Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies player ratings vs New Zealand | Bledisloe Cup II

Noah Lolesio of Australia looks on during The Rugby Championship & Bledisloe Cup match between New Zealand All Blacks and Australia Wallabies at Sky Stadium on September 28, 2024 in Wellington, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

The Wallabies have been beaten by the All Blacks in Wellington 33-13. Following last weekend’s heroics in Sydney, the men in gold seemed the more confident of the two sides early on but they couldn’t maintain any dominance throughout the entire Test.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fraser McReight was once again the pick of the Wallabies as they fought valiantly against an All Blacks outfit that got better as the match went on. Australia have finished this year’s Rugby Championship in last place after only winning one of six Tests.

Here’s how the Wallabies rated.

Match Summary

0
Penalty Goals
2
5
Tries
1
4
Conversions
1
0
Drop Goals
0
155
Carries
143
9
Line Breaks
4
12
Turnovers Lost
15
9
Turnovers Won
5

  1. Angus Bell – 6/10

It was a solid 60-minute shift from Angus Bell. The world-class loosehead prop finished with 14 tackles and an impressive number of carries as well, but the New South Welshman did seem to go missing for periods of this Test too.

  1. Matt Faessler – 5

If we start with the essentials here, Matt Faessler was quite accurate at the set-piece for the Wallabies. Faessler only had one lineout tipped off by the All Blacks, so the Wallabies actually seemed quite confident with their lineout.

Away from the set-piece, Faessler was absent around the park. The hooker only made a handful of stops in defence and finished with five carries as well on what was a bit of an off night for the 25-year-old who is usually quite threatening around the park.

  1. Taniela Tupou – 5

The party was almost over for Taniela Tupou before it’d really begun. Tupou went down after 60 seconds with what appeared to be a knee injury, but after some intervention from the medical team, the world-renowned tighthead prop powered on in Wallaby gold.

Tupou was fairly poor in Sydney and there’s no hiding from that. But this time, the man known as ‘The Tongan Thor’ was much better in the No. 3 jumper. The 28-year-old scrummed well and was impactful in general play, but he did give away one penalty as a notable negative

  1. Nick Frost – 7

Nick Frost embodies the meaning of a ‘workhorse’ on the rugby field. The towering lock was a general at the set-piece as the Wallabies’ top lineout option, but his impact went far beyond that. Frost was a man on a mission in both attack and defence.

Frost was right up there for a while with the top All Blacks for tackles completed, and the Wallaby also added an impressive number of carries. The second-rower was also a menace at lineout time for the All Blacks; stealing one and tipping another throw from Codie Taylor.

  1. Jeremy Williams – 7

Jeremy Williams was once again a reliable option for the Wallabies in their middle row. Without breaking the game open with eye-catching carries or monstrous shots on defence, Williams was able to put in a solid shift alongside Nick Frost.

While Frost was used more frequently at the set-piece, Williams was able to make an impact with a handful of carries and more than a dozen stops in defence. Then there’s the stuff that can’t be tallied like the lock’s support play at the breakdown.

  1. Rob Valetini – 7

Rob Valetini is a world-class backrower so the expectations that follow him after going to be high. All year, Wallabies fans have been treated to a series of outstanding performances from ‘Bobby V’ but this was a bit of a step backwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

Valetini is usually one of the best on ground for the men in gold, and while the blindside flanker wasn’t exactly poor, others were clearly better. Seven Wallabies had made more tackles than him, and Valetini was 12th for carries by the time he was replaced in the 59th minute.

  1. Fraser McReight – 9

Fraser McReight is the Wallabies’ best player at the moment. The openside flanker returned from injury for last weekend’s Test in Sydney – scored a try and was in the Player of the Match discussion – and that high-level form carried through to ‘Windy Wellington’.

For the second Test in a row, McReight scored the Wallabies’ first try. The Queenslander came close to scoring another later in the first half but was held up over the chalk. But, aside from that, the Queenslander was also really impressive in defence and at the breakdown.

  1. Harry Wilson (c) – 8

This was Harry Wilson’s fourth Test as captain of the Wallabies and it seems that leadership role is really starting to suit the backrower. Wilson led by example once again by throwing his body at All Blacks rivals in attack, defence and at the breakdown.

Wilson’s first carry was a run off the back fence – returning a goal-line dropout in the fourth minute – and the skipper continued to make an impact from there. The No. 8 finished as one of Australia’s top tacklers on the night.

  1. Jake Gordon – 8

It’s not hard to understand why coach Joe Schmidt has regularly selected Jake Gordon in the Wallabies’ starting side. Nic White was solid in the No. 9 jersey in Sydney, but Jordon brings a more expansive skillset to the table – including a lethal running game.

Gordon helped control the pace of the Wallabies’ attack really well with a passing game that was both smooth and accurate. The 31-year-old’s kicking game was also solid. While Gordon bombed a golden chance to score early on, he made amends with his performance.

  1. Noah Lolesio – 6

There were moments to like about Noah Lolesio’s performance but it wasn’t enough to put the flyhalf selection debate to rest just yet. Lolesio seemed to go missing for extended periods while those outside him – mainly Len Ikitau – were able to make an impact. Lolesio, to be fair, did kick well with one conversion and two successful penalty goals.

