Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies learn hearing fate with Springboks looming

By Josh Raisey
Referee James Doleman issues Filipo Daugunu of Australia a yellow card during the International Test Match between Australia Wallabies and Georgia at Allianz Stadium on July 20, 2024 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Jason McCawley/Getty Images)

Australia wing Filipo Daugunu will be available for the start of the Rugby Championship despite receiving a three-match ban for his red card against Georgia.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 29-year-old was red-carded in the first half of the Wallabies’ 40-29 win over Georgia after a bunker review for making contact with the head of opposite man Demur Tapladze with his knee in a charge-down attempt.

The wing has subsequently been banned for three matches this week, though that can be reduced to two should he complete World Rugby’s Coaching Intervention Programme.

Video Spacer

World Rugby Guide to Rugby Sevens

Olympic Rugby Sevens kicks off in Paris on Wednesday. Here’s your full explanation of how it’ll work!

Video Spacer

World Rugby Guide to Rugby Sevens

Olympic Rugby Sevens kicks off in Paris on Wednesday. Here’s your full explanation of how it’ll work!

The matches Daugunu will therefore miss will be for Queensland Premier Rugby’s Sunnybank, who face Souths and UQ on July 27 and August 3.

He will then return for the opening match of the Rugby Championship against the Springboks in Brisbane on August 10, who conversely will be without the recently-banned Andre Esterhuizen.

Fixture
Rugby Championship
Australia
7 - 33
Full-time
South Africa
All Stats and Data

A World Rugby statement reads: “Australia’s Filipo Daugunu has been suspended for two matches (subject to the completion of World Rugby’s Coaching Intervention Programme) for a red card offence contrary to Law 9.11 (dangerous tackle). The red card was issued in Australia’s match against Georgia in Sydney on 20 July, 2024.

“The independent Disciplinary Committee was chaired by Michael Heron KC (New Zealand), joined by former international referee Donal Courtney (Ireland) and former international rugby player Stefan Terblanche (South Africa).

ADVERTISEMENT

“The player accepted that foul play had occurred but did not accept that the offence warranted a red card.

“The Committee considered the player’s submissions, along with the clips and other available evidence and found that the red card was upheld. While the red card issued was for Law 9.13 (dangerous tackle), the Committee decided that the offence should be 9.11 (players must not do anything that is reckless or dangerous) as it was an attempted charge down.

“The Committee considered the appropriate entry point for the offending and decided that the offence warranted the mandatory mid-end entry point for offending involving contact with the head of six matches. Having considered submissions as regards mitigation, the Committee applied full 50 per cent mitigation to the sanction resulting in a sanction of three matches. An additional match may be removed from the sanction should the player complete the World Rugby Coaching Intervention for Sanction Mitigation (CISM) which applies to foul play involving head contact.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
J
Jacque 84 days ago

This unbelievable!! Actually a joke to be honest.

World Rugby Intervention Programme. What is that anyway??

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 39 minutes ago
The stats show the club v country wounds may never heal

Oh the team is fully made up of those types of players I mentioned, that's for sure, but it's still the same thing (even more relevant when you look at some modern Rugby nations). You also defeated you're own point by showing that league didn't have to add those teams to have the international ticking over.


Don't forget England. Though I can accept if you try to argue Gallagher started the trend first the other way!


Union doesn't have to do that but the question of which area leads the game forward remains. It may well end up being the club/provincial game simply because of the volume of fixtures - and primacy of contract.

What are your idea's that "leading" the game entails? A club body that takes over from World Rugby if say whatever you're talking about was to sway the 'club' way? I don't really know why you're trying to demean League, are you worried that's all Union would turn into? Just looking at them now I see it kicked started their own league and they now have a rep team of locals, much the same sort of impetus behind Moana Pasifika and Drua. It was always only a good thing to me and wonder if this means you're leading down the capitalist path not appreciating that?


If you're just talking about the current situation, why would anything change? Perhaps in a non Test Championship year it's the Lions and maybe others should focus on a single tour rather than globe trotting. I certainly think the International game is maxxed out now with 5 or 6 game regional games and the same intercontinentally.


Perhaps a very unique country like NZ may take their brand around the world but even they are surely going to see the most growth in the other half of the season. The domestic season?

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'I feared no opposition. I feared letting Axel down.' – Remembering a legend on a special anniversary 'I feared no opposition. I feared letting Axel down.' – Remembering a legend on a special anniversary
Search