Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Stormers coach says SA teams are disadvantaged by Europe's 4G pitches

Warrirors' Kyle Steyn scores a try during a United Rugby Championship match between Glasgow Warriors and DHL Stormers at Scotstoun, on January 08, 2023, in Glasgow, Scotland. (Photo by Craig Williamson/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Stormers forwards coach Rito Hlungwani is of the opinion that his side struggled on Europe’s 4G synthetic pitches in their 17-24 loss to the Glasgow Warriors at Scotstoun Stadium in the United Rugby Championship last Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Stormers are in London as they prepare to face London Irish in the Champions Cup this weekend.

Hlungwani said the 4G fields pose another challenge for South African teams.

“It is very difficult if you are not used to the 4G fields,” Hlungwani said.

“It is much faster and the overseas teams train on those fields every day. To us, it always feels like we are two seconds behind.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“We have to work on how we can adapt to playing on the 4G pitches.

“Everything on that surface is about momentum. It is much faster and we are not using the surface as an excuse for our loss last weekend, they were definitely much better on the day.

“But I do feel the 4G field played a role.”

Hlungwani confirmed that there might be one or two changes to the side that will tackle London Irish this weekend, which could see Suleiman Hartzenberg, Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu, Evan Roos or Ruan Nel make a return.

This as it was confirmed that Leolin Zas returned to South Africa following an injury he picked up on tour.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Losing Zas was tough,” Hlungwani said, adding: “But we have good enough cover and it’s not the end of the world.

“The guys coming back from injury have been training with us this week.

Maybe there can be rotation in a few positions. We are playing in two competitions and you can almost expect we will retain the bulk of the team. But in certain positions, there might be rotation with players like Sacha, Evan or Ruan coming in.

“We don’t like making more than seven changes and we are happy with the capacity of players we have with us.

“There was a big change in the way we could prepare this week compared to previous weeks. We definitely had more time to train,” the coach said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Talking about what what went wrong in Glasgow last weekend, Hlungwani said their systems are very similar to that of the Cheetahs when Franco Smith coached them. “Yet, now he has more experienced players. They were very good at stopping the maul and they have a lot of x-factor players.

“Our ability to maul was a big disappointment last week. We had more mauling opportunities than others, but we were poor in that area of the game. It was all on us, we were not good enough. Teams know if they come into our 22, we will maul.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search