Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wallaby great slaps Cheika with back-handed vote of confidence

Michael Cheika (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Wallaby great David Campese is backing Michael Cheika, who has lost 13 of his last 16 matches in charge of Australia, to continue in the role because there is “nobody” to take over.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cheika has received another vote of confidence from Australian rugby chiefs heading into Saturday’s clash with Italy in Padua and Campese can understand why that has happened despite the recent results. He told BT Sport; “A year out from the World Cup you cannot change now because unfortunately, at the moment, there is nobody in Australia. We used to play differently but at the moment we have two Kiwis and one South African coaches in Super Rugby and there is no where to go in Australia to be a Super Rugby coach.

“There is no process – even Cheik had to go overseas to become Australia coach and we are struggling at the moment. In New Zealand there are ex-players coaching who come through a system and we haven’t quite worked that out yet. Cheik said that after the World Cup he is going to retire.”

Rugby Australia boss Raelene Castle is adamant the head coach will take the squad to Japan, however, his assistant coaches could be under threat from a planned end of year review that will follow the final European tour test with England at Twickenham on November 24.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

While critics are focussing on his assistant coaches, Cheika has complete faith in Stephen Larkham, Nathan Grey, Simon Raiwalui and Mick Byrne, but it could be taken out of his hands. Italy have failed to beat the Wallabies in 17 attempts and this match follows a 9-6 tryless loss to Wales which only heaped more pressure on Cheika and his fellow coaches.

However, Castle has reiterated her position that Cheika has RA’s support even after an eighth loss this year. “At the end of the day, Michael’s contract goes through to the World Cup,” said Castle. “We’ve said that publicly and we’re continuing to support that stance. There is a review at the end of every year. There is no doubt that that’s become even more important because of our performances but the review will identify the areas that we need to focus on as we move on to that very important World Cup next year.”

Former Wallaby great Michael Lyangh spelled out the reality of the situation to RugbyPass last month stating; “He (Cheika) will stay because a) there is nobody else and b)there is a financial issue that the ARU wouldn’t be able to meet. So, on both those fronts the logistics of trying to get rid of Michael are not right.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Prop Sekope Kepu, who has played in 101 tests to match David Campese, insists Cheika has protected the players from the flak from home and abroad. “He’s dealt with it in his own way and not let it affect the team too much,” said 32-year-old Kepu. “ I don’t read the media and that stuff. That is part of how I look at it. You just worry about what is going on in the team environment. As long as we are honest with each other in this team that is all that matters to me. It’s another week and the chance to chase the goal that we want and the goals we have set ourselves.

“It has been a tough year but the boys are sticking tight and we’re trusting that we keep chipping away at things. The results will come. The World Cup is still 12 months away but this week is another massive challenge and a chance for us to build. It’s a good chance to come away strong for the rest of the year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain Kieran Read names his 2025 British and Irish Lions captain
Search