'We think we've given them ample time to prepare for the tests': RA bitterly disappointed at Springboks' withdrawal

So you'd have the top 8 in the URC, top 7 in Top 14, and top 5 of the Premiership.

This really seems like a pretty obvious no brainer. There are three top flight leagues across Europe/Africa, with 40 clubs total. The numbers are all very obvious. I think the biggest reason this isn't done is because it leaves with a choice of eliminating a knockout round, or, letting so many from the pool stage through, it makes the pool stage almost meaningless.

That said, I think this still makes sense. You know players are going to be happy with one less round of fixtures. Also allows the Top 14 one less week when they have to overlap with international rugby too.

Work it out per head in a 35 man squad.

Premiership footballers earning €200k a week won't generate that sort of income for their national team.

You've missed that English clubs compete in a two tier euro league in addition to an Anglo-welsh cup.

SR is now just groups of Pacific islanders running into each other.

There's subjective opinions and then there's pure ignorance.

Seriously.

Well if it was bad coaching, and it lead to two world cups and now a RC, and two years of >85% win ratio on the trot - I’d love to see how he’d have down with better coaching.

It's means you've thought from the top down, and I'd have a bottom up approach. So I think first about what is best for the teams at the bottom, instead of your above approach were you try to fit teams in at the top first.

You've miss understood. You have to set up the competition so that it is based on merit, not like what you've done b,y last years results of English performance as a 'snapshot' of what the future will be like; ie you've given all leagues equal numbers/representation, that is the wrong approach imo. The share should be performance based, and with far less random WC's.

Well that's where we'll have to disagree then, because imo it's a much better idea to give the leagues WC spots rather than the individual teams. I suppose it depends a lot on stability, for instance the 4 Challenge Cup teams you name Sharks and Benneton are in contention because they are at least earning it based on one years of results (this year, so far at least, and last years results, respectively), Clermont a little less so, but Gloucester should not be included based on last year if it's supposed to be a true elite competition and compete with Super Rugby.

Same goes with Exeter, they should not be their because they were part of the 2024 version. Are Gloucester doing well in the prem this year because theyre not worried about resting players for Champions Cup competition? Teams like Benneton get the WC spot for Sharks winning a european trophy, Connacht (I'm not sure I buy my example of giving URC more to start with so maybe this is like Irelands 2nd or 3rd best team in future occasions) as Irelands wildcard for winning the 6N, Castres are rewarded for the Top 14 providing last years champions, based on my example WC ideas. Stormers are included based on the bigger base URC gets, and La Rochelle (based on league) or Toulon (as the missed the top four by elimination game).

Some good English teams miss out but as I say you don't want to be chopping and changing the formats so it might work out in future or you simply start with 5 each and Bristol is is included in CC. Why would you want to give less consistent teams, ones that primarly do well in europe, preference?