'We always have problem clubs... but everybody is very honest'
Premiership Rugby chief executive Simon Massie-Taylor has admitted there are no quick fixes as the English professional club game battles its biggest crisis, but added that bold decisions will be made to lay better foundations for the game. His clear message is that clubs need to agree on a likely vigorous shake-up and align with each other, which has often proved beyond them during 27 years of professionalism.
The Gallagher Premiership, England’s flagship domestic competition, is in meltdown after Wasps and Worcester were suspended amid financial difficulties which threaten their existence. Wasps say they are likely to enter administration while Worcester have been suspended from Premiership action for the rest of this season with relegation to follow after the club’s partial liquidation.
The freefall of both clubs has reignited the debate over sustainability at the top level and Premiership Rugby is examining a range of options to strengthen clubs’ financial resilience, which will include giving consideration to the league’s structure and the visibility of clubs’ financial information.
Asked if he had concerns about other Premiership clubs, Massie-Taylor said: “We haven’t been given any direct red flags from clubs, but I will be really honest and say that until I get complete financial oversight of clubs I can’t give you a direct answer on that.”
Former Wasps player and rugby director Nigel Melville, who is chairman of Premiership Rugby’s investor board, added: “The time is right for a reset and everybody agrees. When it comes down to a vote, ‘what’s in it for me?’ always comes forward. There is a general feeling that change is necessary to move forward.
“We always have problem clubs. It’s not always the same one. It depends on what the issue is. We are working really well together at the moment. We have our issues now and again, but everybody is very straight with each other and very honest.”
The Premiership is now operating with eleven clubs after the season began with 13 just over a month ago. Massie-Taylor admitted that grand plans for an eventual expansion to 14 were short-sighted. “Our ambition to move to a 14-team league was short-sighted. We need to look at a lesser number,” he said. “Exactly what that number is, is to be decided. I know there is a lot of speculation going on at the moment.
“But there is an element of not knocking down everything. We have some great elements to Premiership Rugby and the competitiveness and quality of rugby is one of them. But we need to create a higher standard and a more integrated second tier (Championship). There are no quick fixes here but we have a big responsibility to take some.
“I am not going to dwell on the issues that we have, but they all begin with C. One is the calendar, one is the cost base, which is not linked up to our commercial system, and from a governance point of view, we have issues over what we can control and we also have a huge amount of conflict. Most important to me is that we create a more robust structure and governance model and that we have stricter oversight.
“That is important to maintain the integrity of the system we have got, to avoid some of these situations we are in at the moment, but we also need to attract future investors into the clubs. We have a very loyal (investor) base, some of whom have been around for a long time, but some are fatigued and that is understandable. We need to get a new way of investment into clubs and we need to create an environment where they feel they can invest into.”
Massie-Taylor continued that with the Premiership now two clubs down from its season starting point it will leave a financial dent. Champions Leicester, for instance, do not have another Premiership home game until late November as their next two league fixtures at Mattioli Woods Welford Road were against Wasps and Worcester.
“It will have limited impact centrally, but clearly clubs who had sold tickets or season tickets are going to have issues,” Massie-Taylor added. “There is going to be a financial impact this season with clubs not participating.”
Well I'm glad he's finally said the plan to go to 14 is scrapped. I assumed as much, but it's good to hear him admit that publicly. Incredibly silly idea.
I like 10, as I've said here before. I've heard 2 divisions of 10 a piece, but I agree with those who say 20 fully pro clubs is too many.
I'd argue for a 10 team Premiership, 8 team Championship. Then you have all 18 participate in a Cup competition, mostly for second teams & non-internationals at the Prem level, and to give a few extra matches to the Championship teams. Groups of 3, group winners plus best 2 runners up go to knockouts. Put the cup competition during the international breaks, and actually have international breaks like football (and URC).
It sounds like whatever new structure in place will come into effect for 2024-25. So 11 next season, 1 sent down, no one up. For 24-25, you go to the new structure, with 1 up, 1 down, but ring-fenced below the Championship.
One question I would have is how this effects the Champions Cup, namely, Premiership's place in it. Feel like ECPR wouldn't let 80% of the league qualify. So maybe give URC 10 places, keep Top 14 to 8, and have us contribute 6. Then for each league you get roughly 60% qualifying for the Champions Cup, and a tidy 16 left over for the Challenge Cup.