Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Very uncharacteristic': Barrett's response to Bridge's blunder

(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

All Blacks fullback Jordie Barrett says he isn’t too dismayed by George Bridge’s misfortune under the high ball during Saturday’s victory over the Springboks in Townsville.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett was a pivotal figure in New Zealand’s tense 19-17 win over the Springboks at Queensland Country Bank Stadium as he was cool, calm and collected both off the kicking tee and amid South Africa’s relentless aerial bombardment.

The 24-year-old didn’t miss a kick at goal and slotted the match-winning penalty late on in the piece to give the All Blacks a hard-fought victory over their fierce rivals in their 100th clash against each other.

Video Spacer

The Season – Brisbane Boys College | Episode 6 | Season 8

Video Spacer

The Season – Brisbane Boys College | Episode 6 | Season 8

Barrett’s influence on the outcome extended to his ability under the high ball as he defused the box kicking of Faf de Klerk and Handre Pollard’s bombs time and time again.

As a result, the 31-test international provided the All Blacks with a firm sense of safety in the backfield, but that feeling of security came under threat early on in the match when a spillage from Bridge gifted the Springboks their only try of the test.

De Klerk launched a sky-high box kick from the middle of the park in the sixth minute, which Bridge looked to field from inside his own 22.

However, the 26-year-old wing inexplicably coughed the ball up 10 metres from his own tryline, which allowed Springboks wing Sbu Nkosi to pounce on the loose ball and run in an easy try.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking about the incident on Sunday, Barrett conceded that it was out-of-character of Bridge to drop the ball from a seemingly regulation box kick, but reassured reporters of his teammate’s ability under the high ball.

“It was very uncharacteristic of George,” Barrett said when asked what he said to Bridge after his high-profile error.

“We watch him at training and we watch him every week and he catches everything, literally, and, ironically, I think in that game, a couple of minutes later, he took a near-impossible catch right on the sideline.

“Look, I didn’t say too much to George. I know what he’s capable of, and so does he, and we were just about getting on with what was coming and it didn’t take too long before the ball was back on his head.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We were expecting it, but we’ve still got to be able to deal with it, so we weren’t as good as we would have liked to be as a unit, admittedly, but, like I said earlier, I think we might have taken one or two or enough [high balls] to win the test match in the end.”

Much had been made in the lead-up to the heavyweight bout between the All Blacks and Springboks of South Africa’s incessant kicking strategy that continually looks to put the opposition back three under pressure.

What wasn’t mentioned, though, was the execution of de Klerk’s box kicks, which, according to Barrett in his post-match television interview, wreaked havoc with him, Bridge and fellow outside back Will Jordan.

Barrett told Stan Sport that the variation of spins that de Klerk was putting on the ball with each of his kicks made it difficult to read the ball’s trajectory.

That could, in part, explain Bridge’s mishap, especially as he was backtracking to field the ball, but Barrett said he and his teammates now have time to devise a plan to deal with those various types of kicks after being exposed to them two days ago.

“I have before, just in moderation, obviously,” Barrett said when asked if he had ever faced box kicks like de Klerk’s.

“I’ve never had that many contestable kicks to deal with in a game. It is pretty hard to combat, but it was a challenge I was kind of relishing last night. It was actually pretty exciting. Every time they’d set up for a box kick, I just knew it was a chance to go up and own the space in the air.

“I guess we’ve got to find some ways to combat that because they throw a lot of different scenarios at us. They’re doing it from their attacking 22 and putting it on the head of isolated guys with plenty of chasers, so it can be hard to deal with and, this week, we have plenty of time to come up with a plan.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Clyde 1177 days ago

With Bridge struggling under the high ball in this weekends test match, do you think Fozzie will stick to the back three of last week, or does he bring in Sevu?

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Glasgow coach jumps to defence of McDowall who faces possible huge ban Glasgow coach jumps to defence of McDowall who faces possible huge ban
Search