Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallaby great Campese wants 'stupid' Giteau Law scrapped immediately

Andrew Kellaway of the Wallabies looks on after losing The Bledisloe Cup (Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

Wallaby legend David Campese wants to scrap the “stupid” Giteau Law that is stopping Australia from selecting overseas players such as powerhouse lock Will Skelton who is now based in France having become a European champion with Saracens.

ADVERTISEMENT

Skelton and fellow Wallabies Rory Arnold and Tolu Latu – also based in France – plus flanker Sean McMahon in Japan, cannot be picked while playing outside Australia because they have not won at least 60 caps. That rule is top of the Australian rugby agenda after the 57-22 thrashing by the All Blacks on Saturday which meant the Wallabies had failed to win the Bledisloe Cup for 19 successive years.

In the wake of that embarrassing loss, Rugby Australia chief executive Andy Marinos has made it clear the 60 cap rule is under review but Campese believes the time for debate is over and immediate action needs to be taken to allow Wallaby coaches to pick the best available players.

Video Spacer

Wallabies captain Michael Hooper disappointed to not score during All Blacks yellow card

Video Spacer

Wallabies captain Michael Hooper disappointed to not score during All Blacks yellow card

With nearly 100 Australian players who have played at Super Rugby level playing professional rugby abroad, Campese wants all artificial barriers removed to help give what is a very young Wallaby team the opportunity to include experienced players like Skelton, who won his last cap in 2016, and Arnold with the 2023 Rugby World Cup in France on the horizon.

Campese, part of the Channel 9 and Stan sports commentary teams, told RugbyPass: “What has prompted this is the massive hiding we got against the All Blacks and of course it is a knee jerk reaction. If scrapping the rule helps us win another World Cup then get rid of it now and if the guys overseas are exceptional and their form is good enough then use them. Why wouldn’t you? It was a stupid rule anyway.

“When I went to play in Italy and then returned the Union told I had to play three games to qualify to play test rugby again and so I played for the Randwick fourths and first grade on the same day and they realised it was a waste of time!

“You have Will Skelton who is going to be a far better player because he is playing against international players week in week out in France and you cannot pick him at the moment because of the current rule.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The problem is that the system to wrong here and when we went professional that was the start of it all. In 2015 when Matt Giteau and Drew Mitchell came back for the World Cup I tried to help by finding sponsors because they weren’t getting paid by their clubs in France. We need a set up in Australia that allows the older players to stay around and pass on their knowledge to the young guys – it is something we desperately need. We are in a mess because knowledge is not being put into these young players.

La Rochelle Toulouse
Will Skelton and Ronan O’Gara (EPCR)

“The current Wallaby side is very young and will eventually be good but at the moment they don’t have the game understanding, management and knowledge. They are learning as they go along and we have another Kiwi coach in Dave Rennie. I don’t know why we continue doing this because we won two Rugby World Cups with Aussie coaches. We have an obsession with “ if you are not good enough to coach New Zealand come and coach Australia.” It’s bizarre.

Marinos was involved with the South African rugby union when they scrapped their own rules on overseas players which adds to the expectation that it will happen in Australia. “We do need to look into eligibility,” Marinos told the Sydney Morning Herald on Sunday. “I’m not saying it’s going to be alpha and omega. But it will certainly bring a lot more experience and a lot more depth across the board.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When you look at the pool of talent from which we are selecting in comparison to our biggest rivals; be it New Zealand, South Africa, Argentina, England – they have access and the ability to choose their very best players no matter where they’re playing.

“I’ve lived through this and I’ve seen this movie before, when I was in the director of rugby role in South Africa. We were faced with exactly the same scenario,” he added.

“I’m not saying what worked in South Africa is the recipe for here. But we have to look at the eligibility piece to make sure we have the best players available to play week in, week out.

“I’m not saying we have to open the gates completely. Not at all. But we have to be more specific in identifying where we need to bolster the team, so that when we put a team out on the field we have the best against the best.

“We need to be able to choose from as broad of a pool as possible. That’s all part of building a high-performance program.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Henry Arundell lined up for early England homecoming Henry Arundell lined up for early England homecoming
Search