Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We just don't want to see these red cards': Clive Woodward weighs in on Steward's red

Freddie Steward of England leaves the field after receiving a red card from Referee Jaco Peyper ( not pictured ) during the Six Nations Rugby match between Ireland and England at Aviva Stadium on March 18, 2023 in Dublin, Ireland. (Photo by Dan Mullan - RFU/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Sir Clive Woodward has been left impressed with England’s turnaround after being left ‘in shock’ last week and has offered his take on the red card issued to English fullback Freddie Steward.

ADVERTISEMENT

The former England coach said there were no doubts about Ireland as the championship’s best team after their 29-16 win to secure a Grand Slam, but was swelling with pride over England’s resurgent effort despite being down to 14 men for the second half.

He credited Owen Farrell, who replaced Marcus Smith in the starting side after last week’s record loss to France, with guiding the team and bringing some on-field leadership to provide some grit.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

“The best team won today and the best team won the championship, so huge congratulations to Ireland and especially to Johnny Sexton,” Woodward said on ITV’s post-game panel show.

“It is a big year for them to nail that, which was fantastic.

“I’ve got to say this time last week I was in shock, but this time today I am very proud of that England team, they really put it to the Irish team. Farrell especially, really impressed me.

“Owen Farrell took the team back to where we know what we can actually do.

“You can win games, you can lose games, but that was a big performance from him today.”

England silenced a raucous Dublin crow with an early 6-0 lead as Ireland showed jitters in the early stages, taking a while to calm the nerves and get into the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

After a Sexton penalty goal, a set-piece try to hooker Dan Sheehan ignited the home crowd as Ireland took back the lead at 10-6.

However the game’s biggest turning point occurred right on half-time as Freddie Steward clattered into his Irish opposite number Hugo Keenan trying to shield himself from the collision.

Both players were chasing a bouncing ball from an Ireland kick but Keenan won the race.

Steward’s challenge was deemed reckless with no mitigating factors, resulting in a red card that drastically tipped the match in Ireland’s favour despite a strong showing from the visitors.

Woodward said the call by Jaco Peyper was not clear cut, but stopped short of claiming it changed the end result of the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They lost two players, the red card was arguable, the yellow card again was arguable,” he said referring also to Jack Willis’ 75th minute sin bin.

“I think it was a tough call but did it change the game, no not really to be honest.

“England were always going to be competitive but I don’t think it would have changed the result.”

The 2003 World Cup-winning coach also had a wider take on the games rules, claiming that red cards shouldn’t be used when there is any doubt lingering about the severity of the sanction. Particularly in big games with the Rugby World Cup approaching.

“When you come to these big knock-out games, we just don’t want to see these red cards unless it’s a clear, “get him off”, but anyway well done to Ireland and to England as well.

Former England flyhalf Jonny Wilkinson said that despite the red card we saw a performance from England that can be the starting block of a quick rebuild under new head coach Steve Borthwick.

“There is so much more to the guys out there, you saw they look more like themselves,” Wilkinson told the ITV panel.

“Contact area they were strong, defensively they were strong, and even with 14 men they didn’t go away.

“When you’ve got 14 men, everyone has got to share they extra man to work and things like ill discipline here and there can really hurt.

“The guy are going to tire out and then at the end there Ireland played it beautifully coming back down that shortside where England were left with big heavy forwards against some fast backs.

“I think for me, the takeaway from that game is there have been some open conversations this week, some honesty, some really deep honesty and that may have relieved a little bit.

“As those shackles have come off, more of the players are coming out. Why not? If they can build on that, you can something really special come quickly.

“You can go from being 50 points down against France to being right there with the best in the tournament.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

England XV v France XV | Full Match Replay

South Africa v British & Irish Lions | 1997 | Second Test | The Vaults

"The Opportunity Of A Lifetime" | Wallabies All In: Episode 1

Are these the best ever Lions performances?

