Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We have spoken': What Lions will do in case of Bulls cancellation

(Photo by David Rogers/Pool/AFP via Getty Images)

Lions assistant Steve Tandy has outlined what might happen if next Saturday’s scheduled match versus the Bulls in Pretoria is cancelled following a virus outbreak amongst Jake White’s squad. He also gave an update on the health of Robbie Henshaw’s hamstring and added that Stuart Hogg is an injury doubt to take his place on the Lions bench for this Wednesday’s game versus the Sharks. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Henshaw pulled up lame last week with a hamstring issue that Lions boss Warren Gatland assured was a minor strain and that prognosis appeared to be on the money following the update provided by Tandy on Tuesday afternoon from Johannesburg. 

“Robbie is tracking really well. He was doing a little bit of running today, so he is looking good,” said the defence coach, who went on to reveal a concern surrounding Hogg, the full-back who skippered the Lions from full-back in last Saturday’s win over the Sigma Lions just a week after he was just a sub for Exeter’s Gallagher Premiership final loss. 

Video Spacer

Warren Gatland discusses a potential Lions positional switch

Video Spacer

Warren Gatland discusses a potential Lions positional switch

Having done well in his Lions appearance in the No15 shirt, Hogg was chosen on Monday amongst the replacements to provide backline cover this Wednesday to a starting XV that has Liam Williams selected at full-back and Dan Biggar as the starting No10. “Stuart is carrying a little bit of a dead leg,” explained Tandy. “We will make a decision on that tomorrow morning and see how he holds up.”

Aside from that injury situation concerning Henshaw and Hogg, the major news coming out of South Africa was that next Saturday’s third Lions game in the southern hemisphere was in jeopardy following some failed virus tests in the Bulls squad. Nothing officially has been said about what will definitely happen, but Tandy admitted that the issue of a possible call-off had been talked about amongst Gatland and his staff.  

“We haven’t confirmed anything but we have spoken. We will travel down to Cape Town over the weekend so we would probably give an extra day off, potentially maybe train a little bit harder on the Friday but again that would be something that we would firm up when we get confirmation around what will happen.

“There has nothing been confirmed. It hasn’t affected the mood in the camp. The boys trained well this morning [Tuesday] and it’s just about gearing up for tomorrow night (against the Sharks). The focus is on us getting better and improving and building on the last couple of performances. There are a couple of more people making their debuts for the Lions, so it’s exciting times.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Tandy accepted that the virus issues encountered by the Springboks on Monday, where they had their training closed down, and now with the Bulls had heightened awareness even further amongst the Lions about their own precautions. “Definitely, it’s something we are constantly reminding and trying to have no risk in what we are doing. 

“We are tested three, four times a week and everything is sanitised and everyone is on their best behaviour around that because no one what to jeopardise this tour. We have come here to do a job and we don’t want to leave anything to get in the way of that.”

Cancellation of the Springboks versus Georgia game on Friday and the following day’s Lions versus Bulls match would leave the Georgians and Lions at an expected late loose end. Might that hypothetically be solved by the Lions taking on the Georgians instead and if not, would the loss of a match hinder the Test team selection chances of those players likely to have been facing the Bulls? 

“Anything is possible through Covid. We have seen that. If there is an opportunity if a game is called off to play a game then that would be great for us and for whoever else is looking for a game,” said Tandy, who also spoke about the possibility of the Lions playing an internal match amongst themselves at some stage if there are any cancellations. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It would depend on what point of the tour we are at… we will weigh up whether we feel we can give the boys and an extra day off or whether we feel we need that internal sort of match or maybe a heavier-loaded contact day. As coaches we talk about it but through Covid what you learn is you have to adapt. 

“You could have the best-laid plans to do things but things move really quickly and things can change quickly. It is just being prepared for whatever comes our way at whatever period of time and also just seeing where the group are, whether they need more contact time or if we can give them an extra day off so they can recover. We will just adapt that as we go along.

