Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We aren't going to get a break': How a cruel quirk of the draw has forced massive changes to the Chiefs

Liam Messam. (Photo by Michael Bradley/Getty Images

Clayton McMillan has made twenty positional changes to the Chiefs’ match-day team for this evening’s clash from the Blues and while the first-year coach isn’t expecting his young side to roll over against the comparative experience of their opposition, it’s a decision that’s effectively been forced by this year’s unusual draw.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the Chiefs had their two Super Rugby Aotearoa byes in the fifth and tenth rounds of the competition last year, they’ve come in the first and sixth rounds in 2021.

That handed them an extra week of preparation at the start of the season but means they’ll have to face a relentless gauntlet of matches as their campaign progresses.

Video Spacer

The panel of Ross Karl, James Parsons and Bryn Hall talk about all the action and news from the week of rugby in New Zealand and across the world.

Video Spacer

The panel of Ross Karl, James Parsons and Bryn Hall talk about all the action and news from the week of rugby in New Zealand and across the world.

There are no byes in Super Rugby Trans-Tasman, which kicks of immediately after the Aotearoa final.

Had the Chiefs not made the final, they’d be able to enjoy a rest next weekend and then roll out close to their top side for the remaining five or six matches of the season.

That’s not how the cards have fallen, however, with last year’s cellar dwellers coming back from two losses to kick off the season and winning five on the trot, catapulting them into the final alongside the ever-classy Crusaders.

While that’s obviously exactly where the Chiefs want to be, it does make things tricky for McMillan and his charges.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Where our byes have fallen, we’ve not only had to play finals rugby for the last five or six weeks but we aren’t going to get a break from this point either,” McMillan said after naming his time to take on the Blues.

“It would be nice to have a week off but I guess most other teams are having that next week, aren’t they? We’re certainly not disappointed about having to play next week so it is what it is.

“If the Blues had got a bonus point last week it certainly would have forced our hand a little bit more to keep rolling the guys out. We’ve been fortunate – but I reiterate that our guys are pretty dinged up and it’s not just this week and next week, it’s another five or six weeks straight after that.”

The Chiefs’ opening Trans-Tasman matches are against the three sides that have qualified for the Super Rugby AU finals, the Western Force, Brumbies and Reds. There will be few opportunities amongst those matches to rest players, with means today’s dead-rubber clash with the Blues is really the final chance that some senior Chiefs will have to take a break before everything goes back on the line again from next weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

As such, McMillan has made a huge number of changes, handing potential Chiefs debuts to six players and naming 11 men who are in their inaugural year of Super Rugby.

There’s some experience on the bench in the form of All Blacks Nathan Harris and Liam Messam, who have more Super Rugby caps between them than the rest of the side altogether.

While it could just be ‘coach speak’ from McMillan, he’s hopeful that his youthful side can still front up against a Blues team boasting seven All Blacks.

“This game on the weekend gives those who haven’t played a significant amount an opportunity to one, demonstrate that they’re good enough to play in the final the following week and two, put their hand up for regular selection through Trans-Tasman.

“I’ve made it really clear that there’s probably seven spots up for grabs in the match-day 23 against the Crusaders in a week’s time. Everybody that plays on the week has a massive amount to play for.

“There’s no guarantee that they’re in there any longer than the next couple of weeks but a bit like the other fellas, a good performance might force our hand to keep them in.

“That’s not to say that we won’t get a result this week by rolling out the team that we’ve done. [Winning is] certainly our intention.”

McMillan reiterated what assistant David Hill has said earlier in the week, all the Chiefs attentions have been on today’s match – not looking forward to the final against the Crusaders.

“We respect that the Blues are going to be a formidable opposition up there,” he said. “They’ll obviously be hurting that they’re not going to be playing the final week.

“We need to ensure a young team that’s going out this week are given every opportunity to put their best foot forward and if we’ve got out our eyes or our thoughts too far forward, we’re just setting them up for failure and that’s not us.”

Tonight’s match kicks off at 7:05pm NZT, with Blues and Chiefs Women’s selections going head to head in the curtain-raiser at 4:35pm.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The Waikato young gun solving one of rugby players' 'obvious problems' Injury breeds opportunity for Waikato entrepreneur
Search