Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Vakatawa could return to Test rugby in 2025

Racing's French centre Virimi Vakatawa (L)is comforted by France's national rugby coach team Fabien Galthie after annnouncing he has to stop his career as a rugby player at the age of 30 for medical reasons in Plessis-Robinson, on September 6, 2022. (Photo by FRANCK FIFE / AFP) (Photo by FRANCK FIFE/AFP via Getty Images)

Virimi Vakatawa, the former France centre, could be on the cusp of a remarkable return to the Test arena as early as 2025.

ADVERTISEMENT

Vakatawa’s journey to this potential comeback has been nothing short of extraordinary. In 2022, the rugby world was shocked when it was revealed at a press conference helmed by Fabien Galthie that the exceptional attacking talent had been withdrawn from Test rugby due to a heart condition, a setback that effectively ended his France career.

His future in rugby hung in the balance, with uncertainty shrouding any further involvement in the game for the New Zealand-born winger.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

However, as initially revealed by RugbyPassBristol sign ex France international Virimi Vakatawa, Vakatawa made a triumphant return to international rugby earlier this summer, donning the famous Barbarians jersey in a one-off clash in Brive against Samoa in a Rugby World Cup warm-up.

The fairy tale continued when it was announced this week that Vakatawa had inked a deal with Pat Lam’s Bristol Bears, marking his return to the professional rugby circuit via the Gallagher Premiership a little over a year after it appeared to be all over.

Now, World Rugby’s relatively new regulations have opened an intriguing door for Vakatawa. Under these rules, a player can represent the country of their ancestry provided they haven’t played for the nation they first declared for in three years. Vakatawa’s last appearance for France was in 2022 against Japan, placing him within the eligibility window for Fiji in June 2025.

Related

Should Vakatawa choose to declare for Fiji, and should he be selected, it would be a homecoming of epic proportions and a boon for Fiji’s national team.

ADVERTISEMENT

The question is however: could Vakatawa – who will be 33 in 2025 – make it back into the star-studded Fijian backline that currently includes the likes of Semi Radradra, Josua Tuisova and Waisea Nayacalevu?

Vakatawa <a href=
Gloucester Racing” width=”1920″ height=”1080″ /> Virimi Vakatawa (Photo by Frederic Stevens/Getty Images)

Nayacalevu will be 35 in 2025 while Radradra will be 33, the same age as Vakatawa, so age isn’t exactly on his side but nor does it rule him out.

Any theoretical Vakatawa accession into the team also doesn’t factor in the conveyor belt of talent that the Fijiian rugby has become, with Pacific Super Rugby side Fijian Drua already producing a number of talented and powerful rookies that will be eager to step into the boots left by any departing stars, not to mention the Sevens pathway that continues to develop superstars with crossover potential.

ADVERTISEMENT

Whatever Vakatawa decides in regards to Test rugby, a theoretical stint for the Flying Fijians – if selected – would certainly be a romantic notion for rugby fans.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 32 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search