Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies Player Ratings vs All Blacks

More bad news for the Wallabies (Getty Images)

Wallabies Player Ratings

The Wallabies opened their Bledisloe series and Rugby Championship campaign with a 38-13 loss in Sydney. Here’s how they fared individually.

ADVERTISEMENT

1. Tom Roberston – 4/10

The late call-up Tom Robertson filled in for Scott Sio but was part of a Wallaby front row that was dominated from the get go. Robertson was penalised on the first scrum of the game for collapsing under pressure from Franks and was under pressure all night. He was reliable in defence and carried in tight but couldn’t set a stable platform for the Wallabies

2. Tatafu Polota-Nau – 4/10

The Wallabies needed Polota-Nau’s experience in this one but his lineout throwing was undone early under pressure from Retallick. His first two throws were stolen and his replacement Latu didn’t do much better. The All Blacks picked off seven throws in total in the match and completed a set-piece domination at both lineout and scrum.

He made a nice break in the first half and forced an error in a tackle on Retallick but was subbed early in the second half.

3. Sekope Kepu – 3.5/10

Kepu was ineffective all around, especially in the first half. Had one carry in forty minutes in addition to losing control at scrum time. Was penalised on his side and was subbed in the 34th minute. He returned in the second half but again conceding more penalties at scrum time.

4. Izack Rodda – 6/10

Played well at the lineout despite a bad night for the pack. Stole two lineouts against the throw, including on own the Wallabies own five in a pressure situation with the game still in the contest. When targeted, Rodda was reliable for the Wallabies on their own throws.

ADVERTISEMENT

5. Adam Coleman – 5/10

Coleman carried well and defended stoutly in close channels, getting through a big load of work. Coleman’s biggest dissapointment of the night was at the lineout where he was ineffective when jumping. Retallick and Whitelock keyed in on him and picked off numerous throws as the Wallabies set piece capitulated.

6. Lukhan Tui – 3/10

Tui’s first carry was right into the teeth of the All Blacks, and he was chewed up and spit out. His next was an exit carry in his own 22 which he got hit by Sam Cane and turned the ball over. Was so-so as a jumper in the lineout, and missed half his tackles in the first half, conceding a line break to Ben Smith which lead to the All Blacks first try right on halftime. He showed flashes in attack, with a highlight reel bumpoff on Naholo and a nice offload which set Maddocks away but too inconsistent and not up to test level standard.

7. Michael Hooper – 6/10

Hooper tried hard, getting through a lot of work as he usually does. He guarded the middle third and put pressure on in defence with good line speed. He managed to force a couple errors, making a few key steals but missed a few tackles that let his overall performance down.

ADVERTISEMENT

8. David Pocock – 8/10

Pocock was immense in the first half and big part of why the Wallabies held a 6-5 lead going into halftime. Had the first line break of the game off a short line out, forced two turnovers, had 11 tackles and seven carries in the first 40 minutes.

As the All Blacks broke the game open in the second half, Pocock had less impact, finishing with four turnovers and 18 tackles but also with four missed. He still pressured the breakdown, often committing multiple defenders into the ruck. Best on field for the Wallabies.

9. Will Genia – 7/10

Started the game with a high tempo, controlling the game when the Wallabies got inside the All Blacks 22. Couldn’t capitalise on early pressure as the Wallabies settled for two penalty shots. He asked questions of the All Blacks but couldn’t find the big blows. He sparked a long-range break in the second half that also nullified a potential All Blacks try and probed all night. Played well in a losing side.

High Tempo early. Controlled tempo inside 22, ran most of the attack. Asked questions of the All Blacks. Sparked long range break in second half that could’ve been a crucial All Blacks try.

10. Bernard Foley – 5/10

Overall, a mediocre performance from Foley. Not too bad but not impressive either. Beale took over the core duties like exit kicking and playmaking, leaving Foley to organise and distribute. Outside of goal line exiting, when he did kick, he kicked aimlessly downfield giving the All Blacks counter opportunities.

11. Marika Koroibete – 5/10

Saved a Barrett touchfinder with brilliant skill in the first half which kept the Wallabies lead in tact. In a crucial moment, got stripped one-on-one by Naholo which lead to All Blacks Goodhue try. Replays showed he was unlucky to not receive a penalty as his knee was down, but all the same was a big turning point. Was turned around by Barrett, caught out with long kick and then turned the ball over with bad pass inside the 22.

12. Kurtley Beale – 6.5/10

Was a solid performance from Beale who ran most of the attack from second receiver and played with speed and flair, as well as taking a share of the kicking. Was targeted in defence early but came through.

Missed an opportunity by spilling an inside ball from Genia on a break following turnover ball but also had a hand in the Wallabies only try by offloading in the tackle to help free Maddocks away.

13. Reece Hodge – 6/10

Was reliable in the midfield for the Wallabies, playing the majority of the game before finishing on the wing. His set-piece defence was solid, keeping the All Blacks out for a good 40 minutes. Kicked his penalties early and also had a booming exit kick from the dead ball line.

Had one nice line break in attack in the second half but didn’t offer much else in attack, as to be expected playing out of position.

14. Dane Haylett-Petty 4/10

Had a largely quiet night on the wing but kept Ioane under wraps for most the night. Wasn’t seen much in the air to contest in the kicking game, but had a few good clearing kicks himself. His worst play of the night was one of the biggest, dropping a ball cold off a set-piece scrum play that was kicked ahead by Barrett for a try that stretched the lead to two-scores ahead 19-6. Was substituted soon after.

15. Israel Folau – 5/10

Folau looked good early, injecting himself and getting a lot of touches in the first stanza. Looked dangerous but had limited success breaking tackles or the line. Had a couple of good plays in defence, bringing down Barrett after a clean break and intercepting a pass that would have lead to an All Blacks try.

