Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We are in the entertainment business, that game certainly provided it'

By PA
Montpellier's French centre Thomas Darmon (C) is tackled by Ospreys' Welsh flanker Rhys Davies (L) and Ospreys' Welsh flanker Justin Tipuric (R). (Photo by Geoff Caddick / AFP) (Photo by GEOFF CADDICK/AFP via Getty Images)

Ospreys head coach Toby Booth described his side’s clash against Montpellier as a “magnificent spectacle” after a 35-29 win gave the Welsh region a great chance of reaching the knock-out stages of the Heineken Champions Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

A try from Morgan Morris two minutes from time sealed victory and crucially gave Ospreys an additional bonus point to take them to 10 points in Pool B.

Barring a remarkable sequence of results, that tally is likely to prove enough for qualification, although for added insurance they may still need something from their final fixture at Leicester on Friday.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Alex Cuthbert (two), Justin Tipuric and Morris scored Ospreys’ tries, with the kicking of Cai Evans proving key as he succeeded with three penalties and three conversions.

Montpellier outscored their hosts five tries to four, with Paul Willemse (two) Bastien Chalureau, Thomas Darmon and Cobus Reinach the men to touch down, but they will rue the four missed kicks which cost them nine points.

Booth, whose side beat the French champions 21-10 away from home last month, said: “We are in the entertainment business and that game certainly provided it as it went from one end to another.

“After the game over there, we knew they would come over with a point to prove but we just found a way to win.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Cai (Evans) has grabbed his opportunity as it’s been a difficult journey for him with injuries but now he’s really thriving and fulfilling the talent he’s got.”

Ospreys goal-kicking hero Evans said: “After beating them down there, we knew they would come flying out the blocks but in the end we managed to win.

“Neither side could get a substantial lead and the game went down to the wire so I’m pleased we came out on the right side of the result.

“My last miss made it theatrical but it provided good entertainment for the neutral.”

Montpellier director of rugby Philippe Saint-Andre felt his side did not help themselves in Swansea.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We had opportunities to win but we had little success on the kicking front,” he said.

“Ospreys deserved to beat us at home and they showed a lot of commitment tonight but we gave away a couple of soft tries.

“It was a good game for the neutral but we missed too many points from our kicking game and it’s not often that you score five tries away from home and still lose.”

Despite their loss, Montpellier are still in the competition and a bonus-point win over London Irish at home next weekend will probably see them qualify.

Captain Willemse said: “It’s a good challenge as we need five points but if we get them and progress, we can still go all the way.

“Our attack was good tonight although we made a few mistakes defensively but the two points we picked up makes sure that we are still in the mix.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search