Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallabies v All Blacks - Player Ratings

Will Genia of the Wallabies celebrates the win with his team during The Rugby Championship match between the Australian Wallabies and the South Africa Springboks at Suncorp Stadium on September 8, 2018 in Brisbane, Australia. Photo by Jono Searle/Getty Images

Few would have expected the absolute drubbing that the Wallabies handed to the All Blacks in last night’s Bledisloe Cup match.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies started with great impetus and looked more than up for the match. It was a late red card to Scott Barrett in the first half that will likely dominate the discussion in the coming days, but that undervalues just how good Australia were.

The All Blacks had to dig deep in the second with just 14 men on the field, but they weren’t able to match up to the Wallabies’ continued intensity. Ultimately, the Wallabies prevailed 47-26 – equalling their previous biggest win over the All Blacks. This match marked the most points that New Zealand have ever conceded in a match and the kiwis will be desperate to bounce back at Eden Park next weekend.

All that being said, how did the two teams rate?

Wallabies

1. Scott Sio 6/10

Didn’t take a step back in the scrums and was busy in the breakdowns. Put in a good shift.

2. Tolu Latu – 7

Always willing to truck the ball up and was difficult to take down – kept the ball alive when necessary. No issues at the lineout or with discipline. Could this performance earn him the 2 jersey moving forward?

3. Alan Alaalatoa – 7

Strong carries and reliable in the scrums, earning a penalty against Joe Moody. Made 9 tackles but one bad miss on Dane Coles led to Rieko Ioane’s try.

4. Izack Rodda – 6

ADVERTISEMENT

The big man made good metres with ball in hand and was reliable in the lineouts. Didn’t assert his presence as much as he could have, especially once the All Blacks lost a man.

5. Rory Arnold – 5.5

Safe but underwhelming. Is this really the best that the Wallabies have?

6. Lukhan Salakaia-Loto – 5

Made way too many mistakes early on in the match but regularly trucked the ball up. Not the answer at 6 for the Wallabies.

ADVERTISEMENT

7. Michael Hooper – 7

Didn’t stand out as much in the loose as you’d expect in a try-fest. Still managed to run for 48 metres with the ball. Made a clutch steal in the 67th minute to stall any building New Zealand momentum. Marshalled his troops well.

8. Isi Naisarani – 6.5

All Blacks struggled to bring the big man to the ground, trucked the ball up very efficiently.

9. Nic White – 8.5

Great speed and passion from the surprise selection. Commanded his forwards and made sure the Wallabies never stopped pushing the All Blacks. Played a big part in keeping the game high-octane. One of the players of the match.

10. Christian Lealiifano – 7

Showed more of a running game than we’re used to. Kicked when he needed to kick but was tidy when taking the ball to the line too. Missed few tough kicks at goal.

11. Marika Koroibete – 6

Started well with a good kick and chase that put the All Blacks under pressure. Scored a sneaky forwards’ try but otherwise failed to get himself involved in the game too much. Needed to go looking for work.

12. Samu Kerevi – 9

A hugely dominant display from the burly midfielder – came of age. Bowled through All Blacks for fun. Skipped past Smith and wrecked Barrett for an excellent try assist. Did botch one try in the 25th minute, when he failed to pass the ball to an unmarked man on the wing. More than made up for it elsewhere.

13. James O’Connor – 6.5

Created the Wallabies’ first try with a fend on Goodhue and a sneaky offload. Threw the last pass for late Wallabies try. Looked composed – good enough to start again next week.

14. Reece Hodge – 7

The best winger on display, despite a few errors. Regularly hit the line with great intent, clocked up the second most metres run of any player on the field and useful under the high ball. Good distance from penalty kicks, too.

15. Kurtley Beale – 7

Botched a try in the same set of phases as Kerevi and had a fairly quiet first half. Came alive as the Wallabies got ascendancy and helped keep his team humming. Snaked his way through the All Blacks’ defence to score at the death. Top metre eater with 96 to his name.

