Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Updated world rankings show big divide ahead of Rugby World Cup draw

Cobus Reinach of South Africa celebrates scoring his try with Jesse Kriel during the Autumn Nations Series 2025 rugby test match between France and South Africa (Springboks) at Stade de France on November 8, 2025 in Saint-Denis near Paris, France. (Photo by Jean Catuffe/Getty Images)

After this weekend’s breathless set of Quilter Nations Series matches, it will now take something special from the sides outside of the top six in the rankings to break into Band 1 for the Rugby World Cup 2027 draw on 3 December.

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Rugby Rankings will show a widening gap between those teams and the chasing pack when they are officially updated at noon on Monday.

Argentina’s record 52-28 win over Wales at the Principality Stadium has cemented their place in sixth, with their nearest challengers Australia even further off the pace. The top six teams at the conclusion of the Quilter Nations Series will be in Band 1, with sides ranked seventh to 12th in Band 2.

Los Pumas’ victory combined with the Wallabies’ loss to Italy in Udine sees the sides separated by 2.61 points, while Scotland, who are eighth, are nearly half a point further in arrears.

As Australia have the uneviable task of travelling to Ireland and France in their remaining two November fixtures, Scotland probably have the better chance of stealing their way into the top six at Argentina’s expense.

Scotland are at home to the Pumas next weekend in a game that could see a big momentum shift towards Gregor Townsend’s team if they win. Even then, though, the points reward might not be enough, as Scotland won’t get any points if they beat Tonga in their fourth and final November fixture to improve their rating further, while Argentina head to Allianz Stadium to take on England.

At the top, South Africa’s lead over the All Blacks has increased to 1.71 points, with their epic 14-man win over France in Paris worth half a point more than the All Blacks’ hard-fought 25-17 victory against Scotland.

Ireland and England remain in third and fourth, after wins over Japan and Fiji, and France are still fifth.

Wales hold on to 12th, the last of the places in Band 2, but their position is under threat from Japan, who they meet in another winner-takes-all contest in Cardiff next weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

With 0.48 points knocked off their rating for Sunday’s defeat at the hands of Argentina, they are now just 0.32 points above Brave Blossoms in 13th.

Outside of the race to get into  the top two bands, Uruguay were the biggest movers in the rankings, with Los Teros projected to climb four places to 15th as a result of their 26-8 victory against Portugal.

How the updated World Rugby Rankings will look on Monday:

1 South Africa 93.06 (+0.86)
2 New Zealand 91.35 (+0.36)
3 Ireland 88.85 (no change)
4 England 88.06 (+0.02)
5 France 86.95 (-0.86)
6 Argentina 84.30 (+0.48)
—–
7 Australia 81.69 (-1.21)
8 Scotland 81.21 (-0.36)
9 Fiji 81.15 (-0.02)
10 Italy 78.98 (+1.21)
11 Georgia 73.69 (no change)
12 Wales 73.57 (-0.48)
—–
13 Japan 73.25 (no change)

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

59 Comments
D
Dave Didley 72 days ago

The weather, the late kick off, the sluggish form of both teams. That game had 12-9 written all over it.


It was an unexpected belter! Wallabies only dropped off the last 15. First half was high quality.


Agree fully on the Mack. Has the physique of a PE teacher but he can skin the best of them.

r
rJ 77 days ago

The rankings will a,ways ref,etc the countries with bjg playing numbers due to the deeply unfair 8 subs rule. Hiw many countries can bring on a new lack kf similair standards to the starting? Four.

No mire tiddlers like Wales, and Ireland upsettingly the odds.

C
CH 76 days ago

What? 🤷🏼‍♂️

D
Dave Didley 79 days ago

I’m sure it will make more sense once the actual draw takes place, but it’s entirely possible that the 1/4’s could be more frontloaded than ever.


Our current 1st and 2nd ranked teams could progress through their routine round of 16 fixtures only to face each other in a 1/4 final? Both - potentially - as pool winners?


It’s starting to make my head hurt but it seems that the order you are picked (randomly) from your banding is as important as what actual band you are in?


A team currently ranked 7th/8th and has 2 years to find a bit of form, could have a spectacular tournament!

J
JW 78 days ago

What makes you say that?


It’s certainly not a progressive system, where theres a definable (and stepped) increase in difficulty as it goes. You would need the number of pools to either match round of 16 (8), or quarters (4) to have the idea of succinct favourites.


Of course it is just an “idea”. These bands and formats don’t change the ability of the teams at all. Are you worried about being knocked out in the quarters again despite being a rank 4 team? Don’t worry, by the time it rolls around you’re more likely to be a rank 8 team with the underdog tag coming up against a top 3.


Or you could get lucky. I looked the draw long enough to noticed two things, QF1 is pool A winner v pool B winner, and the round of 16 has matchups between runners up and 3rd place getters, so Ireland could at least be guarenteed of getting to the QFs if they come up against a team like Romania.

L
LS 79 days ago

As a South African I’m humbly optimistic that the Boks just might make it a 5th RWC, 3 ih a row the way they playing now. But 2yrs is a long time in rugby. I’m 61yrs old, and I have seen a few excellent Bok teams in my life time, but this team is something else, they are in a class of their own. So porud, we need this in our country, politics have destroyed it and rugby is the only positive thing left and it’s uniting us as a a nation.

J
JW 78 days ago

You mean it’s always been “destroyed”, or hindered by politics LS.


