Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

We should prepare ourselves for more diving in rugby

Referee Jaco Peyper speaks with England's Owen Farrell in March when he last refereed in Dublin (Photo By Harry Murphy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Around 20 years ago two Warwickshire club sides were about an hour into an uneventful match.

The visitors won a defensive scrum about ten metres from their own line and with plenty of time their scrum half passed to his full back who waited deep in the in-goal area.

ADVERTISEMENT

The visiting no.15 duly cleared his lines and found a good touch – then a split second later as the home flanker who had got nowhere near making a charge-down passed about a metre to his left he threw himself theatrically to the ground and screamed loudly.

The flanker was momentarily frozen to the spot, then realisation hit him.

“What the **** are you doing?” he berated his prone opponent.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

All the other players quickly turned to look then one by one everyone – including the full back’s teammates – began to laugh. He duly went a deep shade of red, clambered up, muttered an apology and the game continued.

A couple of hours later we were all a few pints under when the home side’s flanker approached the referee in the bar.

“Did you think about giving him a yellow card for diving ref,” he asked. I had to confess like everyone else I had been too busy laughing to even consider it.

I was reminded of this almost-forgotten incident this weekend when watching first France’s Damian Penaud then Ireland’s Grand Slam winning captain Johnny Sexton milk similar incidents for all they were worth.

ADVERTISEMENT

Penaud stayed on the Stade de France turf for a good 90 seconds after being shoved out of the way by an off-balance opponent before eventually realising that referee Nic Berry was not remotely interested in how he got there.

France <a href=
Japan match report” width=”1920″ height=”1080″ /> (Photo by Lionel Bonaventure/AFP via Getty Images)

And in Dublin Sexton feigned a head injury after being shoved in the back by England no.8 Alex Dombrandt. Alive to what was afoot, England skipper Owen Farrell then suggested to referee Jaco Peyper that since his opposite number thought he’d sustained a head injury he also should leave the pitch for an HIA. Unsurprisingly this brought the whole sorry episode to an abrupt end.

I have never been very comfortable with the ingrained snobbery with which many rugby fans look down upon their football counterparts. This whole ‘we know how to behave in rugby’ thing along with the ‘thugs game played by gentlemen’ line has always to me overlooked huge historic and cultural differences which exist between the two sports – certainly in England and I suspect also elsewhere in the world.

ADVERTISEMENT

But despite this few would dispute that the pre-1995 amateur version of rugby union in this respect had some marked differences to its round-ball counterpart or that in leaning heavily on the so-called ‘spirit of rugby’ and ‘rugby values’ our sport’s governing bodies have tried to cling on to that essence in the professional age.

But in the same way that calling the referee ‘sir’ and accepting without question his law book defined status as the sole judge of fact and law has gradually become a relic of the past, does the arrival of diving/simulation represent the removal of another layer of rugby’s traditional values?

Speaking to host Jim Hamilton on his podcast ‘The Big Jim Show,’ Saracens’ England no.8 Billy Vunipola described what happened next after he took a blow to the head in the Premiership final against Leicester.

He said: “I stayed down too long because I thought ‘we’re going to get a yellow card here so let’s have a rest.’

“I remember our doctor Laura holding my head and I was saying: ‘Get off me Laura I’m fine I’m just trying to milk a penalty’ and the next thing I knew I was in the medical room with the independent doctor which was my own fault.”

Every action generates a reaction and the knock-on effect of this approach was evident during this season’s Six Nations meeting between France and Scotland.

Noting that the home side had sent on a doctor to examine the injured Anthony Jelonch, referee Nika Amashukeli clearly suspected that the hosts were without good cause trying to delay the game for long enough that the TMO would examine the hit which caused the injury.

His curt instruction to the medic was therefore: “Tell me it’s a HIA and leave the pitch with the player or leave the pitch immediately.”

As events transpired France’s bench clearly knew what had gone on better than the referee and one review later Scotland lock Grant Gilchrist was heading for an early bath.

Having yesterday seen clips of England’s Lewis Ludlam being the victim of a head contact as an Irish player flew into a maul during Saturday’s contest in Dublin, it is hard not to wonder what would have happened had the arrival of a doctor again triggered a pause.

Related

At the root of all this is the introduction of first red and yellow cards in the late 1990’s then the arrival of the TMO and citing commissioner.

I recall as a teenager avidly reading all the Sunday newspaper coverage of Wales flanker Paul Ringer’s sending off during England’s 1980 Grand Slam season following a very late and high tackle on John Horton.

In those days a sending off was the rarest of commodities but as we saw with the resigned reaction to Freddie Steward’s dismissal at the Aviva Stadium, following the introduction of safety-based changes they are now commonplace.

With it being so much easier to get a red card – even for an unintentional act – unfortunately it is inevitable in the dog-eat-dog world of professional sport that players and coaches will seek to take the opportunity to reduce their opponents’ numbers whenever an opportunity presents itself. After all, how often does a team that plays with 14 players for a prolonged period manage to win?

At the risk of turning this column into a trip down memory lane, I recall watching football on TV in the 1980’s and when being asked to comment on a British player staying down following a foul, pundits would often say: “One professional would never try to get another sent off.”

While this rule of thumb didn’t apply elsewhere in the world, when we occasionally saw an Italian or Spanish side in the European Cup we would all enjoy the ridicule heaped upon their theatrics.

Forty years later, diving is now such an accepted part of football in every corner of the globe that a yellow card may be shown for simulation. Might rugby union be heading in the same direction?

An alternative angle on this is that only the presence of the TMO puts rugby in this position. I have covered around a dozen games this season in the English Championship and National One at Coventry and Birmingham Moseley and struggle to recall any penalties being awarded for dangerous play relating to head contact while the only diving done is from the bar at the end of a long evening.

Does this therefore add further fuel to those who believe we need separate versions of the law book for the professional game and the rest of us?

Food for thought…

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
D
David 593 days ago

A few years ago, watching a Scotland international, Stuart Hogg collected a long kick from the opposition and then played the customary return kick. As a did, an opponent was closing in to try and charge it down but was nowhere near close enough to reach it, or Hogg, However, as the opponent trotted past him (but nowhere near making contact) Hogg decided to throw himself to the ground and hold his leg. By the this time, the ref, Nigel Owens had made it the vicinity and simply ran past, turned to Hogg and simply said, "I saw what you did and don't like it, don't do it again"

z
zane 594 days ago

If the game of rugby continues to go the way of football, it will have to prepare itself to see it's fans fall out of love with the game of rugby. I can't watch football because of the theatrics of diving to win a foul, I won't watch rugby for the same reasons. I'll use my RWC 2023 tickets as I bought them a long time ago but, I am falling out of love with the game.

S
Simon 594 days ago

Sexton has been doing this for several years now and refs buy it all the time because it's Sexton. Farrell was brilliant on Saturday because when Sexton has feigned these head knocks to get penalties and yellow cards (Liam Williams this year), he has never been taken off for a HIA! If Williams' challenge was deemed worthy of a yellow card, that means definite head contact and a degree of danger, yet Sexton stayed on. Ireland have perfected the dive in recent years, especially with the addition of Lowe and Hansen, who, not being Irish or from the Northern Hemisphere, have brought their style of rugby and it is not welcome!!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Mick Cleary: 'Borthwick needs to have faith in Marcus Smith' Mick Cleary: 'Borthwick needs to have faith in Marcus Smith'
Search