Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallaby flyhalves 'personal' rivalry resumes after 2023 spat

Carter Gordon of the Melbourne Rebels and Noah Lolesio of the Brumbies. (Photo by Mark Nolan/Getty Images and Daniel Pockett/Getty Images)

Noah Lolesio will be out to make a statement when he locks horns with Wallabies five-eighth rival Carter Gordon in Friday night’s Super Rugby Pacific clash.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lolesio’s ACT Brumbies are heading down to take on Gordon’s Melbourne Rebels, and both their coaches admit the feud will be fuelling the young talents during the AAMI Park contest.

It’s the first time the pair have faced off since the Brumbies’ starlet mouthed “Carter Gordon?” upon scoring a try against the Rebels, just days after he was snubbed from a national team squad for the Melbourne player.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Melbourne coach Kevin Foote said the matter had become “personal” between the two playmakers, and Brumbies boss Stephen Larkham tipped Lolesio to thrive with the added fire.

“We don’t focus on one particular individual, and as a No.10 it’s very difficult sometimes to come up against your position on the field,” Larkham said.

“It’s very rare they come up against one another one-on-one, but there will be a challenge for both players in the way that they control their teams.

“I’m sure Noah is looking forward to that challenge.”

Earlier in the week, Foote said the prospect of making an early statement for new Wallabies coach Joe Schmidt would be high on the agenda for both players.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is personal, I think it is personal, that’s the truth of it,” he said.

“There’s a new Wallabies coach on top of that, so they’ll be playing for positions.

“There’s the British and Irish Lions coming. There’s Wales Tests come July.

“It’s personal for us.”

Related

While Gordon went to last year’s World Cup and struggled in the poor Wallabies side, Lolesio spent his off-season playing with French club Toulon on a short-term contract.

Larkham said the 23-year-old, 17-cap Wallaby had come back as a more confident five-eighth.

“Going over there and trying to find a connection with a new team has given him some skills to bring back and connect with our players over here,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“What he’s bringing to training is hopefully what he brings in the game, which is really good communication and intensity.”

The Brumbies have named star back-rower Rob Valetini to start despite no pre-season minutes, with Rhys van Nek starting at prop as Allan Alaalatoa recovers from his achilles rupture.

Gun Melbourne front-rower Taniela Tupou has been named to make his club debut off the bench.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
m
mitch 303 days ago

I like both but Gordon is the more natural 10, more physical, can play flat and can defend in the line. He also looks like he can control a team better than Lolesio. The Rebels have a much better pack this year and every 10 likes to play behind a dominant pack. Tupou on the bench could really see the Rebels dominate late in the game.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search