Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We have always been open to conversations with Wales and Scotland about the possibility of Team GB'

England Sevens team in huddle. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

England rugby chiefs insist they not scrapping their Sevens squad but admit they are in talks with Wales and Scotland in a bid to create a Great Britain team aimed at mounting a serious challenge for gold at future Olympic Games.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, it is understood the Scots are lukewarm to the idea of giving up their own separate identity on the HSBC World Rugby Sevens Series, particularly as they are the country that created the shortened version of the sport which made its Olympic debut in Rio.

England, Scotland and Wales are currently involved in the Sevens series with the top four teams automatically gaining places in the draw in next year’s Olympics in Japan and the other slots will be decided after qualifying tournaments.

Great Britain claimed silver in Rio after being beaten by Fiji in the final and Nigel Melville, the acting Rugby Football Union chief executive told RugbyPass any discussions over a GB team were at a early stage and did not signal the demise of the England Sevens squad.

The RFU is looking to cut costs of around £10m a year due to a predicted drop in future earnings forcing belt tightening. Last year 60 staff were made redundant by the sport’s biggest and richest Union and further cuts are in the pipeline.

Continue reading below…
Watch: Eddie Jones speaks to RugbyPass ahead of Six Nations game against Italy.

Video Spacer

However, Melville said: “We are always looking for ways to make our teams more competitive and Team GB is one of the models we have been looking at but we are not about to axe the England Sevens squad. That is not what we have been talking about. Could we change the way we do Sevens? Absolutely. There are many different things we could do and if we went down the GB route we could put other teams into the European circuit.

ADVERTISEMENT

“People are just jumping on one thing and saying that we are going to axe the Sevens team and that is clearly not the case. We have always been open to conversations with Wales and Scotland about the possibility of Team GB being on the Sevens circuit at some point to make us more competitive at the Olympics.”

The RFU spent £70million on the professional game last season but the majority is committed to legally binding agreements with the Premiership clubs and payments to England players. The RFU signed a £220million, eight-year deal with Premiership clubs in 2016. The RFU is forecast to lose more than £10million next year because of the costs of the World Cup in Japan and the resulting loss of up to four autumn Test matches.

Watch: Nathan Hughes speaks exclusively to RugbyPass

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 16 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING George Skivington issues injury update on prop duo George Skivington issues injury update on prop duo
Search