It would be more accurately to say “now we are trying to sort out our politics a high profile together rugby side, continually getting better the more they are integrated racially, will help lead the way for the country’s industry and politics as well”.

G
GeelGat 78 days ago

I think the Boks look strong now because the current All Blacks are well below that of past teams from New Zealand. The team to watch out for in future is from Argentina. They play an exciting brand of rugby and just keep getting better and better.

T
TokoRFC 79 days ago

The Rugby world ranking aren’t perfect but after this weekend South Africa deserve to be well and truly on top, that was a remarkable performance - From a kiwi

C
CC 79 days ago

Over the weekend l watched Fiji as well wow!! What can l say though they didn’t Win but one can see they’re the team to be watched

L
LS 79 days ago

How’s Tonga doing lately, have’t seen them playing for a long time now?

C
CC 79 days ago

What a phenomenal performance displayed by almighty Springbok they really showed they meant business, playing like really world champions! Well done Bokke

F
Frans 79 days ago

So Pool A, B, C and D will have the third place finishers in the round of 16, and then probably the pool winners in the Quarters, whereas Pool E and F winners will have probably a tougher match in the round of 16 against runners up, but then a bit easier in the Quarters against pool runners up again. It does not really matter too much - you have to beat the best teams in the world in order to win the WC, wether you meet them in the round of 16 or the final

J
JW 78 days ago

Who didn’t love the last WCs QF weekend aye?


You mean the pool winners play the third place? It was a blurry image but I thought I saw a ro16 game where it said runnersup play a wildcard team.

H
Hammer Head 79 days ago

Based on the comments below I’m even more convinced that nobody knows how the World Cup draw is going to work.

H
Hammer Head 79 days ago

Okay. I asked ChatGPT. I’m clear now.

J
JW 79 days ago

+0.02 for beating a team 5 places below you? Seems odd.


Essentially Argentina need to lose both games to miss out?

C
CN 79 days ago

Why is it for Round of 16, that the only time a winner of their pool A plays against another winner of their pool B, based on who is 1st & 2nd in the world rankings by 3rd December. No other round of 16 match pits winner of pool against winner of pool. IE all others are winner v runners up / best 3rd.

This so happens to be Pool A winner - Presumably Sth Africa vs Pool B winner, presumably New Zealand, so to take out one of the best highest teams in the world at the QF's doesn’t make sense to perform well? With the other R16’s looking like Fiji V Wales, France V Italy, Australia V Georgia, Argentina V Scotland, Ireland V Uruguay & England V Portugal…

J
JW 79 days ago

The pools are drawn out of a hat. Only thing that dictates them is the bands, 1-6,7-12 etc. You must surely have read something that’s wrong for ro16 too?


Went and had a look at it, and as you’d expect it’s a convoluted draw trying to get 16 teams through. What you are referring to is that pool winners most likely win in the round of 16, and with 6 pool winners, into the quarter finals (8 teams), that obviously means there has to be 2 of the four games where those winners play each other in a qf (as apposed to the normal four pool winners in the quarters). It has the potential to go pear shaped if by chance SA and NZ are the first two countries pulled out of the hat (pools get filled in sequence one country at a time, layer, or bracket, by layer) then they are likely to play each other in a QF, yes. It will actually be random though, rankings are only used for which counties go in the hat at any on time (6 balls at a time, for 4 times, to fill out each layer of the pools).

H
HitchikersPie 79 days ago

You’re missing a trick not talking about the band 3 teams… all those nations are super interested, because if you qualify as the 17th/18th team, you could get a real weak squad in your pool, say Zimbabwe/Hong Kong.


Since the 4 best 3rd place teams qualify for the Round of 16, the points difference available will make a huge difference, and so everyone’s desperately trying to ensure they make it there.


I’ve listed out the possibilities here:


https://bsky.app/profile/hitchikerspie.bsky.social/post/3m5ad3tqmd227

D
Dave Didley 79 days ago

The best any of the 24 teams can now manage in pool play is 15 match PTS. The median average is 7.5 PTS and 12 teams.


Broadly, 8 PTS should get you into the top 12 of standings and guarantee progression to the last 16.


It’s high risk, but there is a strong case for just doing enough and no more in the pools.

A team going 1/3 in their pool could still realistically finish with 6/7 PTS including a couple of bonus PTS. That should still be more than enough to progress.


A bit of luck with which side of the draw they are on and it could work out well for them.

C
Cantab 79 days ago

All this really means is that teams currently ranked 1 to 6 should make the RWC quarters probably joined by Australia & Scotland but Fiji as a possible dark horse.

J
JW 79 days ago

What do you mean? The pools will drawn at random, Aussie could find themselves up against the Boks at home in Ro16.

F
Flankly 79 days ago

It is clear how rankings map to bands, but have they published the mechanism for mapping rankings to actual pools?


For example, do #6 and #7 both end up in Pool F?

C
CC 79 days ago

Yup, what AS says, it's random. Except Aus will be in pool A

https://youtu.be/SXHcRo_NGc0?si=BmmOxxGQrmaR8L9V

A
AS 79 days ago

I believe it’s random. Any team ranked 1-6 can be in the same pool as any team ranked 7-12.

T
TI 79 days ago

The only good thing about all this is, that we can’t get a Wales, Australia, Georgia, Fiji pool for the fourth RWC in a row.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close
ADVERTISEMENT