Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Sharks sign Nyakane and Esterhuizen in sensational double deal

Racing92's South African prop Trevor Nyakane looks on prior to the French Top14 rugby union match between Aviron Bayonnais (Bayonne) and Racing 92 at Stade Jean Dauger in Bayonne, southwestern France on December 30, 2023. (Photo by GAIZKA IROZ / AFP) (Photo by GAIZKA IROZ/AFP via Getty Images)

The Sharks have pulled off a sensational double deal to take World Cup winners centre Andre Esterhuizen and prop Trevor Nyakane to Durban from the start of next season.

ADVERTISEMENT

RugbyPass understands that agreements are in place with inside centre Esterhuizen and tighthead prop Nyakane, who can also operate at loosehead, both members of the Springboks World Cup to join The Sharks.

The Sharks have seen off the Stormers and paid what is believed to be a substantial transfer fee to land Esterhuizen, who was due to be under contract at the Twickenham Stoop for another season.

Video Spacer

TRY or NO TRY – Boks Office discuss Scotland vs France | RPTV

In the latest episode of Boks Office, the guys and special guest Matt Stevens chat about the late drama in the Six Nations clash between Scotland and France. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV now

Watch now

Video Spacer

TRY or NO TRY – Boks Office discuss Scotland vs France | RPTV

In the latest episode of Boks Office, the guys and special guest Matt Stevens chat about the late drama in the Six Nations clash between Scotland and France. Watch the full episode on RugbyPass TV now

Watch now

They turned to Esterhuizen to replace Janse van Rensburg, who has left the club for a short-term deal with Japanese club Canon Eagles before a summer move to Top 14 outfit Bordeaux.

The Sharks first choice, Jan Serfontein, who also had an offer from the Bulls, decided to stay with Montpellier, leaving them scrambling around, but Esterhuizen, who was Quins highest paid player, wouldn’t have been cheap.

The Premiership high flyers were demanding a £500,000 (R12 million) transfer fee, which they were hoping to knock down during a lot of toing and froing over the last week, with wages likely to be equally as high.

Meanwhile, Nyakane was attracting interest from his former club, the Bulls after being told that he won’t be offered another contract by his current employers Racing 92.

ADVERTISEMENT

Nyakane, who is 35 in May, has spent the last three years in Paris, and a formal announcement is expected before the end of the month.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
S
Shaylen 306 days ago

Absolute madness. They shelled out huge money on a 29 year old who isnt that different from van rensburg although he is probably better in every way. No doubt he will give them good go forward but imagine what they could have done with that 12 million. Maybe they could have bought 3 youngsters who are gonna be part of the next gen springboks. Just look at the bulls and their wise purchases. Gumede is now a star and Akker van der Merwe and Co have been adding tremendous depth. One player doesnt win titles, its a team effort. Nyakane is 35 and is probably out of the Bok reckoning. What is the point of that signing? If hes gonna go on to coach then great but give the youngsters a chance

G
Grant 306 days ago

Great signings for the Sharks! 🙌

m
mark 307 days ago

Another big loss for Quins. Seems like the Premiership and the RFU can’t hold onto world class players.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search