Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We've been quite ruthless': The science behind the hectic Worcester recruitment drive amid huge exodus of 20 players

Jonathan Thomas (Photo by Luke Walker/Getty Images)

It’s a good thing that ex-Wales international Jonathan Thomas has got a bit of charisma about how he presents himself and an ambitious, well-articulated vision of a brighter future at Worcester, otherwise life would currently be hell 17 weeks into his first-ever job as a head coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

Twelve defeats have been the 38-year-old’s lot since he stepped up to the plate having initially joined the club last summer as forwards coach (the only W is from a February game cancelled due to Covid). Some reverses have been agonisingly close. The one-point loss to Gallagher Premiership leaders Bristol, a four-point gap versus champions Exeter and just three points separated them from semi-final chasing Sale.

But other setbacks have laid bare the cavernous scale of the mammoth task Thomas has taken on. You can perhaps excuse 24- and 25-point losses as merely bad days at the office, or even this weekend’s second-half fade-out at Chiefs where a 10-8 interval lead became a 10-41 surrender. But there can be no hiding place when your team ships 62 points and gets hammered at home by an embarrassing 48 points – as the Warriors did against Northampton on March 27.

Video Spacer

The crazy reaction on the RugbyPass Fanzone to the 2021 Lions squad announcement

Video Spacer

The crazy reaction on the RugbyPass Fanzone to the 2021 Lions squad announcement

In any other year, it would be panic stations for the ‘Worriers’. Saturday’s latest loss has them firmly anchored to the bottom, 14 points adrift of next-best Newcastle with just four matches remaining this season. However, the pandemic moratorium on relegation means there are no sleepless nights, only industrial style planning to lay the foundation they hope can finally break a legacy of non-achievement.

Worcester’s 15-season Premiership history is perpetual lower-end suffering. There have been two twelfth place relegations, with another on the way this year that is crucially minus the drop, five eleventh place finishes, four tenth places, two ninth places and just the single eighth place, their highest ever in 2005/06.

In all that time there have been just 93 wins from 326 outings. It’s a mere 28.5 per cent win ratio, a figure that bleakly illustrates the size of the task embraced by Thomas, the 67-cap ex-Welsh back-rower, who finished out his club career by playing two seasons for Worcester after exiting the Ospreys, the relegation campaign of 2013/14 followed by the successful next year in the Championship.

Those second-tier smiles are a world away, though, from upward mobility in the Premiership, but a grandiose plan has been hatched to shake things up like never before at Sixways and a revolving door is in full swing to try and ensure these improved results materialise in the years ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was in the wake of the March hammering by the Saints that Thomas – who gave up the cushion of a two-year assistant’s contract extension at Bristol to instead pitch up Worcester ten months ago – gave a fleeting glimpse of the immense level juggling that is going on.

There are 20 players leaving the club at the end of the season, so there is a lot going on behind the scenes,” he said six weeks ago and Thomas has now given RugbyPass a proper insight into his thinking behind all the Worcester comings and goings, a heavy influx and exodus that would leave the head of a lesser organised coach spinning with the gigantic rate of change.

The upside of having so many players going off-contract is that Thomas doesn’t have to hang around making do with the squad he inherited from Alan Solomons, the director of rugby who left the coaching to the Welshman in early January.

Worcester next season will be very much a team moulded by Thomas, but what actually is the science of the recruitment drive he has embarked on, a flurry of high-end signings (internationals Duhan van der Merwe, Chris Ashton, Willi Heinz, Scott Baldwin, Owen Williams and Sione Vailanu) married with a plethora of mid-tier names (the likes of Christian Judge, Will Chudley, Jack Owlett, Kyle Hatherell and Harri Doel)?

ADVERTISEMENT

“It has been a challenging process because of the salary cap being reduced and because I have come into a position (as head coach) halfway through the season in January,” he said to RugbyPass. “But it is all about your process and I have worked closely with Solly [Solomons] on that – what is our identity, what identity do we want in two, three years’ time when we want to be the team we want to be?

“What does that look like in terms of style of play, and then once you work out what your vision and your identity are you can then go right, who are the people and the players that we need to recruit to fulfil that vision that we want?

“We have been quite ruthless in the process. It’s never ideal to have that volume of players off-contract at one time and leaving, 20 players or whatever it is, so that has certainly been really tough, some tough conversations especially when I have got a huge amount of respect and care a lot about the players that are leaving… but we have done really well. 

“We have got a couple more players that we would like to bring in but when you look at the whole thing we are pretty pleased with recruitment, with what we have got coming in next year. I’m really excited about the squad we will have. It will be a smaller squad than this year but we don’t mind going with a smaller squad because we have got some good, young homegrown players coming through. 

