Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Watch: Curry twins' amusing shared player of the match award

(Screen grab via BT Sport)

Ex-England international Austin Healey was at his mischievous best on Friday night when naming both Curry twins, Tom and Ben, as his man of the match after Sale’s semi-final clinching league win at Bristol. The Sharks were 36-20 winners at Ashton Gate to secure guaranteed passage to the last four of the Gallagher Premiership.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both twins were back row starters for Alex Sanderson’s side. Ben – who made 36 metres from six carries – scored a first-half try and put in 14 tackles during his hour-long involvement while Tom registered a gigantic tackle count of 24.

With both forwards catching Healey’s eye, the BT Sport pundit decided to name both Currys as the man of the match and it left Rich James from tournament sponsors Gallagher in a post-game live TV pickle as he only had one medal.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

In the end, presenter Sarra Elgan Easterby suggested that James hang the medal around the neck of the coat-wearing Ben. Here is how her presentation interview unfolded:

SEE: I’m going to ask Rich James from Gallagher to present the boys, I don’t know how he is going to manage it. Give it to Ben, you’re the eldest. Congratulations, gents. This is a first for us by the way, two players of the match. I can’t work out if Austin shared it because he couldn’t tell you apart or because he didn’t want a family squabble. But congratulations. Nice to be playing with each other again?

BC: Really nice. Probably results haven’t gone our way recently so definitely for us group it was good for us to get a win so we can kick on.

SEE: You both made some impact on that game, fair play, and you booked yourself a semi-final spot for only the fourth time in the club’s history so that is huge.

ADVERTISEMENT

TC: Yeah, but it means nothing unless we kick on. It’s another semi-final so again we have got to keep attacking it and get the home semi and whatever happens, happens.

SEE: Let’s talk a little about that game because the weather wasn’t great in that first half but when needed you scored one and you almost scored another one. Do you feel you could, should have bagged yourself a little bit more?

BC: It would have been nice to get five points, but fair play to Gus (Warr) and George (Ford), they controlled the game really well. A lot of those were due to them controlling the game, putting the forwards in the right positions so a lot of credit goes to them.

SEE: You had lost the last three of four league games coming into this, hitting a slump at the wrong time, and it was a tight match at half-time so what was the chat at the break?

ADVERTISEMENT

TC: We had a pretty rubbish training week, to be honest with ourselves in terms of the team run was a bit down, a few dropped balls. But fair play to the lads, it shows where the group is at. It comes to game day and we are on it and at the end of the day, that is what matters. There are a lot of things that go deeper than just throwing a ball about together. The off-field stuff Alex is doing to build that resilience, this team four years ago wouldn’t have done that today so credit to the lads.

SEE: How big a part does the psychological side play at this stage of the season?

BC: It’s massive. Bristol would have easily come back into that. There were only six, seven points in it at half-time. We could have easily thrown that away. That last 20 of the first half, a lot of credit goes to the lads.

SEE: It’s now all about getting a home semi?

TC: It’s about winning the next game. It sounds really cliché but that is how you do it.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 25 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search