16. Folau Fainga’a – 4.5

17. James Slipper – 4

18. Taniela Tupou – 7

19. Adam Coleman – 7

20. Luke Jones – N/A

21. Will Genia – 5

22. Matt To’omua – 6

23. Tom Banks – N/A

Video Spacer

All Blacks

1. Joe Moody – 5

Penalised once at the scrum. Called upon to make a number of tackles and didn’t disappoint in that regard.

2. Dane Coles – 7.5

Bad miss early on Samu Kerevi – but not the only All Blacks to fail to bring the big man down. Made a brilliant run down the left flank to set up Rieko Ioane’s try.

3. Owen Franks – 5.5

Similar story to Moody. Solid on defence with 11 tackles to his name, but having one less defender on the field made it a difficult night for the less mobile props.

4. Scott Barrett – 1

Made 10 tackles in half a game of rugby, which isn’t a bad result. Perhaps the All Blacks would have lost regardless of Barrett’s red card, but that should be no consolation. Cost his team any chance at a victory.

5. Sam Whitelock – 6.5

Busy on defence with 18 tackles and safe in the lineouts. Didn’t make any of his trademark runs and was surprisingly subbed late in the match – probably because he was absolutely spent. Hit a lot of breakdowns.

6. Ardie Savea – 7

Conceded two early penalties though was probably unlucky with one. Played with six on his back, but was used in the lineouts and also packed down at 8 in the scrums. Stood up late in the game with some powerful runs. Loses points for his stupid push on the back of Hooper’s head – that’s the kind of stupid penalty that could decide a game decider.

7. Sam Cane – 5.5

Showed heart to attempt to chase Nic White down for his try. Subbed immediately afterwards – probably not dynamic enough to be on the field when his side’s a man down, but that’s true of most forwards. Tackled his heart out.

8. Kieran Read – 7.5

The everywhere man. Answered a lot of questions asked of him but still not back to his best. Had to lock down in the scrums after Barrett’s red card. Made a potential try-saving tackle on Hooper late in the piece. Bad decision late in the game to tap penalty instead of kicking for the lineout. Topped the tackle charts with 21 to his name.

9. Aaron Smith – 5

Rode the pine against South Africa and didn’t really do enough this week to cement his spot as the starting halfback. Not easy being a halfback when your team has no ball, however.

10. Richie Mo’unga – 7

Mixed up his game well and took the ball to the line with great efficiency in the second half. Looked far more assured this week. Also made a try-saving tackle on Kerevi.

11. Rieko Ioane – 4

Very nearly gifted the Wallabies a try, quiet game on attack otherwise. Worrying signs – that’s two poor weeks in a row.

12. Anton Lienert-Brown – 8

Took his chances – scored a good try because of it following through on Jack Goodhue’s kick. Always dangerous and such a reliable defender, making the most tackles of any back on the field. Got caught out running sideways one time too many.

13. Jack Goodhue – 4

Bad miss early almost cost the ABs points and wasn’t able to nail James O’Connor shortly after, which created the Wallabies’ first try. Moments later put in an excellent kick to create the All Blacks’ first. Injured early and may not be available for a few weeks.

14. Ben Smith – 6

Shut down Wallabies attack early in the second half when they had an overlap, otherwise fairly quiet. Doesn’t offer the same spark of old but still very reliable. Unfortunately, reliability doesn’t win matches when you’ve got one fewer man on the field. 9 tackles.

15. Beauden Barrett – 5.5

Spent most of the first half on defence. Absolutely destroyed by Samu Kerevi but then launched through the Wallabies line to score a try for the All Blacks.

16. Codie Taylor – 6

17. Atu Moli – 5

18. Angus Ta’avao – 4.5

19. Patrick Tuipulotu – 4.5

20. Matt Todd – 5

21. TJ Perenara – 5

22. Ngani Laumape – 6.5

Safe on defence, but a quiet game on attack until the 71st minute when he scored a miracle try.

