Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Weaponised Japan scrum on revenge mission after previous Bok humbling

Keita Inagaki has been one of the most consistent loosehead props in world rugby over the last four years. (Photo by Ken Ishii/Getty Images)

For the second Rugby World Cup in the row, Japan are boasting one of, if not the most efficient and influential scrum at the tournament, despite regularly giving up sizeable weight advantages to their opponents.

ADVERTISEMENT

In England in 2015, it was Eddie Jones and Marc dal Maso’s swift set-piece that prioritised quick ball and would hook down channel one, with the No 8 shifting over to be between the flanker and feed-side lock, that set the Rugby World Cup alight. It was a vital component behind Japan’s now famous victory over South Africa and loosehead prop Keita Inagaki and hooker Shota Horie were both excellent proponents of it.

Four years later and Japan are once again preparing to play the Springboks, albeit this time under the tutelage of Jamie Joseph and former international front row Shin Hasegawa.

Whilst the challenge will be a considerable one once again for the Japanese pack, it’s not one that they should be shying away from, having taken on and triumphed against the Irish and Scottish forwards in recent weeks, despite having faced their fair share of struggles against South Africa in the Rugby World Cup warm-up game.

“That showed what happens when we don’t do what we’re intent on,” said Hasegawa.

Video Spacer

“We’ve played four games since but there has never been a game we’ve been satisfied with our scrums throughout the 80 minutes. We need to have scrums that don’t give them a gap to exploit.

“I thought what was important was how many messages I can get across to the players, but Jamie [Joseph] said I was being too perfect. He said, let them do more by themselves, which will ingrain autonomy among them.

“He doesn’t actually say anything about the scrum in training. Now the players can adjust themselves during games. Sometimes I send a message across but they are already talking about it, so we’re heading in the right direction.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Just as they did under dal Maso four years ago, however, the Japan scrum will not be coming into the game without an idea of how to disrupt and counter the much heavier Springbok pack.

“Details. We have all the patterns to deal with different situations and the players understand them. We’ll get stronger,” concluded Hasegawa.

Japan and Hasegawa have previously prepared for heavier packs by their starting eight practising against 10-man scrums, something which captain Michael Leitch heralded following Japan’s win over Ireland earlier in the pool stages. The starting tight five in that eight will largely pick itself heading into the contest with South Africa.

Inagaki, one of the heroes of Brighton, has been ever-present in Japan’s starting front row at the tournament, bringing technical proficiency to each of the four pool games. He has been spelled by the distinctive shock of blonde hair of Isileli Nakajima who, although he doesn’t bring the same prowess at the set-piece, offers an enviable physical presence as a ball-carrier. Given Nakajima only recently made the transition to the front row, that shouldn’t come as much of a surprise.

ADVERTISEMENT

Horie was given a brief rest against Samoa, though the 33-year-old hooker has started the other three games of Japan’s Rugby World Cup so far and he will almost certainly be front and centre when Joseph announces his team to play South Africa. A lot can change in four years and the Springboks are certainly a different proposition to the one that showed up in Brighton in 2015, but the combination and effectiveness of Inagaki and Horie is unchanged and as formidable as ever.

Where the Japan scrum will face some uncertainty is on the tighthead, with Jiwon Koo, who started the crunch games against Ireland, Scotland and Samoa, leaving the field on Sunday with what looked like a rib injury. Should he be unavailable as expected, that will open the door for Asaeli Ai Valu, with the Panasonic Wild Knight set to join his club teammates Inagaki and Horie in the front row.

In the second row, James Moore, another ever-present so far for Japan, will likely pack down alongside one of Luke Thompson or Wimpie van der Walt. In the games against Ireland and Scotland, Thompson was the man chosen to partner Moore and the 38-year-old has rolled back the years so far at the tournament. They may not provide the most ballast of any second rows in international rugby, although the Japan scrum has not been hurt as a result.

Once again, the Brave Blossoms will look to avoid engaging in a physical arm wrestle with the South Africans, in what would be a move that would play into all the strengths of Rassie Erasmus’ squad. Some of the personnel may have changed since that famous night in Brighton, but the game plan won’t have. As it has throughout this tournament for Japan, it will be all about pace, tempo and an eagerness to move their opponents around.

From a scrum perspective, Hasegawa is likely preparing his charges to get the ball in and out as quickly as possible, not only to negate South Africa’s brute strength upfront, but also to unleash the threats of Kenki Fukuoka and Kotaro Matsushima out wide, a tactic that not only saw off the Boks in Brighton, but also Ireland in Shizuoka much more recently.

Watch: Fans are divided over where Japan’s future should reside in international rugby

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search