Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Watch: Blues pounce on Crusaders mistake to score controversial try

Blake Gibson. (Photo by Brett Phibbs/Photosport)

Despite having countless opportunities inside the Crusaders’ 22 to put points on the board, the Blues have had to rely on their counter-attacking instinct to keep themselves in Sunday’s Super Rugby Aotearoa showdown.

ADVERTISEMENT

The top of the table clash got off to a slow start, with the two forward packs feeling each other out in the early stages of the game – with neither side really gaining the ascendancy.

Both packs took turns struggling at scrum time, with the Blues looking ominous early – winning multiple scrum penalties inside the Crusaders but not making anything of their opportunities before the penalties started flying the other way.

Video Spacer

The panel from the Aotearoa Rugby Pod look at the way Richie Mo’unga is playing and how it should be a promising sign for anyone the All Blacks 2021 campaign and onward.

Video Spacer

The panel from the Aotearoa Rugby Pod look at the way Richie Mo’unga is playing and how it should be a promising sign for anyone the All Blacks 2021 campaign and onward.

It was the Crusaders who scored the first try of the game, with Jack Goodhue pouncing on a perfectly waited Bryn Hall grubber that Akira Ioane wasn’t able to deal with in-goal – but the Blues struck back shortly after.

The Crusaders launched an attack from inside their own half and left wing Leicester Fainga’anuku found himself in a glaring hole – but couldn’t quite hold onto the pass.

Blues No 12 Harry Plummer picked the ball up off the ground and surged ahead, with the ball spread wide to right wing Bryce Heem from the ensuing ruck.

Heem was brought to ground and the ball was spun into the middle of the park – where the Blues’ attacking plays had so often broken down earlier in the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fan favourite Caleb Clarke found the ball in his possession and, turning towards his own goalline, threw a line ball to flanker Blake Gibson – who was able to crush over the line with some attention from the final Crusaders defender.

The Crusaders challenged the score, however. Thanks to the way Clarke turned his body, it appeared that his pass had travelled forward – and the decision was sent upstairs.

Fans minds were no doubt cast back to last week, when a number of curious refereeing decisions were reached regarding forward passes but after a few looks upstairs, the try was awarded – and rightly so.

The Crusaders struck back later in the half with a typical lineout drive, with Codie Taylor the eventual scorer.

ADVERTISEMENT

That, coupled with a solitary penalty to Richie Mo’unga, gave the visiting Crusaders a 17-8 lead heading into halftime.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search