Pollock Loses Bill, Players Meet Their Roommates & Training in Portugal | Ep 1: The Ultimate Test

Top 10 inspiring Lions speeches

United States of Rugby | Episode 1 – Welcome to Dawgtown

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

3 Comments
F
Flankly 829 days ago

Nice to see a thoughtful and more or less balanced commentary from SCW.

J
JP 830 days ago

I am fully supportive of the regulations in rugby to reduce head injuries. However I don’t think the officiating is right yet. Never underestimate the competitiveness of professional players. We now frequently see attacking players targeting head collisions with say a defender’s shoulder or even head. The defender is red carded. I think we should keep the laws as they are but include some additional mitigation. If an attacker recklessly goes head first into a tackle then that is mitigation. If an attacker targets the head of the defender, then the attacker should be red-carded. That way we will much reduce head injuries by removing any incentive for the attacking player to either put themselves at risk, or to risk others.

F
Fabien 829 days ago

Good point

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 27 minutes ago
Three burning Springbok questions Rassie Erasmus must answer in 2025

No doubt SA’s results last year indicated that they were doing many things right, I’m just not sure that developing a new generation of players as capable as the previous one is one of those things. And I don’t think that is Rassie’s fault. I think the old guard have continued playing so well for so long that its hard to drop them, and that there aren’t very many young players really putting their hands up for consideration (before you or anyone else starts listing young SA players - consider that literally any other test team could produce a longer list).


I assume the loose forward trio for the ABs will be Finau, Savea, and Sititi. I have no idea who the trio will be for SA. Obviously PSDT picks himself, but I feel Kolisi is now in the team for his leadership only, rather than his ability round the park, so he could lose his spot to Kwagga or van Staden. Wiese is probably the most likely no.8, but again - could be displaced by Kwagga.


The boks in 2023 showed you can win a world cup without a settled 10. They made it to the SF with Libbok - a man who had less than 10 caps at the start of the tournament, then switched to Pollard, a much more experienced player, but someone who had only started one test in the previous 12 months. The triumvirate of SFM, Libbok, and Pollard is looking pretty good, but in terms of experience they are far outstripped by thee combination of McKenzie, Barrett, & Mo’unga. Of course there are questions about whether the AB flyhalves will still be in form come 2027, but that question could be asked of SA’s players in almost every single position apart from flyhalf.


Maybe Rassie does know exactly who his first, second, third etc. choice players are in each position, but he doesn’t know who they will be in 2027. It is possible that Mbonambi, Mostert, Kolisi, Etzebeth, de Allende, Kolbe, Mapimpi, etc. will still be test standard in 2 years time, but its very likely that many of them won’t be. If they are not available, then I think one issue will be simply that the next gen are not quite as good. Nortjé and Moerat both look like great talents, but does anyone really think they will be as good as Mostert & Etzebeth? Will Wessells and Grobbelaar come close to Mbonambi & Marx? Will Fassi ever hit the heights of le Roux?


Maybe your answer to some of these questions is “yes” - but that brings us on to the bigger issue, which is that retaining so many older players works against younger players gaining experience. Wallace Sititi, for example, will almost certainly go to the next world cup with something like 30 or 40 caps. If he was a south african, he would be stuck behind PSDT, Kwagga, Wiese, etc., and probably gain half that number. On the one hand, that does just demonstrate that in many positions SA have better players than NZ do, but on the other hand it means that in 2027 and possibly 2031, SA will have less experience to draw on. Eben Etzebeth was 24 when he won his 50th cap for the Boks. Le Roux was 29. Kolisi & Marx were 28. Pollard was 27. Currently the youngest Bok with 50 caps will turn 31 in 2 weeks. Only one player aged 26 and under has more than 10 caps. I think that should be concerning, given how much SA have relied upon experience in the past few years!

50 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Three burning Springbok questions Rassie Erasmus must answer in 2025 Three burning Springbok questions Rassie Erasmus must answer in 2025
Search