Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Unacceptable from Munster. They should be embarassed'

Oli Jager of Munster (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Munster legend Donncha O’Callaghan has blasted his former team following their shock to defeat to minnows Zebre Parma in Round 2 of the URC.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Italians recorded a famous 42-33 bonus point victory over Munster Rugby, their first-ever win over the Irish province.

Munster led 28-15 at halftime, with two tries from Gavin Coombes, but Zebre mounted a second-half comeback. Jacopo Trulla, Alessandro Fusco, Giovanni Licata, and Geronimo Prisciantelli all scored for Zebre, overturning the deficit. A late penalty from Giacomo Da Re sealed the historic win, despite Munster’s late effort from Shay McCarthy.

Speaking on RTE Sport, O’Callaghan was fuming at his former side’s poor showing at the Sergio Lanfranchi Stadium in Parma.

“You don’t want to take away that Zebre were full quality for it but it was totally unacceptable from Munster,” said O’Callaghan.

“Their performance there, both as individuals and as a team, to go on the road, like we know what Zebre are. They were bottom of the league last year. Of course, they have shoots to come about but Munster’s performance there was completely unacceptable.

“Delighted for them [Zebre], as Donal [Lenihan] you mentioned, they are a development team and you want to see them come on. We want a competitive league but maybe I have Munster glasses on. The amount of errors, the amount of poor performances. The individual sloppy mistakes were totally unacceptable. It is great for our league, it’s brilliant to see Zebre coming on but Munster will look back on that and they should be embarrassed by that performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You absolutely have to point the finger at somebody.”

He was also backhandedly complimentary of Zebre.

“What’s great about them [Zebre] is they know their role. They are [there] to develop Italian players. Not only will we see them get better but Italy will get stronger in the Six Nations as a result of them being competitive.”

The retired second row described Munster’s breakdown “as disgraceful”.

“For [Oli] Jager and [Jeremy] Loughman – two internationals – to be caught at a ruck by a fourth-choice Italian nine is nowhere good enough. I know we have to respect opposition but I can promise you as the first pillar at those breakdowns, from under 18s level you practice that and make sure you’re on message.

“You do your job right when you’re in the right positions. You can’t coach a pillar to do his job. He should know that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Munster head coach Graham Rowntree said after the game that: “Zebre are playing very good rugby. They like to run the ball from everywhere. We’ve got to be smart about where we play the game.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
E
Ed the Duck 83 days ago

More contradictory arrogant phish from a Munster muppet!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 54 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search