23. George Bridge – 5.5

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Krakow | Leg 3 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series | Full Day Replay

Kubota Spears vs Tokyo Sungoliath | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry? | New Zealand & Australia | Sevens Wonders | Episode 5

Kobelco Kobe Steelers vs Toshiba Brave Lupus Tokyo | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 24 minutes ago
How 'misunderstood' Rassie Erasmus is rolling back the clock

Williams is right in that the intention of the Law is what is important here for how this is sorted out. That is what a lot of supreme courts do in working out the intention of laws poorly written. Owen Doyle’s recent article in the Irish Times seems to establish that answer. The intention was 5:3 —- Three specialist front row players on the bench, plus a secondrow, and a backrow player, hence five. The backs were allowed to cover the specialist positions of nine and ten. Finally, one utility back would be permitted, making up the three.

First of all, and most importantly, it was never the intention of the law to allow other than 5-3. I was part of the law group that determined the IRFU’s position on how things work currently. In short, we agreed with what was being proposed. It was to ensure that there must be three specialist front row players on the bench, plus a secondrow, and a backrow player, hence five. The backs were allowed to cover the specialist positions of nine and ten. Finally, one utility back would be permitted, making up the three.

When the actual law was written, the frontrow requirement was specifically defined, and written into the laws. The other replacements were not defined. Nobody considered for a moment, even in a wild dream, that a 7-1 would ever be on the cards.

Re the Arendse try: look at Arendse’s actions again. As the French players are gathering to catch he pushes one of them in the back into another French player who then fumbles the catch. As the cross field kick is now de riguer, you don’t get away with that any more. It’s good play by Arendse but nowadays it gets spotted.

2 Go to comments
I
Indrani aushal 34 minutes ago
England rout Scotland to set up Women’s Six Nations Grand Slam decider

The aftermath of falling victim to a cryptocurrency scam is often a whirlwind of anger, regret, and helplessness. After losing a significant portion of my savings to a cunning fraud scheme, I was consumed by the belief that my funds were irretrievable until I discovered TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY. This exceptional team didn’t just recover my assets; they reignited my hope in the face of digital deception. From the outset, TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY’s approach radiated competence and compassion. Their consultants listened intently to my story, validating the emotional weight of my situation while swiftly pivoting to actionable solutions. What struck me was their refusal to exploit my vulnerability, a stark contrast to other firms I had approached. They presented a transparent fee structure and realistic timelines, establishing credibility that immediately put me at ease. Their recovery strategy was a masterclass in precision. Utilizing cutting-edge blockchain analysis tools, the team dissected the scam’s infrastructure, uncovering hidden trails in the decentralized labyrinth. Rather than applying boilerplate methods, they engineered a bespoke plan tailored to the scam’s unique mechanics. Their communicators maintained a steady cadence of updates, translating technical jargon into digestible insights without ever leaving me in the dark.What truly amazed me was their adaptability. When initial attempts hit roadblocks, the team recalibrated their tactics, demonstrating both resilience and ingenuity. Their collaborative spirit shone through as they consulted external cybersecurity experts to fortify their approach, a testament to their commitment to leaving no stone unturned. The outcome exceeded my wildest expectations. TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY retrieved approximately 95% of my stolen cryptocurrency in under a month. The moment I saw the funds restored in my wallet was surreal, a victory I had dismissed as a fantasy weeks earlier. Beyond financial recovery, they equipped me with actionable advice to safeguard future transactions, transforming my traumatic experience into a learning opportunity.TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY’s integrity is its crown jewel. They never compromised ethics for expediency, even when confronting the scam’s orchestrators. Their adherence to legal frameworks and respect for privacy reinforced my trust in their operations. For those reeling from crypto scams, this team is essential. They illuminate paths to redemption with unwavering expertise. My journey with them was more than a service transaction; it was a partnership anchored in mutual respect. To anyone questioning whether recovery is possible, let my experience answer.  With TECH CYBER FORCE RECOVERY, it’s not just possible, it’s probable.CONTACT THEM FOR EXPERIENCE LIKE THIS  EMAIL Techcybersforcerecovery@cyberservices.com    TELEGRAM (@)TECHCYBERFORC

