Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Bledisloe Cup: Australia player ratings vs New Zealand

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The Wallabies have announced themselves as side of the future after working themselves to exhaustion in their 16-all-draw with the All Blacks at Westpac Stadium in Wellington this afternoon in the first of four Bledisloe Cup Test Matches in 2020.

New Wallabies Coach Dave Rennie evidently prepared this young side superbly with brave selections of debutants Harry Wilson, Hunter Paisami and Filipo Daugunu all looking more than capable at test level.

At times the Wallabies were their own worst enemies with inaccuracy at the breakdown and poor option taking in their opponents 22 yet their attitude and enthusiasm for contact was a significant improvement. Rennie’s men  brought lethal line speed and rattled the All Blacks attack numerous times with bone jarring defence and new defence coach Matt Taylor should be applauded for his efforts.

There is room for improvement, but these Wallabies did themselves, the jersey and their nation proud this afternoon. How did the Wallabies rate?

1. James Slipper – 7/10

The veteran prop had a solid shift despite the Wallabies scrum having issues with timing on the engage. He was industrious around the park and showed that he is still one of the premier loose heads in the Australian game.

2. Folau Fainga’a – 6/10

Was guilty of several unforced errors in and around the lineout when the Wallabies were on attack. Needs to develop more to his game than scoring tries off the back of rolling mauls from the set piece if he is to be a long-term Wallaby.

3. Taniela Tupou – 6.5/10

Was tremendous with his line-speed, and also with his ball carries ‘Tongan Thor’ was guilty several times on infringing around the clean out whilst on attack thwarting his sides momentum. Will need to address this moving into next week.

4. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto – 8/10

Arguably his greatest test. He was physical on both sides of the ball and largely had improved his body height in contact. Looks much more effective playing in the engine room and was a leader out there today.

5. Matt Philip – 7.5/10

The absolute ‘workhorse’ of the Wallaby pack and was in the thick of it being in cleaning out, running support lines or taking the ball over the advantage line. Will only get better after today’s test as he will know now he can be effective at this level.

6. Harry Wilson – 7.5/10

Played as all Wallaby fans hoped he would. He was physical and at times was a handful for the All Blacks and thought he outplayed Shannon Frizzell. Wilson looked comfortable at test level, but also played intelligently, running support lines allowing space to open up elsewhere. Was most effective running in the wider channels and linking up with fellow debutant Filipo Daugunu.

7. Michael Hooper – 7.5/10

Was tireless in his 100th test. Whilst I thought he was outplayed by Sam Cane, Hoop’s was a handful for the All Blacks around the breakdown. He needed to get his side to cut out the silly errors and poor option taking earlier as a leader should but all together another quality Michael Hooper shift.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CGL5O-OBsE4/

8. Pete Samu – 7/10 

A very tough, honest performance by the former Crusader. Was the perfect option to balance what Wilson and Hooper bring to the table and was a warrior in the breakdown and with the ball in hand busting through two would be All Blacks defenders.

9. Nic White – 7.5/10

Was a real general out there and does not appear daunted by Aaron Smith. Whilst finding the ire of the referee for too much chat, the former Exeter half was a handful for his opponents today. The only real blemish was his missed tackle on Aaron Smith that lead to an All Black try.

10. James O’Connor – 7.5/10

His option taking was more often than not the right one. He took the ball to the line when it was required and his foot work and timed pass to Marika Koroibete was centimetre perfect.

11. Marika Koroibete – 6.5/10

Scored a wonderful try yet also guilty of giving away penalties and not securing possession when on attack. That aside, a credible day out.

12. Matt To’omua – 6.5/10

Was physical in defence and had some wonderful touches in attack working off O’Connor well. Yet his option taking on the attack was questionable kicking when he should have retained possession and allow for the pressure to keep building.

13. Hunter Paisami – 7/10

Was fearsome with his physicality and what impressed was his directness. Only on one occasion was he caught drifting but his strength allowed him to stay in the contest. A very encouraging test debut.

14. Filipo Daugunu – 7.5/10 

Was exceptional for debutant. Scored a wonderful try, solid in defence and worked well over the ball. If he and Harry Wilson can keep working off each other they will cause the All Blacks plenty of issues next week.