“It is only as difficult as you make it,” he said about the selection consequences of some players possibly having a game less to impress. “You have to adapt and what will be will be. We see the boys training, how they do in that. We’d like to think everyone would have had a chance to put their name in the hat for the Test series – we are watching these boys every day. With the competition, it is already going to be difficult because the standard in training and around the games is huge so I don’t think it will make too much of a difference.

“Other people will be talking and dealing with that,” he added about speculation that the tour won’t return to Johannesburg as planned after the July 24 first Test in Cape Town and could instead be concluded there with the second and third Tests. “If we end up in Cape Town we will deal with that. If we come back to Johannesburg we are fully prepared for whatever happens.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

H
Hellhound 45 minutes ago
South Africa player ratings | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

There is this thing going around against Siya Kolisi where they don't want him to be known as the best national captain ever, so they strike him down in ratings permanently whenever they can. They want McCaw and reckons he is the best captain ever. I disagree.


Just like they refuse to see SA as the best team and some have even said that should the Boks win a third WC in a row, they will still not be the best team ever. Even if they win every game between now and the WC. That is some serious hate coming SA's way.


Everyone forget how the McCaw AB's intimidated refs, was always on the wrong side, played on the ground etc. Things they would never have gotten away with today. They may have a better win ratio, but SA build depth, not caring about rank inbetween WC's until this year.


They weren't as bad inbetween as people claim, because non e of their losses was big ones and they almost never faced the strongest Bok team outside of the WC, allowing countries like France and Ireland to rise to the top unopposed.


Rassie is still at it, building more depth, getting more young stars into the fold. By the time he leaves (I hope never) he will leave a very strong Bok side for the next 15- 20 years. Not everyone will play for 20 years, but each year Rassie acknowledge the young stars and get them involved and ready for international rugby.


Not everyone will make it to the WC, but those 51/52 players will compete for those spots for the WC. They will deliver their best. The future of the Boks is in very safe hands. The only thing that bothers me is Rassie's health. If he can overcome it, rugby looks dark for the rest of the rugby world. He is already the greatest coach in WR history. By the time he retires, he will be the biggest legend any sport has ever seen

4 Go to comments
J
JW 59 minutes ago
'They smelt it': Scott Robertson says Italy sensed All Blacks' vulnerability

No where to be seen OB!


The crosses for me for the year where (from memory);


This was a really hard one to nail down as the first sign of a problem, now that I've asked myself to think about it. I'd say it all started with his decision to not back form and fit players after all the injuries, and/or him picking players for the future, rather ones that could play right now.


First he doesn't replace Perofeta straight away (goes on for months in the team) after injury against England, second he falls back to Beauden Barrett to cover at fullback against Fiji, then he drops Narawa the obvious choice to have started, then he brings in Jordan too soon. That Barret selection (and to a lesser extent Bell's) set the tone for the year.


Then he didn't get the side up for Argentina. They were blown away and didn't look like they expected a fight and were well beaten despite the scoreline in my opinion. Worst performance of the year in the forth game and..


Basically the same problems were persistent, or even exaggerated, after that with the players he did select not given much of an opportunity, with this year having the most number of unused subs I can remember since the amateur days.


What I think I started to realise early on was that he didn't back himself and his team. I think he prepared the players well, don't get me wrong, but I'll credit him with making a conscious choice in tempering his ambition and instead choosing cohesion and to respect (the idea of it being important in himself and his players) experience first and foremost (after two tight games and that 4th game loss). I think he chose wrong in deciding not to be, and back, himself. Hard criticism.


And it played out by preferring Beauden to Dmac on the EOYT (though that may have been a planned move).


I hope I'm right, because going through all the little things of the season and coming up with these bullets, I've got to wonder when I say his last fault is one we have seen at the Crusaders, playing his best players into the ground. What I'm really scared of now is that not wanting a bit of freshness in this last game could be linked with all these other crosses that I want to put down to simple confidence issues. But are they really a sign that he just lacks vision?


Now, that's not to say I haven't seen a lot of positives as well, I just think that for the ABs to go where they want to go he has to fix these crosses. Just have difficult that will be is the question.

24 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame' 'Steve Borthwick hung his troops out to dry - he should take some blame'
Search