Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Weekend of milestones for Brumbies

Brumbies head coach Dan McKellar has made three changes to his side that will take on the Reds in their week eight Super Rugby clash.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matt Lucas, Chance Peni and Tom Banks have all been given the starting nod in place of Joe Powell, Lausii Taliauli and Andrew Muirhead respectively.

Peni returns to the left-wing after missing the last two games, while Tom Banks is in at fullback.

Lucas gets his first start of the season in the No. 9 jersey.

Co-captain Sam Carter returns to the side as one of three new faces among the reserves.

Carter was deemed fit after a prolonged absence thanks to a head knock suffered against the Rebels back in week four.

Leslie Leuluaialii-Makin returns as front row cover. He replaces Mees Erasmus who was named on the bench last week but failed to claim his first Brumbies cap.

Erasmus’ former Force teammate James Verity-Amm is in line to make his Brumbies debut, named as backs cover.

ADVERTISEMENT

The weekend will see Wallaby winger Henry Speight bring up his 100th cap for the club, while forwards Rory Arnold and Allan Alaalatoa will reach the fifty-cap milestone.

BRUMBIES

1. Scott Sio, 2. Folau Fainga’a, 3. Alan Alaalatoa, 4. Rory Arnold, 5. Blake Enever, 6. Lachlan McCaffrey, 7. David Pocock, 8. Isi Naisarani, 9. Ben Lucas, 10. Wharenui Hawera, 11. Chance Peni, 12. Christian Lealiifano, 13. Tevita Kuridrani, 14. Henry Speight, 15. Tom Banks.
Reserves: 16. Robbie Abel, 17. Faalelei Sione, 18. Leslie Leulaialii-Makin, 19. Sam Carter, 20. Tom Cusack, 21. Joe Powell, 22. Kyle Godwin, 23. James Verity-Amm.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner David Campese names his Springbok world player of the year winner
Search