Édition du Nord

Select Edition

Nord Nord
Sud Sud
Mondial Mondial
Nouvelle Zélande Nouvelle Zélande
France France

Le Racing 92 s’impose à Vannes

Cameron Woki (Racing 92) célèbre avec ses coéquipiers au Stade de la Rabine de Vannes. (Photo de Loic VENANCE / AFP) (Photo by LOIC VENANCE/AFP via Getty Images)

Au terme d’un match accroché et malgré un gros retour en fin de match de Vannes, le Racing 92 s’est imposé de trois points en Bretagne (24-27).

ADVERTISEMENT

Les deux équipes ont inscrit trois essais mais une pénalité a fait la différence pour les Franciliens qui ont sanctionné les erreurs vannetaises.

Les Vannetais avaient pourtant démarré le match sur un bon rythme et avaient ouvert le score grâce à Rayasi, mais Habosi lui a répondu. Juste avant la mi-temps, Blanchard a permis aux siens de repasser devant en inscrivant un nouvel essai.

Rencontre
Top 14
Vannes
24 - 27
Temps complet
Racing 92
Toutes les stats et les données

Mais au cours de la deuxième mi-temps, Vannes a souffert et manqué de discipline, comme l’a déclaré Maxime Lafage au micro de Canal + à l’issue de la rencontre. « On a été indisciplinés au possible, ce carton jaune nous a fait beaucoup de mal. On a craqué en deuxième période, on ne va pas tout remettre en question. J’espère qu’on se rattrapera la semaine prochaine. »

Après avoir encaissé un essai de Kaitu’u, Arrate a été sanctionné d’un carton jaune. À 14, la tâche s’est compliquée et Gaël Fickou a inscrit le troisième essai des visiteurs avant que Nolann Le Garrec, chez lui, n’inscrive une pénalité qui s’avèrera décisive. Les Vannetais ont commis la bagatelle de 10 fautes en 20 minutes.

En effet, malgré une grosse fin de match et une longue séquence de pilonnage sur la ligne du Racing, Vannes n’a pu faire mieux qu’inscrire 7 points, trop juste pour arracher un nul mais assez pour prendre un point de bonus défensif.

Graphique d'évolution des points

Racing 92 gagne +3
Temps passé en tête
35
Minutes passées en tête
17
43%
% du match passés en tête
21%
93%
Possession sur les 10 dernières minutes
7%
7
Points sur les 10 dernières minutes
3

Au terme de la rencontre, Antoine Gibert confiait à Canal + : « C’est un soulagement car c’était important de gagner ici. C’était un match laborieux face à une très belle équipe. Le fait de ne pas concéder cette défaite montre qu’on a peut-être plus de caractère que les gens ne le pensent. »

ADVERTISEMENT

Le Racing 92, mal parti en championnat, peut souffler. Vannes peut conserver un sentiment mitigé de cette rencontre et devra se reprendre pour ne pas se retrouver distancé dans la course au maintien.

Visionnez gratuitement le documentaire en cinq épisodes “Chasing the Sun 2” sur RugbyPass TV (*non disponible en Afrique), qui raconte le parcours des Springboks dans leur quête pour défendre avec succès leur titre de Champions du monde de rugby

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Commentaires

0 Comments
Soyez le premier à commenter...

Inscrivez-vous gratuitement et dites-nous ce que vous en pensez vraiment !

Inscription gratuite
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 15 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search