Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies boss Dave Rennie open to picking players based in New Zealand and Japan

(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

Disappointed by the nature of Izack Rodda’s Australian rugby exit, incoming Wallabies coach Dave Rennie plans to stop the player drain, show some love and tinker with the Giteau Law to best harness the talent at his disposal.

ADVERTISEMENT

Former Glasgow and Chiefs coach Rennie is quarantining in his native New Zealand and isn’t likely to arrive in Australia until after Super Rugby AU’s July 3 restart.

Rugby’s shutdown has given him ample thinking time and he described the Giteau Law as “under discussion”.

Video Spacer

Chiefs fan reaction vs Blues

Video Spacer

Chiefs fan reaction vs Blues

The law allows those playing overseas with 60 or more test caps and seven years of service to Australian rugby to play for the Wallabies, a loosening of the policy that allowed Matt Giteau to play in the 2015 World Cup.

Rennie is advocating for a fresh tweak – rather than a complete tear down that he believes would damage the domestic product by enabling the country’s best players to “chase the big money knowing they can still play for their country”.

Instead, Rennie entertained the prospect of including Japanese teams alongside Australian and New Zealand outfits in a revamped Super Rugby competition next year, from which any Australian could play and still be picked for the Wallabies.

That could allow the likes of rampaging centre Samu Kerevi, who left the Queensland Reds for Japan’s Suntory last year, to return to the national fold.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve certainly got players playing in that (Japanese Top League) competition and whether that would make them eligible for selections (is worth considering) because you can compare apples with apples,” Rennie said.

“If we had a Wallaby playing for the Blues, for example, we get to see him playing against the best Aussies.

“From a selection point of view that makes sense … I’m not a big fan of trying to pluck guys out of France.”

https://www.instagram.com/p/CBts4XogVqz/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Rennie was saddened by the recent messy exit of Wallabies lock Rodda, who along with Queensland Reds teammates Harry Hockings and Isaac Lucas refused RA’s pay cut deal and had their contracts terminated.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rodda last week signed a one-year deal to play in France and joined a mounting list of talent ineligible to play Tests.

But Rennie has remained close to the 23-year-old, stressing communication was key to coaxing him and others back in the future.

“The full picture probably hasn’t been painted … he’s gone and whole situation was really messy and I think could’ve been handled a lot better,” he said.

“There’s so many good Australian players playing overseas, young men in their prime but not in our country.

“We’ve made a lot of phone calls … shown a bit of love and can hopefully lure them back over time.”

Rennie, who hopes to meet former national coach Michael Cheika, wants that communication to extend to the boardroom after witnessing chief executive Raelene Castle’s demise during the rugby’s COVID-19 enforced hiatus.

“My assumption is that (negative) comments made in media … hopefully it’s because those people care,” he said.

“So (we need) more conversations face to face, less individuals leaking stuff to media … if we work harder together, pull in the same direction, it’ll improve the brand and continue to develop the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 36 minutes ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

306 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING World Cup-winning halfback on Cam Roigard’s substitution in France loss World Cup-winning halfback on Cam Roigard’s substitution vs. France
Search