Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wayne Pivac sheds light on why he is sticking by Dan Biggar and not starting Callum Sheedy for Wales

(Photo by PA)

Rejuvenated Wales boss Wayne Pivac has explained why he decided against handing Callum Sheedythe second-half hero off the bench the last day against England – the first Guinness Six Nations start of his career versus Italy this Saturday in Rome.   

ADVERTISEMENT

While Dan Biggar has recovered from the leg injury that saw him limp off shortly after half-time at the Principality versus the English, the meagre calibre of an opponent in Italy presented Wales with an opportunity to give players who are not usually starters for their country the chance to play from the start at Stadio Olimpico.

Two years ago, when Wales last won the Guinness Six Nations Grand Slam, then coach Warren Gatland made ten changes to his XV following the round one away win over France, handing the first championship starts to Thomas Young and Jonah Holmes and giving the captaincy to Jonathan Davies as Alun Wyn Jones was benched for the round two fixture in Rome.

Video Spacer

Wales’ Dan Lydiate guests on RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Wales’ Dan Lydiate guests on RugbyPass Offload

This much reshuffled Wales only managed a low frills 26-15 that came minus a four-try bonus point – they scored just tries, their first coming on 53 minutes – and in contrast, Pivac is heading to Rome with all guns blazing having made just two changes to the XV that defeated England 40-24 on February 27. 

Cory Hill and Gareth Davies have come in for the banged-up Adam Beard and the injured Kieran Hardy, with no promotion for Sheedy who stepped off the Wales bench to nervelessly fire over 13 points off the tee against the English and steer his team to their third successive win of 2021. 

However, rather than hand Sheedy the No10 jersey for the Italian job, Pivac has stuck with keeping him in reserve and starting the long-serving Biggar whom he says is fit to play. “Where we are going with the games, the way we want to play, the way we want to start games when there is a lot of intensity, a lot of fresh bodies around, defences are in your face, it suits the way we want to play through that period of the game having Dan there.

“When Callum comes on, Willis (Halaholo) comes on, it gives us opportunities to probably play slightly differently and mix it up a little bit more. Certainly, they are two very good players. We are fortunate to have them both and they are different types of players. That is the way we are running it at the moment and it’s working so far.”

ADVERTISEMENT

While Biggar didn’t feature for his club Northampton in either of the Six Nations down weeks, Sheedy appeared twice for Bristol and while some Wales fans might worry about this workload for a 25-year-old who only made his Test level debut last November, Pivac has had no concerns about his back-up out-half being kept ticking over in the Gallagher Premiership. 

“We talk to the coaches each week and we exchange information on how they have trained, the volumes, that sort of thing, and each coach is slightly different in how they take that information and work with it,” continued the Wales coach. “Pat Lam is very good. Obviously, we know each other very well. Callum’s training week is tailored so that he can get through these games of rugby. He is important to Bristol and they have the right to use him.

“Going back there he knows he has got his work-ons from us and he continues to do that under the guidance of Pat and his coaching group. We’re comfortable with him going back there because it is a good environment and he is still learning his trade. But he has got such a level head on him for a young man he takes it in his stride, to be honest, and some players would struggle more than others really but he is one who takes it in his stride.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 11 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

41 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

41 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland centre Bundee Aki ends speculation with decision over future Ireland centre Bundee Aki ends speculation with decision over future
Search