15. Tom Banks – 6.5/10 

A fair day out and was largely safe up the back and chimed in nicely on a number of occasions in attack. Would like to see him be a hungrier for involvement on attack as when he is one he is a potent threat.

Reserves

16. Jordan Uelese – 6/10 – Solid but the Wallabies finishing front row collectively will need address scrum issues.

17. Scott Sio – 6/10 – Solid yet the same as Uelese will need to fix the scrum.

18. Allan Alaalatoa – 6.5 – Coming on for Toupo, he got through plenty of work and was safe when involved. Solid performance.

19. Rob Simmons 5/10 – Had some quality involvements yet for a player of his experience, he really should have not have infringed in the maul allowing the All Blacks to slot the goal leveling the scores at 16-16.

20. Rob Valetini – 5/10 – Didn’t do anything of note apart from dropping one cold.

21. Jake Gordon – 5.5/10 – Was respectable but the Wallabies looked more fluid when White was on the field.

22. Noah Lolesio – N/A

23. Reece Hodge – 6/10 – Was safe and nearly clinched it for the Wallabies with his own ‘John Eales’ moment but it wasn’t to be.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

A
AllyOz 23 hours ago
Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?

I will preface this comment by saying that I hope Joe Schmidt continues for as long as he can as I think he has done a tremendous job to date. He has, in some ways, made the job a little harder for himself by initially relying on domestic based players and never really going over the top with OS based players even when he relaxed his policy a little more. I really enjoy how the team are playing at the moment.


I think Les Kiss, because (1) he has a bit more international experience, (2) has previously coached with Schmidt and in the same setup as Schmidt, might provide the smoothest transition, though I am not sure that this necessarily needs to be the case.


I would say one thing though about OS versus local coaches. I have a preference for local coaches but not for the reason that people might suppose (certainly not for the reason OJohn will have opined - I haven't read all the way down but I think I can guess it).


Australia has produced coaches of international standing who have won World Cups and major trophies. Bob Dwyer, Rod Macqueen, Alan Jones, Michael Cheika and Eddie Jones. I would add John Connolly - though he never got the international success he was highly successful with Queensland against quality NZ opposition and I think you could argue, never really got the run at international level that others did (OJohn might agree with that bit). Some of those are controversial but they all achieved high level results. You can add to that a number of assistants who worked OS at a high level.


But what the lack of a clear Australian coach suggests to me is that we are no longer producing coaches of international quality through our systems. We have had some overseas based coaches in our system like Thorn and Wessels and Cron (though I would suggest Thorn was a unique case who played for Australia in one code and NZ in the other and saw himself as a both a NZer and a Queenslander having arrived here at around age 12). Cron was developed in the Australian system anyway, so I don't have a problem with where he was born.


But my point is that we used to have systems in Australia that produced world class coaches. The systems developed by Dick Marks, which adopted and adapted some of the best coaching training approaches at the time from around the world (Wales particularly) but focussed on training Australian coaches with the best available methods, in my mind (as someone who grew up and began coaching late in that era) was a key part of what produced the highly skilled players that we produced at the time and also that produced those world class coaches. I think it was slipping already by the time I did my Level II certificate in 2002 and I think Eddie Jones influence and the priorities of the executive, particularly John O'Neill, might have been the beginning of the end. But if we have good coaching development programmes at school and junior level that will feed through to representative level then we will have


I think this is the missing ingredient that both ourselves and, ironically, Wales (who gave us the bones of our coaching system that became world leading), is a poor coaching development system. Fix that and you start getting players developing basic skills better and earlier in their careers and this feeds through all the way through the system and it also means that, when coaching positions at all levels come up, there are people of quality to fill them, who feed through the system all the way to the top. We could be exporting more coaches to Japan and England and France and the UK and the USA, as we have done a bit in the past.


A lack of a third tier between SR and Club rugby might block this a little - but I am not sure that this alone is the reason - it does give people some opportunity though to be noticed and play a key role in developing that next generation of players coming through. And we have never been able to make the cost sustainable.


I don't think it matters that we have an OS coach as our head coach at the moment but I think it does tell us something about overall rugby ecosystem that, when a coaching appointment comes up, we don't have 3 or 4 high quality options ready to take over. The failure of our coaching development pathway is a key missing ingredient for me and one of the reasons our systems are failing.

131 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search