“Part of our vision is to bring through our academy players so if you want to be true to that vision, if you get opportunities to play them you have to have the balls to play them. Having a smaller squad, probably having quality over quantity, is what suits us with where we are at as a squad at the moment.”

But what about the mechanics in Worcester chasing a particular player, who does the heavy lifting with Thomas? “Solly and I work closely together on that. I’m in charge of the rugby programme so myself, together with the other coaches and Solly, will identify what is our identity and who do we want to recruit to that identity.

“We would earmark certain players that we would want to bring in and in terms of who deals with the negotiations, that would be Solly. Solly does the dealings with the agents because my position as head coach is to focus on the performance of the team and the coaching Monday to Saturday, but we will go through that process. Myself and Solly will sit down and we will say right these are the players we want to target and then Solly goes and does the negotiations as the DoR.”

What is the Worcester identity, though, and what is the common denominator in the signings they have secured? “First and foremost we play on a 4G. You have to be cognizant of the fact that every team that plays on a 4G goes wow that was a fast game so you have to recruit players that are fast, who have the ability to play a fast game.

“There is no point bringing in players that can’t because then you are not being true to your identity. We are a team that if we play on a 4G we want to have the ability to play a fast game, we want to be a team that takes the space a defence gives us. 

“What does that mean? If we need to attack and need to go through phase play then we can do that, we need a good kicking game and we need to have connected width on our attack on both sides, a two-sided attack so it gives us the ability to get the ball to edges.

“We want to develop our whole game over the next few years but also, first and foremost, I’m a forwards coach and I want to have a powerful forward pack and that is something that is part of our evolution. The reality is you look at La Rochelle last weekend, you look at Leicester, there are some monster packs out there at the moment and the Prem has always been a little like that. 

“So we need to have powerful men who reproduce big efforts. Part of that is your recruitment and your genetics, but also part of that is how you condition them so that is the appointment of David Drake (as head of performance and head of strength and conditioning). 

“We need to be able to play any style of game in any weather conditions on any given day with any give referee on any given surface so we need to be able to adapt, we need to be able to play fast, to have a good skill set, to be able to play any type of game, but we need to be big, to have big powerful men who can repeat effort as well. That summarises where we want to go but that takes time. We are right at the start of the journey in terms of that recruitment process so we are excited with what we have for next year.”

The international standard of some of the signings illustrates how the Warriors are no mugs at the moment in the recruitment market, their financial savvy and ambition to become a top-end Premiership club piquing the interest of X-factor talents whose arrival at Worcester under Thomas has made rival clubs sit up and take notice how they mean business next term.

“It’s really important,” said Thomas about the Warriors bagging some big names. “I guess you can put players into two categories – you have got the soldiers and you have got the artists and you certainly don’t underestimate how important the soldiers are, the guys who pitch up every week, great mindset, really good work ethic, go hard, really physical, do a lot of the unseen work, really important. 

“They are going to be the majority of your squad so it is really important with those guys that you have a really good balance there. They don’t always have to be X-factor. That can sometimes be players that aren’t born with natural talent but they certainly are world-class at things that don’t require talent. 

“But then the reality is you need your artists who can light up games, who can put bums on seats, who can win you games in the moments that matter. The number of games I played with Shane Williams, I wouldn’t like to think the number of games I played with Shane but it is really handy when you are a forward and you’re getting out of the bottom of a ruck and you can see Shane going 40 metres and scoring the winning try of the game.

“That is pretty useful and the number of times that he did that for Ospreys and Wales was ridiculous, so you need those players, the van der Merwe, the Melani Nanai, the Ollie Lawrence. You need those players in your team. The balance is important between the soldiers and the artists and we think we have got a pretty good balance next year.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 6 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

50 Go to comments
f
fl 43 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

50 Go to comments
f
fl 57 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

50 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Generally disagree with what? The possibility that they would get whitewashed, or the idea they shouldn't gain access until they're good enough?


I think the first is a fairly irrelevant view, decide on the second and then worry about the first. Personally I'd have had them in a third lvl comp with all the bottom dwellers of the leagues. I liked the idea of those league clubs resting their best players, and so being able to lift their standards in the league, though, so not against the idea that T2 sides go straight into Challenge Cup, but that will be a higher level with smaller comps and I think a bit too much for them (not having followed any of their games/performances mind you).

Because I don't think that having the possibility of a team finishing outside the quarter finals to qualify automatically will be a good idea. I'd rather have a team finishing 5th in their domestic league.

fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen.


The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime.

50 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

50 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ireland centre Bundee Aki ends speculation with decision over future Ireland centre Bundee Aki ends speculation with decision over future
Search