to build to the next WC. The RC wasn't a priority. The Wallabies have been going backwards but Argentina has been growing. Still very inconsistent, but better since they eliminated the eligibility rules and following SA, allowing their players to grow overseas, while still earning good money. Scotland is the Argentina of the 6N. Wales is completely useless and Italy is still very very far away from being real competition although they have become better, or as some claim, the other teams just became less quality. (A sentiment I don't agree with). England is up and down, always threatening but nothing special and very beatable. Only one 6N team won a WC. That is England, currently seen as the 3rd best team in the NH. Once again, only England made it into the semis of the WC of the NH teams. It doesn't matter what the draw was like, or who they played. To be the best, and to win a WC, you have to be able to beat whoever is in front of you, especially in the knockouts. The NH teams aka the 6N teams all failed to reach the WC final. So with that information at hand, which competition is tougher? Harder? The strongest competitors? Which competition is preparing players better? It is the RC. 3 of the RC teams is regular WC semifinalists. The 6N is not the better competition. The RC is. You can dispute the facts as much as you would like, it doesn't change that the WC only proves where the most growth is. The 6N and RC is breeding the next generation of stars and it is clear on that front the RC is the best competition. SA joined the NH and the URC is quickly becoming a powerhouse competition, already the difference is apparent. The growth is immense. The SH is the giants, currently asleep or in SA case, half awake. Beating others without having to struggle to much with resistance here and there. The RC is the best competition.

13 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The 'freak' Wallaby Aaron Smith says gave All Blacks 'nightmares' The 'freak' Wallaby who gave All Blacks 'nightmares'
Search