Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Until the All Blacks are actually put under pressure, we've got no idea if they are any good

Caleb Clarke, Beauden Barrett and Sam Cane of the All Blacks celebrate with the Bledisloe Cup after winning the 2020 Tri-Nations and Bledisloe Cup match between the Australian Wallabies and the New Zealand All Blacks at ANZ Stadium on October 31, 2020 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

It’s not the All Blacks’ fault that South Africa are sitting out The Rugby Championship.

Nor are they to blame Argentina’s shambolic preparation or the ineptitude of Australia’s performance on Saturday night.

But those things do mean we have to reserve judgement on anything this New Zealand team does in 2020.

The Wallabies were pathetic, in losing 43-5 to the All Blacks at ANZ Stadium.

Comparisons have inevitably been drawn between this game and the 1996 clash between the two countries at Athletic Park, where New Zealand were 43-6 victors. The truth is those two matches bear little resemblance because of the sad decline in the standard of Australian rugby.

Maybe we were fools to ourselves after last month’s 16-16 draw at Sky Stadium. Maybe we wanted some competition so badly and wanted to believe in Dave Rennie and wanted Ian Foster to face a bit of scrutiny that we completely overplayed Australia’s performance..

Maybe it was just a rusty day out for the All Blacks. Maybe if Rieko Ioane put the ball down properly then they’d have kicked away and won by plenty. Maybe the Wallabies are only any good when expectations are at an all-time low.

Whatever the case, the task Rennie faces as Australia coach remains a massive one. The Wallabies lack smarts and skills and grunt and their depth borders on non-existent.

Will they be competitive occasionally? Sure. But they’re a long way off finding the consistency required to regularly excel at international level.

After Wellington, I wrote that they could. In hindsight, I’ll have to admit I was wrong.

None of which tells us much about the All Blacks.

We don’t really fo short-termism in New Zealand. We’re always thinking in Rugby World Cup cycles and always trying to determine a team’s place in history.

We’re looking for greatness and confirmation that a squad and a coaching group does or doesn’t have that in them. All Blacks teams aren’t judged week-to-week, but against how they compare with all those who’ve gone before them.

We haven’t a clue about this New Zealand side. And we won’t for a while yet, either.

Without any actual opposition to gauge these guys against, there’s nothing that can be said about this team or the quality of their coaches.

South Africa, England, France and Ireland are the benchmark sides and sadly none are on the itinerary right now.

You have to admire SA Rugby. There aren’t many governing bodies who wouldn’t put money ahead of player welfare or legacy.

A Springboks’ side could’ve been cobbled together and could’ve been dispatched to Australia but, in the circumstances, it wouldn’t have performed a lot better than the Wallabies have.

As for the All Blacks well, without wanting to labour the point too much, we’re still little the wiser.

I’m not convinced about their props, blindside flanker is up for grabs, captain Sam Cane remains susceptible to head knocks, Richie Mo’unga hasn’t established himself at 10, Jack Goodhue is having an underwhelming year and Jordie Barrett isn’t a wing.

I get that Mo’unga collected a big haul of points in Bledisloe III, but I go back to the question of who was he actually playing against? Put Beauden Barrett at first five-eighth in Sydney and he’d have carved Australia up too.

The reason we all got carried away after Wellington was because we’d seen a contest. Weeks on, people still talk about how much they enjoyed that test.

Saturday in Sydney was momentarily entertaining, but it was never a contest. The only interest was in seeing how clinical the All Blacks could be.

New Zealand’s netball team have just completed a 3-0 series win over England. The second test was by far the most enjoyable, because New Zealand’s flaws were first exposed and then exploited.

As the good teams do, the Silver Ferns adjusted and responded and went on to win 54-47. The margins of victory might’ve been larger in each of the other matches, but neither performance was as impressive as that one.

This All Blacks team has its flaws too. Flaws that, at this rate, won’t be exposed until we’re another year through the world cup cycle.

People can wax lyrical about these players, they can praise Foster and his staff. But until we see them all put under pressure, we’ve got no idea if they’re actually any good.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search