Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Welsh captain reveals Hammett's iron-fist warning to Cardiff players 'I got rid of Andrew Hore and Ma'a Nonu'

Coach Mark Hammett of the Hurricanes looks on. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Former Wales captain and hooker Matthew Rees has opened up about the ill-fated appointment of ex-Hurricanes coach Mark Hammett at the Cardiff Blues in his new book, Matthew Rees: Reasons2Smile.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hammett joined the Blues on a three-year deal in 2014 but lasted just six months before resigning.

Rees details his first interaction with the former All Black and Crusader shortly after his arrival, which started the relationship on the wrong foot. Hammett wanted to take an iron-fist approach to turn the Blues around, which caused strained relationships with senior players.

“The first time I met him was when I went to the Hilton Hotel in Cardiff with Richard Holland, the chief executive at Cardiff Blues, who had arranged a meeting with him and Warren Gatland. He proceeded to talk to us about his own ethos regarding the game, his plans for the Cardiff Blues and how he wanted us to play,” he wrote.

“After the initial pleasantries had been exchanged, Hammett asked me bluntly: ‘How close are you to Gethin Jenkins – are you mates?’

“I replied by saying I’d known Melon since junior rugby and we were good friends. What he said next, I couldn’t believe – he asked me if I felt that Melon needed to change as a character.

“I was stunned: a man who’d been on three Lions tours, played for his country for many years and captained them many times, and was so highly thought of by his peers, and I was being asked if he needed to change.”

After telling Hammett he didn’t need to change, he allegedly replied with: “Bear in mind, I got rid of Andrew Hore and Ma’a Nonu at the Hurricanes,” firing a warning shot to Rees that he will do whatever he thinks necessary.

“The message I took from that was that it was going to be his way and no compromises, no matter what your status in the game,” Rees wrote.

“Hammett should have been interacting with influential senior players, explaining what he wanted and building up a leadership group to aid him, not alienating them.”

Hammett faced a player-led revolt shortly into his tenure, and Rees and Jenkins meet with him to talk through the team’s issues.

“Melon and I did have a meeting with Hammett, but when we advised him that the players were not happy, his initial response was that if players were not happy, they could leave.

“I remember asking him: ‘What, every one of the players can leave?’.”

Hammett’s plans for a Blues revival included strenuous workloads on the players, that were unproven for the length of the Northern Hemisphere season which lead to the problems.

He admitted to Stuff.co.nz in response to Rees claims that he “probably tried to move things too quickly” and that he took learnings from the experience.

“In hindsight, I think I probably tried to move things ahead too quickly, with regards to player workloads and gameplans/techniques, without understanding the nature of the northern hemisphere competition and the culture of the club.

“This was a big learning I took out of my time there and have taken those learnings into all my future coaching roles since.”

After leaving Cardiff, Hammett returned to New Zealand but then took up the head coaching role with the newly formed Sunwolves. After one season, Hammett returned again to New Zealand to take up assistant roles with Tasman and the Highlanders.

In other news:

Video Spacer

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search