Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

USA targeting 80-minute performance against Ireland in WXV 1

LANGLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIA - OCTOBER 05: Keia Mae Sagapolu of the United States is challenged by Teani Feleu and Lina Queyroi of France during the WXV 1 Pool match between USA and France at Langley Events Center on October 05, 2024 in Langley, British Columbia. (Photo by Rich Lam - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Prior to the USA’s final WXV 1 match against Ireland, head coach Sione Fukofuka and Kate Zackary have spoken of the team’s intent to put in an 80-minute performance at BC Place.

ADVERTISEMENT

A key theme running through the discourse around their performances at this competition and further afield has been the burgeoning confidence within the squad as their international matches and time together increase.

“A big part was building combinations and confidence,” Fukofuka said. “We don’t get a lot of time together so the two weeks prior to the England game we worked pretty hard to push through our content but also a lot of our physical development through that period. The players that have started each game allow us to start the game in the manner that we want to.

Video Spacer

‘This Energy Never Stops’ – Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025

Video Spacer

‘This Energy Never Stops’ – Women’s Rugby World Cup 2025

“Strong set piece, really big ball carries, and compete hard at that collision area. We feel that the extra week together allows those combinations to get even stronger. As you saw against France, we competed really well but we also are pretty excited about what our reserves, our bomb squad, can add to that level. Clearly the platform is laid by the starting group.”

The USA will have played nine Test matches this year at the completion of WXV, starting with a match against South Africa in London in March, finishing third at the Pacific Four series after playing Canada, New Zealand, and Australia, facing Japan twice in August, and rounding off the year at WXV 1.

Captain Zackary discussed what a marker of success would be from the final WXV 1 match to finish off the year: “A key thing is a lot of confidence across our team. We’ve still got a couple of players who are only in single-digit caps, we’ve got players who are higher up, we’ve got a whole range.

“The biggest thing is we’re ending out the year on a high with a huge four-week block together. Like Sione said, we’ve been building and preparing for the last four weeks so I think that marker of success is really about rounding out a really big year.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s not just this tournament, we started back in January with the camp and then we’ve played South Africa, we’ve had PAC 4, we’ve had this event, we’ve played Japan. It’s been a massive year as a team and I think the biggest thing is that we’ve seen the growth all the way from day one through to here.

“There’s been a really massive growth among the team and so those markers are just about the individual confidence and secondly probably around our set piece. Obviously, I’m a bit more on the forward mindset and one or two takeaways just some of our lineout success and our scrum success that we haven’t had traditionally.”

The growth in the squad has been nurtured through increased periods of time in camp. Fukofuka explained the desire to compete for a full 80 minutes in this weekend’s fixture.

The head coach said: “In our practice, if you see where we are this week compared to where we were three weeks ago, it’s chalk and cheese. The professionalism and the accuracy that is on display at the moment is so pleasing. That comes with time together and the opportunity to work in this environment. Through the games, we competed against England for long periods of time but clearly there were periods there where they were able to get momentum and I thought they did that really well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

“I thought against France we were much better. Reviewing the game we felt we didn’t take opportunities at the start that could have changed the shape of the game which was disappointing but at the same time, kept ourselves competitive.

“That ten minutes after half-time was a bit disappointing when we allowed them to get that jump and extend the lead, but we were so happy with how we finished the game. Clearly some of our bomb squad members came off the bench and added real impact, but then our starters also kept pushing for that 80 minutes.

“This week what we’re looking for is a collective effort from minute one through to minute 80. We know with Ireland’s confidence that that’s what it’s going to take. We’re pretty excited about it and we’ve loaded accordingly. This is a deload week for us where we’d planned to pull back within our practice to be as fresh as we can do we do get those 80 minutes.”

One area of improvement from the game against France, which finished 14-22, was the penalty count. It reached a total of 14 for the USA, 10 of which were conceded in the first half.

“We’ve been pretty cognisant that when we have the ball in particular we control a lot of our own destiny, so making sure that we have support around the ball, making sure we remove the threats,” Fukofuka explained.

Related

“You would have seen that last 25 minutes, I don’t think we gave away another penalty. We have it in us to adjust our behaviours, we just took a little bit more time to adjust to the referee than we should have and we allowed to France to put us under pressure. This week, more of the same really. We control our own actions and we’re pretty confident that when we do that we can play the style of rugby that we’re chasing.”

The USA have made one change to last week’s starting team, Cassidy Bargell coming into the fold to make her first start. Bargell came onto the field in the 55th minute and marshalled the USA to reduce the deficit to eight points at the final whistle.

Fukofuka said: “It’s not a surprise that in the last 25 minutes when she entered the game, we picked up our pace, our ruck speed was quicker, we had more possession, our penalty rate went down. It’s not all on the back of Cass obviously but she brings a whole lot of energy and a whole lot of speed to the ball. That’s exciting. Her width of pass allows us to play that little bit wider so there’s a whole lot of excitement that comes with her.”

Bargell has fought and continues to battle through bowel disease, and this November will mark three years since her ostomy due to severe acute ulcerative colitis.

“What is so important, and if you know a little bit about her story, is that perseverance to come back what she’s gone through to make her debut at the start of the year, go through the disappointment of not playing as much as she would have wanted to, and then really added to value to our playing group. We’re excited to see her start for the first time,” Fukofuka added with pride.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Stuart Lancaster Racing 92 exit rumours wide of the mark Stuart Lancaster Racing 92 exit rumours wide of the mark
Search