He was injured in the 60th minute during a kick contest, hobbling off after twisting an ankle badly. A big confidence blow for the Wallabies and could be a huge loss for the rest of the Rugby Championship.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 6 | Le Crunch

The Unexpected Journey to USA 7s Glory | Aaron Cummings | Sevens Wonders

USA vs Japan | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 1 hour ago
Why ‘the curse of the Bambino’ is still stronger than ever at Leinster

A first half of defensive failures is a problem, but they rectified that after half time. That left them with a points-difference mountain to climb. They actually did it, and spent minutes at the end of the game three points adrift, with possession, and on the opposition goal line. They had an extra player. And they also had a penalty right there.


Forget anything else that happened in the game … top teams convert that. They rise to the moment, reduce errors, maintain discipline, increase their energy, and sharpen their focus for those moments that matter. And the question for fans is simply one of why their team could not do this, patiently and accurately retaining possession while creating a scoring opportunity.


Different teams would have done different things with that penalty. A dominant scrumming team might have called the scrum, a successful mauling team might have gone for the lineout, a team with a rock star kicker and a sense of late game superiority might have taken the kick for goal, and a another team might have set a Rassie-esque midfield maul to allow an easy dropped goal. You pick what you have confidence in.


So Leinster picking the tap is not wrong, as long as that is a banker play for them. But don’t pick an option involving forwards smashing into gainline tackles if you have less than 100% confidence in your ball retention.


In the end it all came down to whether Leinster could convert that penalty to points. The stage was set, they held all the cards, and it was time for the killer blow (to mix a few metaphors). This is when giants impose themselves.


The coaching team need to stare at those few minutes of tape 1,000 times, and ask themselves why the team could not land that winning blow. Its not about selections, or replacements, or refereeing, or skillsets, or technique. It is a question of attitude and Big Match Temperament. It’s about imposing your will. Why was it not in evidence?

5 Go to comments
W
Werner 1 hour ago
URC teams aren't proving Stephen Donald wrong

Mate, you're the one that brought up financials saying they have to run a 12 month season to make ends meet. If they were in the SRP they would be struggling more financially. If you think financials don't have an impact a teams competitiveness I would argue different. More money means more capacity to retain and develop talent, to develop rugby pathways and most importantly keep the lights on during the ebb years.


Secondly if we are calling SRP and URC a domestic comp I feel like we're colouring well outside the lines. But if we are drawing parallels to SRP and URC “domestic” comps and you're question of dominance I'd point out that SA have had 3 teams in each quarter final since they joined and either won or been a runner up to the tournament every year. Hardly flunking it. As far as fanbase, you can use viewership, subscriptions or bums on seats and CC is still ahead on the fanbase vs SRP, the benefit of a rugby nation with double the population of AU.

Other than financials the benefits of URC are also as you mentioned more games but also more teams and players getting exposure to professional rugby (it's actually 5 teams if you include the repechage of the SA teams). With the schedules and competition setup all URC teams are required to have enough players to field 2-3 teams across the season. Previously under the SR you had 5 teams being forced into 4 squads with minimal change between squads week in week out.


See the thing about the SR or URC being better for competitiveness falls over pretty quick when you understand its a too way street. Arguing that SA is better or worse off because they left the SRP implies that AU and NZ aren't impacted and that they some how stay sharp without outside competition. All teams are worse off in the regard that they are no longer exposed to the different playing styles But When you consider RWC I would argue that being in the URC is a benefit to SA because they are far more likely to face a European team in the pool stages than AU or NZ.

43 Go to comments
S
SK 2 hours ago
Why ‘the curse of the Bambino’ is still stronger than ever at Leinster

Well Nick I have a theory why Leinster seem to lose so often at this stage of the season and it has to do with the Six Nations and what happens after that. In all of the seasons Leinster have come up short they have dominated going into the 6N. Then after that with Irish players coming out of camp they have some breathing space in the URC so they rest the lads. The SA tour almost always follows between week 12-16 of the URC. Leinster send weakened teams and have lost all games but one against the Sharks this year. They invariably ship one more in the URC regular season to an Ulster or a Munster and this year it was the Scarlets. They usually do so when starting weakened sides or teams that are half baked with a few of their internationals and their bench strength in what can be described as some kind of odd trail mix. The 6N takes its toll. The Irish lads come back battered and some come back injured. They also spend time in Irelands camp training within Irish systems with the coaches and these are slightly different to what they do at Leinster and in the last 2 seasons have been massively different on D. In the last 4-6 weeks of the URC the boys coming back from the Irish camp are not featuring. They are managed either side of the knockouts in the Champions cup. They sometimes play just 3-5 games over a 10 week period. They go from being battered and bruised to being underdone and out of whack. They lose all momentum with the losses they accrue and doubts start to set in. Suddenly sides find ways to unlock them, they make mistakes and they just cant deal with the pressure. At this time the weather also turns from cold, wet and rancid to bright and sunny. Suddenly the tempo is lifted on fields and conditions that are great for attractive rugby. Leinster start to concede points and dont put in the shift they used to. They have no momentum to do so. When will the coaching staff realise that they need to do something different at this point? They keep trying to manage the players and their systems in the same way every season when the boys come back from Ireland duty and its always the same result. A disaster in the last 3-4 weeks of the season. This year it came earlier. Maybe thats a blessing. With 2 rounds left in the URC they can focus their attentions. Perhaps thats where Leinsters attention needs to be anyway. They need to reclaim their bread and butter competition title before pushing onto the next star.

5 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING URC teams aren't proving Stephen Donald wrong URC teams aren't proving Stephen Donald wrong
Search