Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wales player ratings vs Ireland

Rob Kearney glides through the Welsh defence on his way to the try line. (Photo by Charles McQuillan/Getty Images)

Wales wrapped up their Rugby World Cup preparations on Saturday afternoon in Dublin, as they fell to a 19-10 defeat to Ireland.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was not the farewell that Warren Gatland would have wanted for his side, although there were positives in isolation from the defeat, even with Ireland having controlled the game for the majority of the contest.

We have run the rule over all 23 of Wales’ players from today’s test at the Aviva Stadium.

  1. Leigh Halfpenny6

A mixed bag for Halfpenny, who had one notable spill on the high ball, although he was safe when otherwise tested. Provided an alternative first receiver option when Wales split their back line, but couldn’t provide too much attacking influence in a disjointed attacking game from his side.

    Video Spacer
  1. George North5.5

Very few opportunities to get his hands on the ball, as Wales were limited to playing a tight game. Appeared in midfield once or twice in the second half, looking for work, although games where he plays a more integral role will come over the next two months.

  1. Jonathan Davies5

A poor performance by Davies’ usual standards. He was burnt on the outside for Rob Kearney’s try and fell off a couple of tackles you would expect him to make. Couldn’t quite link the midfield with the threats on the outside, although was able to win a valuable turnover by holding up an Irish carrier just before half time.

  1. Hadleigh Parkes7

The inside centre ran an almost undefendable line back against the grain for his first half try. Few other chances to affect the game in attack, although he was solid defensively throughout.

https://twitter.com/C4Sport/status/1170331080915767297?s=20

  1. Josh Adams5.5

Similar to North, there was little work for Adams on the left wing. He went searching in the midfield, too, although Ireland’s defence offered little space for him to prosper in.

  1. Rhys Patchell4.5

A frustrating performance from Patchell, who left the field after 23 minutes to have an HIA and was permanently replaced. He was lucky not to be intercepted with an early looped and telegraphed pass and he was on the wrong end of a couple of powerful Irish carries.

  1. Tomos Williams5.5

No glaring errors from Williams, although he couldn’t quite manufacture the holes around the fringes that Gareth Davies regularly does. He did have a tendency to over-kick his chasing wings, though, with Ireland able to take the ball without competition.

  1. Wyn Jones7.5

A very encouraging showing with Rob Evans not making Gatland’s 31-man squad. Jones was solid initially versus Tadhg Furlong, before putting a bit of a squeeze on the Irish tighthead on a couple of occasions. Contributed strongly at the breakdown, too.

  1. Elliot Dee7.5

The hooker was one of the better players on the pitch in Dublin, not only proving to be an effective and eager ball-carrier, but also connecting on all seven of his lineouts, showing particular chemistry with Justin Tipuric.

  1. Tomas Francis7

Francis matched the set-piece foundation that Jones gave Wales, although wasn’t quite able to turn the screw in the same way the loosehead was able to. Got through plenty of work in defence, including leading the Welsh kick chase on multiple occasions.

  1. Jake Ball6

Along with Dee and Ross Moriarty, Ball picked up some of the slack close to the ruck as a ball-carrier. Helped give Wales physical parity up front.

  1. Alun Wyn Jones6.5

The Welsh skipper managed to put the Irish lineout under pressure early, as well as being a reliable target for his side. His fringe defensive was physical, too, although he’ll have games where he’s more influential to Wales’ cause.

  1. Aaron Wainwright7

The flanker impressed with his physicality and effectiveness in the defensive line. He was able to rip the ball in contact on one occasion and was consistently holding up Irish carriers and slowing down their ball.

  1. Justin Tipuric6.5

Tipuric was the go-to man for Wales early at the lineout and was also able to get his hands to one of Ireland’s throws. He popped up in the wide channels as a ball-carrier, although he was unable to have his usual success in the midfield or as a jackal at the breakdown for the majority of the game.

  1. Ross Moriarty6

Moriarty got through some of the unglamorous work close to the ruck, although he couldn’t quite inject the explosive carrying that Taulupe Faletau offers or that Tipuric can generate in the wider channels.

Replacements

  1. Ken Owens6

Carried on from where Dee left off, connecting with his one lineout and showing some nice hands in the loose. Wales were starved of possession and territory, limiting how much Owens could add in attack.

  1. Nicky Smith6

Smith did draw a penalty out of Andrew Porter at the scrum, although he couldn’t match the stability that Jones had given the unit.

  1. Dillon Lewis5.5

Like Smith, couldn’t quite match the set-piece solidity that the starting group had given Wales, although he wasn’t significantly outmatched.

  1. Adam Beard5

Came on too late to have much of an impact, apart from some solid fringe defence. Took a sacrificial yellow card for team offences.

  1. Josh Navidi5.5

Didn’t provide the carrying impetus that Wales needed from the bench, with Gatland’s side struggling for front-foot ball in the second half.