  1. Dylan Pietsch – 6

It was a game of two halves for Dylan Pietsch, and sometimes that’s just the way it goes for those wearing numbers either 11 or 14. The ball came Pietsch’s way four times during the opening 40-minute period but only twice in the second half

ADVERTISEMENT

When Pietsch did get an opportunity to play with possession, the left winger actually looked fairly threatening. In the 26-year-old’s first start on the Wallabies’ wing, there was enough for Joe Schmidt to like ahead of the Spring Tour.

  1. Hunter Paisami – 5

Hunter Paisami only carried the ball a couple of times and was instead called upon to make his mark on the defensive side of the ball. The inside centre finished in double digits for tackles completed, but there’s still plenty to work on ahead of the end-of-year tour.

  1. Len Ikitau – 6

About 10 minutes into the contest, the Wallabies played with all of the match’s momentum. The men in gold were running it from everywhere and that included a significant carry from Len Ikitau which saw the centre beat Sam Cane with sheer pace and determination.

That set the tone for a good performance from Ikitau who got stuck in on both attack and defence. Ikitau is a leader in the Wallabies’ backline and it’ll be interesting to see how his combination with Paisami continues to develop over the next four Tests.

  1. Andrew Kellaway – 5

Andrew Kellaway was kept unusually quiet last weekend in Sydney but it wasn’t the same story this time around across the ditch. Kellaway’s first carry was a good one as the right winger linked up with Jake Gordon with a perfectly executed set-play move off a scrum.

Kellaway ended up causing problems by breaking down the right edge, putting a chip kick in, and so nearly reaping the rewards by scoring himself. Other than that, the NSW Waratahs recruit went on to have a steady night with some other noticeable involvements.

  1. Tom Wright – 4

It was an uncharacteristically quiet performance from Tom Wright who was unable to make some noise in any part of the match. The fullback finished the Test with the least number of tackles made for any player (1) and also only a couple of carries in attack.

Replacements

  1. Brandon Paenga-Amosa – 6
  2. Isaac Kailea – 6.5
  3. Allan Alaalatoa – 5
  4. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto – 6.5
  5. Langi Gleeson – 6
  6. Tate McDermott – 5
  7. Ben Donaldson – N/A
  8. Josh Flook – 4
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

10 Comments
A
AM 82 days ago

Sorry but your assessments make me wonder if you have a clue.


- without Thor and Bell the scrum would be a constant source of penalties and AA was under pressure when he came on with the ref coming round to his side on the feed. If that is all that props do it’s a 7 minimum. Look at FM for SA.


- McReight gets a 6. His support play is a 9 but his disruption at the breakdown is not at international level and nor is his jackle. Wallabies would be better off with Tizanno and using wingers more in support play. If they start more impactful locks like Skelton, Philip Arnold then he makes more sense but current locks not up to it.


- Don’t see how you can give such high marks to the locks. 7 for lineout but only 4 for impact at the breakdown. Better off with Amatesero for more bulk from the domestic players and Skelton and Philip from OS with LsL.


- Wilson was poor. Cannot fault his effort but his handling cost the team points. Similar issues all tournament and he doesn’t bust tackles. Gleeson the better option. Gets a 5.


- Paisami worst of the backs with usual poor decision making like the charged down kick that lead to a try. Replace him with Hodge Kerevi combo for support with kicking game and yardage.


Schmidt making consistent selection errors and need Skelton, Philip, Latu, Sio, Ainsley, Hodge, Kerevi and Arnolds as minimum to be remotely competitive against the lions and the Nov games

C
ClintP 83 days ago

Time for Tim Ryan to be blooded and Edmed flown in from NZ, he’s playing some incredible rugby for North Harbour.

A
AC 83 days ago

Harry Wilson marked a little too high - couple of dropped balls

Tom Wright scored too low - was dangerous again today.

J
JW 84 days ago

Take a look at that Eddie Jones, that's how you build a team to win a World Cup in just 8 or 9 matches.


That was a fabulous game. Wallabies were as good as what England or South Africa gave as opposition for large parts of that game. That's with some rough marks in there too. Well fought footy all through and really interesting game, well from an AB perspective anyway.


That would have put in a good semi final performance, and probably won them the 3rd/4th playoff. Still going to have a couple of tough fixtures at the end of year? This gives encouragement they will be making a game of it (and working the All Blacks opponents hard hopefully!).

T
Toaster 83 days ago

Agree

They more than held their own in the scrum before the replacements made a difference for each team

Good lineout combo and world class back row IMO

As an ABs fan I’d love to have McReight who completely outplayed Cane


I’m not convinced about Lolosio and Kellaway though

The latter is a massive defensive liability but good on attack


Their midfield is competent enough but despite the scoreline it was a great first half with the Wallabies the better team and only for some stout ABs defence at the end of the game keeping the gap as it was

B
Bull Shark 83 days ago

I’ve said it before. Australia will overtake England in the rankings. They’ve shown good improvements since the beginning off the year.

P
Pn 84 days ago

Tom Wright made a few breaks didn't he?

T
Toaster 83 days ago

Yeah he was pretty good and is always dangerous

H
HG 84 days ago

Yeah he did, a 4 seems really tough on Wright. Thought he was at least a 7.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search