Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Warren Gatland calls for World Cup revamp after stern Portugal test

By PA
Portugal celbrate scoring a try/ PA

Warren Gatland believes that a 24-nation Rugby World Cup would help to grow the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

An expansion from the current 20 countries for Australia 2027 or the United States four years later has been mooted in some quarters.

The current tournament in France has already been highlighted by outstanding performances from lower-ranked teams.

Uruguay pushed France for large parts of a gripping Pool A encounter before losing 27-12, while Portugal gave Gatland’s Wales plenty to ponder and Chile had their moments in games against Japan and Samoa.

“I thought Uruguay were outstanding – it is brilliant for the game,” Wales head coach Gatland said, following a 28-8 victory over Portugal.

“Portugal were fantastic and showed a lot of enterprise, and you could argue that Uruguay were pretty unlucky in a few situations (against France).

“I think it is important that we continue to develop from a rugby perspective to help develop these tier two nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There might be a situation where we can increase the number of teams in the World Cup to 24, and that would continue to help grow the game.

“That is an important aspect. You don’t want top tier nations dominating, you want upsets – as long as I am not a part of it!

“I think it’s a real positive going forward to see teams competing and pushing other teams close.”

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
2
14
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
1.3
6
Entries

Portugal returned to the World Cup stage following a 16-year absence when they tackled Wales at Stade de Nice.

ADVERTISEMENT

They qualified for the tournament by winning a repechage competition in Dubai, and full-back Nuno Sousa Guedes has no doubt that regular exposure against leading nations is what Portugal require.

Guedes and company made life tough for Wales, trailing by just four points approaching half-time, while they did not concede a bonus-point try until the game’s closing seconds.

“If we could keep playing games like this, it is the main thing,” Guedes said.

“For the kids back home who are starting out, it would be a very good step.

“In Portugal, it is always soccer. We want to show the world that it is not only soccer.

“We have the numbers in terms of rugby and some good kids coming up. I think we have the capacity.”

Rugby World Cup

Pool A
P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
France
2
2
0
0
8
2
New Zealand
2
1
1
0
5
3
Italy
1
1
0
0
5
4
Uruguay
1
0
1
0
0
5
Namibia
2
0
2
0
0
Pool B
P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
Ireland
2
2
0
0
10
2
South Africa
1
1
0
0
4
3
Scotland
1
0
1
0
0
4
Tonga
1
0
1
0
0
5
Romania
1
0
1
0
0
Pool C
P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
Wales
2
2
0
0
10
2
Australia
1
1
0
0
5
3
Fiji
1
0
1
0
2
4
Georgia
1
0
1
0
0
5
Portugal
1
0
1
0
0
Pool D
P
W
L
D
PF
PA
PD
BP T
BP-7
BP
Total
1
Samoa
1
1
0
0
5
2
Japan
1
1
0
0
5
3
England
1
1
0
0
4
4
Argentina
1
0
1
0
0
5
Chile
2
0
2
0
0
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

17 Comments
A
Apex Gamer 460 days ago

I think increasing each pool by 1 is a great way to not only allow more lower tier nations but if they adjust the pool standings to (1+2 advance to QF's, 3+4 automatically qualify for the next RWC and 5+6 are left for the qualifying matches) this will allow more lower tier teams a
chance to fight for the 2 spots to qualify as
opposed to the current
1 spot which more often
than not is taken by
either a tier 1 or strong
tier 2. This will mean a
longer tournament but
it's only every 4 years so
an extra 2-3 weeks is
fine by me.

G
Graeme 460 days ago

They should slightly follow the 7s format with all the 3rd place teams play a semi & then final based in just one city, then similarly all the 4th place teams in another city and then all the 5th place teams in another city….call them bowl, plate & shield and give the Tier 2 teams some reward to aim for whilst helping them with development

M
Mark 460 days ago

There are already enough teams within Europe to have a European Cup the two years between the World Cup presenting a bigger world stage presence. I think Gatlands idea of increasing the numbers in the World Cup is spot on, USA, Canada, Zambia etc are missing this year both of those countries are increasing with teams.

C
CO 461 days ago

Why not have games between tier two and tier one tweaked so red card thresholds are lower for the tier one sides.

For example a tier two player not rolling away is ignored whilst a tier one player is red carded and banned for three weeks.

Tier one lifting in the lineouts not allowed and a prop just take all shots at goal whilst flyhalf has to throw into lineouts and Fullback shifted into hooker for the scrums.

I
Ian 461 days ago

What is needed is two 12-team competitions that run concurrently. Portugal played well, but were still easily beaten by a weak Wales team. The Tier 2 nations need to be playing each other more for them to grow. Have a "Tier 2 World Cup" where the winner goes into the Knockout stages for the "Tier 1" World Cup.

R
Rob 461 days ago

It’s certainly a tough call to make, if you’re adding 4 more teams do you add them to make pools of 6 or so you make a fifth pool. I’d love to see more teams in it but if we add more teams squad size should increase as well.

M
Michael 461 days ago

Absolutely agree with this
These nations are the sports future. In a global sense. Better competitions are essential for rugby's growth.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 43 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search