  1. Gareth Davies6

The scrum-half provided some immediate momentum from the bench.

https://twitter.com/C4Sport/status/1170332909913296896?s=20

  1. Dan Biggar6.5

Almost the perfect introduction, as he read Jonathan Sexton’s pass for intercept and ran 60m, only to be held up over the try line. He was safe under the high ball when tested and a solid tackler in the 10 channel, too.

  1. Liam Williams6

Looked lively and keen for work after his introduction.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch: Warren Gatland is confidence Wales can win the Rugby World Cup

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

Steelers vs Brave Lupus

LIVE

Waratahs vs Force

LIVE

Singapore SVNS | Day 2

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year

It really all depends of how much overseas players would be paid (by NZR) to play for the All Blacks. I’ve not heard a peep on this front from any author suggesting it’s a good idea.


If it’s nothing (a player gets his weekly paycheck from the club and thats it (which we know is definitely not the case in Ireland and France, or SA even I think?), then maybe it would retain more SR level players given that they’ll be getting the “AB” component (which is about where things stand, Burke for instance would have had to had his Sader contract upgraded to an AB one (think above Pero levels) to be on similar money.


I’d having to imagine if a player is getting paid to do nothing over the international windows though, they are going to want to get paid extra for appear for the ABs, so in this situation, it’s hard to see many players being retained, yes.


I’m pretty sure they flew to Japan and met in person.


I’ve heard/had these discussions numerous times. I don’t think theres anyway to judge the interest that would be retain in SR. For one, it might be a more entertaining league as a result, as the JRLO is compared to Europe, despite it obviously being a lesser standard.


If SRP is of a lesser standard and now able to use Japanese and American players to bolster teams, perhaps those markets more than make up for the downturn in NZ and Aus? Perhaps it gives NZR flexibility to create a more fit for purpose interdomestic competition, and interest actually increases? All you might need is a proper pathway from school to pro?


Razor asked NZR to keep an open mind. Did NZR answer any of these questions to themself?

23 Go to comments
J
JW 2 hours ago
Kyren Taumoefolau All Blacks stance splits opinions on eligibility

Yeah of course it can be, it manages a good commerical outcome when 100 million people are following it. I’m saying rugby is no where near even remotely close to getting the payoff you’re talking about, never mind the distinct lack of anyway to implement it.


So you’re going for the dirty approach. I’m not surprised, it’s the only way to easily implement it right now. I wouldn’t see the benefit to doing that myself. A draft, if purely feasible in it’s own right, doesn’t need to provide commercial benefit at all (if it works, that’s all it needs to do, as it no doubt did back in america’s heyday). But without the advantageous backing of sponsors and interest levels, if you pick the wrong method to implement it, like a dirty approach, you do potential harm to it’s acceptance.


The aspect’s of the approach you chose that I don’t like, is that the franchises are the ones spending the money of the U20’s only for there opposition to get first dibs. Personally, I would much prefer an investment into a proper pathway (which I can’t really see SR U20s being at all in anycase). I’m not exactly sure how the draft works in america, but I’m pretty sure it’s something like ‘anyone whishing to be pro has to sign for the draft’, and results in maybe 10 or 20% of those being drafted. The rest (that accumulative 80/90% year on year) do go back into club, pronvincial, or whatever they have there, and remain scouted and options to bring in on immediate notice for cover etc. You yes, you draw on everybody, but what is generating your interest in the drafties in the first plaec?


This is your missing peace. If some come through school and into the acadamies, which would be most, you’ve currently got three years of not seeing those players after they leave school. Those that miss and come in through club, maybe the second year theyre in the draft or whatever, aged 20/21, you’re going to have no clue how they’ve been playing. NPC is a high level, so any that are good enough to play that would already be drafted, but some late bloomers you might see come in NPC but then Sky’s not going to broadcast that anymore. So what’s generating this massive interest you’re talking about, and most importantly, how does it tie in with the other 7 clubs that will be drafting (and providing) players outside of NZ?


Is the next step to pump tens of millions into SRP U20s? That would be a good start for investment in the youth (to get onto international levels of pathway development) in the first place but are fans going to be interested to the same level as what happens in america? Baseball, as mentioned, has the minor leagues, if we use that model it hasn’t to be broad over the whole pacific, because you’re not having one draft right, they all have to play against each other. So here they get drafted young and sent out into a lower level thats more expansive that SR, is there interest in that? There would be for large parts, but how financially viable would it be. Twiggy tried to get a league started and NPC clubs joined. BOP and Taranaki want SR representation, do we have a mix of the biggest clubs and provinces/states make a couple of divisions? I think that is far more likely to fan interest and commerical capabilities than an U20 of the SR teams. Or ofc Uni fits a lot of options. I’ve not really read anything that has tried to nut out the feasability of a draft, it can certainly work if this spitballing is anything to go by, but I think first theres got to be a need for it far above just being a drafting level.

36 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘Redefine the future’: India unveils revolutionary Rugby Premier League ‘Redefine the future’: India unveils revolutionary Rugby PL
Search