Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies player rating vs England | 3rd Test July 2022

Tom Wright. (Photo by Saeed Khan/AFP via Getty Images)

Both England and Australia came into the third and final test of their series with promising performances under their belt. Discipline and execution would be the deciding factor between two teams hitting some great international form and utilising their strengths effectively.

ADVERTISEMENT

Australia deployed their third-choice fullback due to an injury list which also includes both their starting locks, openside flanker, and x-factor first five-eighth Quade Cooper. England entered the decider with their own injury toll, with three of their players leaving the team in favour of a home recovery.

The English side came through in the end with timely breakdown turnovers, absorbing Australia’s attack as the hosts ran up the phase play and made good ground through their attacking possession. The English defence kicked up a gear when backed into their own 22, showing composure through the pressure being applied and picking their moments to devastate the Wallabies’ hopes of another comeback.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks were left shellshocked following their series defeat to Ireland.

Video Spacer

The All Blacks were left shellshocked following their series defeat to Ireland.

There were, however, some very positive signs for both sides looking ahead to next year’s World Cup. No doubt, Australia’s focus will be on consistency at the breakdown to maintain their platform and see some reward on the scoreboard for their attacking prowess. The English will be looking to maintain some more possession and apply pressure through their tactical territorial game.

Here’s how the Wallabies rated in defeat:

1. James Slipper – 7/10
Another huge shift. Scrum penalties were flowing both ways this game, the Aussie scrum looked most dominant at the end of the game when the fresh legs of Alaalatoa came on. Slipper was solid in defence around the ruck.

2. Dave Porecki – 6.5
Another solid all-around game, doing the little things right – and isn’t required to do much more.

3. Taniela Tupou – 6
Wasn’t able to put his stamp on this one. Got penalised at scrum time and a handling error cost some early momentum.

ADVERTISEMENT

4. Nick Frost – 5.5
Had one or two good runs, it’s obviously not something they’re looking for from him but he finds himself in the right spot at the right time and makes the most of it. Handled the lineout well.

5. Matt Phillip – 7
Started the game with a great play, charging down the return kick and then earning a great steal. Uses his frame well around the park.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by RugbyPass (@rugbypass)


6. Harry Wilson – 6
A quiet night for Harry. Usually such a good ball carrier but looked a bit off out of his familiar role. Still, mobile around the park and did the dirty work in the clean-outs to allow Nic White to do his thing.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Michael Hooper – 7.5
Immense work rate, as usual, looked like he was getting the Richie McCaw treatment the way the English were hitting him every time he carried. Excels in the ruck work keeping the ball readily available for his side.

8. Rob Valetini – 6
Didn’t see quite as much ball as in previous weeks but offered his usual physicality with his limited touches.

9. Nic White – 8
Another class performance. Tested England’s fitness with his quick delivery and variety of running options.

10. Noah Lolesio – 6.5
Started the game by missing a penalty from an advantageous position and then threw an intercept. Settled into his role and made some tricky conversions. With such physical runners coming off his shoulder, he distributed well – but his outstanding halfback does a lot of that for him.

11. Marika Koroibete – 7
This man is as consistent as they come. Made metres with most touches and often popped up around the park away from his wing.

12. Samu Kerevi – 7.5
Seemingly a cheat code for front-foot ball off the set piece. Decent work rate defensively despite being another victim of the Ellis Genge avalanche.

13. Hunter Paisami – 7
Good physical running game. Used as a decoy rather than a distributer in a lot of play.

14. Tom Wright – 8
Made the most of all opportunities that came his way. Handled the high ball well, defended with strength and found space outside the English line.

Related

15. Reece Hodge – 6.5
A shaky start with his early kicks being surprisingly conservative but showcased his power and precision as the game wore on. Had some nice touches on attack after butchering a couple early. Dwarfed by Freddie Steward in the air.

Reserves:

16. Folou Faniga’a – 7.5
Does a great job of backing himself close to the line, picking a smaller body and running straight at them. Made a couple more good runs in centre field, contributing well to his side’s momentum.

17. Angus Bell – N/A
Barely touched the field

18. Allan Alaalatoa – 7
Good intensity, had a positive impact aside from a knock-on. Looked strong in the scrum.

19. Rob Leota – 5
Looked to be dangerous lurking wide but didn’t see much ball.

20. Pete Samu – 7.5
Again came on and had an immediate impact, very dangerous with ball in hand.

21. Tate McDermott – 7
Was able to play on top of the ball and picked out strong ball runners, maintaining momentum well.

22. Len Ikitau – 6.5
Some quality touches in limited opportunities.

23. Suliasi Vunivalu – 5
Did as much as you could expect from someone with three minutes of game time.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

202 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search