Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We want to put shots in': England set to fight Samoan fire with fire

(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Richard Wigglesworth has explained that England will to fight fire with fire and won’t shy away from the physicality battle that is brewing versus Samoa on Saturday in Lille.

ADVERTISEMENT

With a quarter-final on the horizon in Marseille on October 15, there might be a temptation for the already qualified English to sit back and let their final Pool D game unfold without fighting fully in the collisions.

However, assistant coach Wigglesworth has explained that England won’t shy away from confrontation despite the run that saw them suffer three red cards in four matches, including the dismissal of Tom Curry less than three minutes into the Rugby World Cup opener versus Argentina on September 9.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

The back-rower is now free from suspension and set to play for the first time in four weeks against a Samoan side reeling from their own card troubles which resulted in a red for Ben Lam in last Thursday’s 28-22 defeat to Japan in Toulouse.

“If you ask Kev Sinfield and you have seen how we train, we want to put shots in,” suggested Wigglesworth. “There isn’t a ‘Let’s take it on the chin and let that happen’.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
3
1
Streak
1
19
Tries Scored
16
22
Points Difference
-13
3/5
First Try
2/5
4/5
First Points
2/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
3/5

“Anything I have seen from them, the Ben Lam (tackle) was as we have had where you are like you have just got it slightly wrong. There is no I didn’t watch him and think they are going high. They are trying to make big physical tackles as will we.”

Due to their card troubles leading into the tournament, England were branded as an undisciplined side but aside from the Curry red card, they have been squeaky clean at the finals.

ADVERTISEMENT

Just seven penalties were conceded against Argentina, six versus Japan and just two were given up in the first half against Chile before they lost focus in the second period and nine penalties were conceded.

The ambition now is to get back on track versus Samoa. “It’s something we try to make really important. We had the incidents that we had, no one really believed us when we said that we take discipline really important in this environment but we do.

“We know that it is key to your team winning games so we make it incredibly important, we try and train it that way and review it that way. This weekend it will be no different.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
P
Poe 444 days ago

Expect cards...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 56 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search