Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We won with him and we lost with him and we crack on': Old conundrum facing the McKenzie-less Chiefs

(Photo by Peter Meecham/Getty Images)

Heading into the 2021 season, the key battle amongst the Chiefs ranks appeared to be who would be entrusted with the No 10 jersey: Kaleb Trask or Bryn Gatland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trask shared the duties with former All Black Aaron Cruden in 2020 and took over as the starting first five-eighth once any hopes of a Super Rugby Aotearoa championship were dashed, seemingly in preparation for the years ahead.

Curiously, while Trask and Gatland were both given ample opportunities at No 10 this year, it’s been Damian McKenzie who’s seemingly emerged as the first-choice candidate.

Video Spacer

The panel of Ross Karl, James Parsons and Bryn Hall talk about all the action and news from the week of rugby in New Zealand and across the world.

Video Spacer

The panel of Ross Karl, James Parsons and Bryn Hall talk about all the action and news from the week of rugby in New Zealand and across the world.

Gatland has had the most starts at first five, playing five matches, while Trask has started in that role on three occasions. McKenzie’s taken on the playmaking duties in the last three encounters, however, and was likely to stay in the role, were it not for the three-week suspension handed out due to a high tackle made on Tate McDermott in the Chiefs’ loss to the Reds over the weekend.

Speaking to media on Tuesday, Chiefs assistant coach David Hill confirmed that McKenzie would be heading home to Hamilton while the rest of the team relocates from Queensland to Sydney in preparation for their match with the Rebels.

“He’s obviously pretty gutted with what went down but we made it pretty clear to him and the team made it pretty clear to him that he wasn’t allowed to say sorry or anything like that,” Hill said. “We won with him and we lost with him and we crack on.

“He was pretty upset after the game. He’s slowly coming round. We’re a pretty tight group, like to give each other a little bit of stick. He’s probably got to fill water bottles and do some laundry to make it up to us for the next day or two, until we kick him out and get rid of him.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was obviously a disappointing red card during the game and when it comes to judiciary stuff, it’s very much out of our hands and just have to cop what they deem is the appropriate punishment and crack on.”

With McKenzie unavailable, it’s again time for the Chiefs coaches to elect a new No 10, with Trask and Gatland the obvious options.

Trask switched mirrored McKenzie’s usual in-game shift on Saturday evening, switching from fullback to first five once the starting No 10 had been sent from the field, and is probably a more like-for-like replacement for the All Black.

Gatland, however, is perhaps a cooler pair of hands but Hill and his fellow coaches have the utmost trust in both players.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’ve got some great options there and very confident, have trust and faith in the whole squad to do a job,” said Hill. “We’ll just crack on and find the best combination for the next couple of games.

“Bryn started the [Super Rugby Aotearoa] final for us, Trasky started three in a row when we won three in a row. Really comfortable with either of those options. The Blues game, we started Bryn at 10 and Kaleb at 15 and … we’ve got [fullback] Chase [Tiatia] and even Shaun Stevenson. We’ve got some good options there.

“For this week, we’ll mix and match a little bit but we’re pretty flexible around what the team needs and how we want to play the game as to who starts there but as you’ve seen with Damo moving around, we’ve got the ability to start one at 15 and potentially move them and do a bit of that.”

The Chiefs are set to play the Rebels in Hamilton on Sunday but if the travel corridor between Victoria and New Zealand is not green-lit, the game will instead be played at Sydney’s Leichhardt Oval.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search