Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Two rule books': Frustration growing over Bulls' non-try as losses pile up for SA teams

(Photo by Bruce White/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Edinburgh scored an important win when held out against a hard-charging Bulls team in their Round Four encounter on Saturday to win 17-10 over the visiting South Africans.

ADVERTISEMENT

The teams scored one try each, but three first-half penalties by Edinburgh’s South African-born, Scottish flyhalf Jaco van der Walt proved to be the difference as Edinburgh captalised on ruck penalties issued quickly from the whistle of Ben Whitehouse. An early Henry Immelman try, the Van der Walt penalties gave the home team a 14-3 lead.

Try as they might, including a Marcell Coetzee try 10 minutes from time, the Bulls just could not close the gap.

Video Spacer

Jake White talks about his plans for injured Johan Goosen

Video Spacer

Jake White talks about his plans for injured Johan Goosen

It looked like wing Madosh Tambwe had scored an incredible try from a Morne Steyn cross-field kick three minutes from time which would have set up a potential tying-conversion for Steyn to square the scores, but referee Ben Whitehouse chalked it off for a double movement after a trip to the TMO.

The TMO’s decision continued the woes of the South African teams in the URC, where each of the four teams have just one win from their first four outings at a win rate of 25 per cent.

They have a combined record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 11 losses in their first season of European rugby where they have been on the road for the first month.

Fans of the South African teams have been very concerned about the officiating in the United Rugby Championship, with the overturning of the Bulls’ try to Tambwe due to a double movement the latest incident to rattle the nerves.

ADVERTISEMENT

The reaction was not muted, with claims the Bulls ‘were scammed’ by ‘daylight robbery’ and concerns over ‘two rule books’, one for the European teams and one for the South African teams.

Writing for Sport24, South African writer Khanyiso Tshwaku described the officiating as ‘wonky’ that enabled Edinburgh to get control of the match and take advantage of those situations.

“That the hosts were deserving winners shouldn’t be disputed, especially with how the game unfolded in the second half,” he wrote.

ADVERTISEMENT

“However, the officiating left plenty to be desired and the Bulls will have every reason to feel aggrieved.

“Whitehouse’s officiating allowed Edinburgh to not only get the leg up from a points perspective through Jaco van der Walt’s penalties, but the freedom of the breakdown.

“If the Bulls infringed, a shrill blast would resonate around the ground, but nothing when the hosts were the infringers. The one-eyed officiating forced the Bulls into an enterprising style of rugby that avoided going to the ground.”

The Bulls were hoping to secure their second win of the four-game road trip, after mounting a comeback last week to beat Cardiff.

They had opened their tour with two heavy defeats to Irish teams Leinster and Connacht, going down 31-3 and 34-7.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
E
Ed 1162 days ago

I agree - Whitehouse neutralised the Bulls at every turn, disgraceful - this is just more of the Pro14, local biased UK refs, eg. the try given against the Lions last week when the ref was on the ground on the wrong side of the ruck, the penalty against the Ospreys at the end of the match by the female ref who lost all control of the match, etc. etc. It's a pity because the rugby is top class but with bottom class officiating.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search