Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Watch: Will Jordan and Beauden Barrett combine for scorching long-range effort

(Source/Sky Sport NZ)

After a rare drought of four tests without a try, All Black right wing Will Jordan exploded at Marvel Stadium in Melbourne to score another incredible long range five pointer.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Crusaders fullback combined brilliantly with reserve first five Beauden Barrett to find a weakness in behind the Wallabies defence in the 55th minute.

Jordan snatched Barrett’s chip kick out of the air on the full before putting a deadly left foot step on Wallabies fullback Andrew Kellaway who had raced up to try shut down the kick.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Wallabies cover defence could not close on him as the 24-year-old speedster turned on the jets to outpace three defenders and score his 20th test try in as many appearances.

Jordan’s try gave the All Blacks a 31-13 lead with 25 minutes remaining which many thought would have sealed the game but a massive Wallabies comeback saw the home side take the lead.

Two tries to Andrew Kellaway closed the gap dramatically before a brilliant try to Pete Samu down the left hand side levelled scores at 34-all.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies took an unlikely 37-34 lead when Nic White landed a penalty goal from nearly 50 metres out with minutes remaining.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Wallabies quickly turned the ball over after the kickoff by sealing off the ruck and conceding a penalty.

The All Blacks turned down a shot at goal for the draw and boldly kicked to the corner in search of a win only for the maul to collapse. The Wallabies pounced on the fallen carrier and forced a holding on penalty with a minute and a half remaining.

Controversially, referee Mathieu Raynal called a scrum to the All Blacks after ruling Bernard Foley had wasted enough time clearing to touch following the penalty.

The All Blacks right wing was called upon to make a match-winning play again after the siren as the All Blacks stole the match at the death following the crucial turnover by Foley.

As the All Blacks shifted the ball right, Jordan was able to draw in two defenders and interest Marika Koroibete enough to free up fullback Jordie Barrett with an offload.

Barrett went low and scored in the tackle of Koroibete to give the All Blacks a 39-37 win in a thrilling escape for the visitors.

All Blacks head coach Ian Foster praised the ‘level heads’ that showed enough composure to construct the final try but ideally would have liked his side to have shown more control in the final quarter.

“We would have liked to finish off the game better than we did,” head coach Foster said of the Wallabies late comeback.

“We got ourselves in a position to do that [at 31-13].

“Perhaps what was our strength two weeks ago became our weakness in that last quarter. We let through a couple of tries through tackles that should have been made.

“We will go away and look at that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 19 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search