Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Two nations could join Rugby Championship in wake of Nations Championship failure

Malgene Ilaua looks to hold off the tackle from Fiji's Metuisela Talebula during a test in Vannes, France in 2016. (Photo by Charlie Crowhurst/Getty Images)

The Rugby Championship could be expanded to accomodate tier two nations Fiji and Japan after World Rugby scrapped plans to introduce a global Nations Championship tournament earlier this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Nations Championship was scheduled to begin in 2022, and would have taken place in in the traditional test windows – during the Six Nations in February and March, mid-year tests in July, Rugby Championship in August and September, and end-of-year tests in November.

The top two teams would then have met at the end of the year in a grand final at a neutral venue.

Introducing the multi-layered, promotion-relegation tournament would have secured participating unions millions of dollars in revenue.

As a result, cash-strapped nations in the southern hemisphere were interested in the proposal, but traction to bring the concept to fruition fell short following resistance from some northern hemisphere countries.

New Zealand Rugby chairman Brent Impey has voiced his disappointment at the decision, saying “a golden opportunity to grow the game internationally”.

In the aftermath of the decision, though, Rugby Australia boss Raelene Castle said SANZAAR could now look at expanding the existing Rugby Championship to beyond its current four-team structure.

She hasn’t ruled out the possibility of bringing Japan and Fiji, two sides that were involved in discussions with World Rugby about the Nations Championship proposal, into the competition alongside New Zealand, Australia, South Africa and Argentina.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Certainly what World Rugby Nations Championship has done with this project is allow us to think outside the box about different things, around the calendar, the timing, inclusion of different teams, all of those things,” she said in a conference call on Thursday.

“It’s allowed the SANZAAR nations to think about the expansion of the Rugby Championship, how does that work from a team participation point of view, a commercial sustainability point of view, how does it work to grow the reach of the Rugby Championship, and one of the options is the expansion of the Rugby Championship but no final decision has been made.”

Japan would provide the most financial prosperity of all the involved nations, and shocked the world with a 34-32 victory over the Springboks at the 2015 World Cup in England.

A steady flow of promising results in the ensuing years suggests they have the ability to compete with tier one nations in the long-term future, and their performances at this year’s World Cup, which they are hosting, will be indicative of how competitive have become.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fiji, meanwhile, have long been been shunned from facing quality, tier one opposition on a regular basis, largely for their lack of financial security.

However, many Fijian-born players have gone on to star for other nations, and Fiji themselves have performed above expectation on occasion, with their most notable success coming during the 2007 World Cup, when they beat Wales to qualify for the quarter-finals for the first time in their history.

In other news:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 3 hours ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 3 hours ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’, needing to include even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is one of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of any one clubs amount of players in their International camps, where they rotate in other clubs players through the week (those not chosen in the 23 on Tues/Wed must be rotated out with players from another club for the remaining weeks prep). The number of ‘invisible’ games against a players season tally or predicted workload suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23 were eligible.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season, but ultimately if they don’t want it to change they can just play 11 months in the season instead.

72 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The RugbyPass team of the World Rugby U20 Championship The RugbyPass team of the World Rugby U20 Championship