Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Vaea Fifita in doubt for World Cup after mystery injury

Vaea Fifita to the Chiefs? (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

NZ Herald

Vaea Fifita’s dream of making the All Blacks‘ 2019 Rugby World Cup squad is in jeopardy after being a late scratch from Wellington’s Mitre 10 Cup game with a knee injury last night.

Wellington scored their first win of the Mitre 10 Cup rugby season, holding on 23-22 to continue Canterbury’s losing start, but they did it without Fifita, who was a surprise omission with an as-yet unspecified knee complaint.

Fifita was one of nine All Blacks released to play in the Mitre 10 Cup ahead of the All Blacks’ Rugby World Cup squad announcement on Wednesday, and missed out on one final chance to impress in the final push to make the Cup squad.

Fifita is likely up against Liam Squire – if he makes himself available – and Jackson Hemopo for one of the loose forward spots in the 31-man squad, but will now have to hope that he is both fit enough, and has done enough, to be selected.

Without Fifita, Wellington trailed 10-8 at the break but stormed to a 20-10 lead with two tries in the opening four minutes of the second half. Canterbury forced their way back into the match with two tries, the last in the 77th minute from a lineout maul closing the gap to a single point, but could not quite finish the job.

This is unfamiliar territory for the red and blacks, who lost last year’s final to Auckland having won nine of the previous 10 national provincial titles, but have now lost their first three games in 2019, a slump they haven’t suffered the likes of in over 20 years.

They will not get a better opportunity to win next weekend however, hosting a Southland side on a 23-match losing streak.

Wellington 23 (Vince Aso, Du’Plessis Kirifi, Alex Fidow tries; Jackson Garden-Bachop con, 2 pens)
Canterbury 22 (Josh McKay, Mitchell Dunshea, Harry Allan tries; Brett Cameron 2 cons, pen)
HT: 8-10.

This article first appeared on nzherald.co.nz and was republished again with permission.

ADVERTISEMENT

In other news:

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search