1 Go to comments
E
Eliza Galloway 42 minutes ago
Late Makazole Mapimpi try earns the Sharks win away to Edinburgh

Email: prowizardgilbertrecovery(@)  engineer.comWhatsApp: +1 (920) 408‑1234Telegram: https://t.me/Pro_Wizard_Gilbert_RecoveryI never imagined I’d become a victim of a scam—especially in the fast-moving world of cryptocurrency. When I was offered a chance to appear on a popular crypto podcast, I was excited. It seemed like a golden opportunity to gain exposure, connect with industry professionals, and build credibility within the crypto community. The podcast appeared legitimate, complete with a sleek website, professional branding, glowing testimonials, and an active social media presence.After a few exchanges with the supposed host, I was asked to pay $9,500 to secure my spot on the show. Trusting the apparent professionalism of the platform, I went ahead with the payment. I envisioned the new doors this would open—partnerships, recognition, and new opportunities. But everything changed once the payment was made.Suddenly, all communication stopped. My emails and messages went unanswered. The podcast’s website vanished, and so did their social media presence. That’s when reality hit—I had been scammed.I was devastated. Angry, embarrassed, and desperate to find a solution, I began searching for help. That’s when I discovered PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY. At first, I was skeptical, but with nothing left to lose, I decided to reach out.To my surprise, their team responded quickly and took my case seriously. Using advanced investigative tools and digital tracking techniques, they began tracing the scammer’s digital footprint. I watched as they worked tirelessly, putting the pieces together.Amazingly, PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY was able to recover 95% of my lost funds. The relief I felt was indescribable. Not only did I get back most of what I lost, but I also walked away with a hard-earned lesson about the importance of due diligence and caution in the digital world.While I wish I had never fallen into the trap, I’m incredibly thankful for the support and professionalism of PRO WIZARD GILBERT RECOVERY. They didn’t just recover my money—they helped restore my peace of mind. I’m sharing my story in hopes that it helps others avoid the same mistake and encourages them to stay vigilant in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.

2 Go to comments
J
Julio Langworth 1 hour ago
Depoortere prolonge jusqu'en 2028 avec Bordeaux-Bègles

In 2024, I received a substantial tax refund, which I saw as a golden opportunity to improve my financial situation. Eager to invest, I became interested in Bitcoin, a digital currency that many believe represents the future of finance. Unfortunately, my excitement led me to a fraudulent company that promised incredible returns on investments. Their persuasive tactics and seemingly legitimate operations drew me in, but it didn’t take long for me to realize that I had been deceived, and my hard-earned money $572,000 had vanished.Feeling devastated and hopeless after losing such a significant amount, I reached out to a friend who had faced a similar ordeal. They recommended a company called GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES , which specializes in recovering lost Bitcoin. Although I was skeptical, my desperation pushed me to contact them for help.From the very first interaction with GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES , I was impressed by their understanding and willingness to help. Their team guided me through the recovery process, providing the support I needed during this challenging time. They explained each step clearly and kept me informed throughout the entire journey. Their dedication rekindled my hope of recovering my lost funds.Thanks to the diligent efforts of GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES , I was able to reclaim my stolen Bitcoin. This experience not only restored my financial situation but also taught me invaluable lessons about the importance of conducting thorough research before making any investments. I now have a solid investment strategy in place and am much more cautious about where I allocate my funds.I want to emphasize the importance of being vigilant in the world of cryptocurrency. While Bitcoin offers tremendous potential as an investment, it also attracts scammers looking to exploit unsuspecting individuals. If you find yourself in a similar situation, I strongly encourage you to seek help from a trustworthy recovery service like GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES .Investing in Bitcoin can be a rewarding venture, but it is crucial to approach it with caution. Always perform comprehensive research and remain skeptical of offers that seem too good to be true,but if fallen victim to scam a GRAYWARE TECH SERVICES is available for you.You can reach them on whatsapp +18582759508, web at ( https://graywaretechservices.com/ )    also on Mail: (contact@graywaretechservices.com)

0 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Haves and have nots': The Six Nations numbers reveal hidden truths 'Haves and have nots': The Six Nations numbers reveal hidden truths
Search