Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'We've heard nothing from EPCR' - Prem DoR says clubs left in limbo

Newcastle's players stepped in as emergency bar staff (PA)

Newcastle Falcons director of rugby Dean Richards says that clubs have been left facing ‘a hugely uncertain’ fortnight in Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

The EPCR have said that they will push ahead with Rounds 3 and 4 of European competition despite the ongoing travel restrictions, testing requirements and isolation periods necessitated by the French government’s reaction to the Omicron variant.

Falcons have Challenge Cup games scheduled in Biarritz on Friday and Toulon eight days later and Richards has now hit out at the lack of clarity from the governing body over the logistics required to honour the fixtures.

Video Spacer

A Rugby Player’s Christmas and England’s Lewis Ludlam | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 15

Video Spacer

A Rugby Player’s Christmas and England’s Lewis Ludlam | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 15

“It’s not as simple as EPCR just coming out and saying the games are going ahead,” Richards told the club website.  “There’s still a 48-hour isolation period for people entering France, and there’s been no clarity on what that means. Does it mean we’re locked in a hotel room for 48 hours, and you’ve got to take a test before the game to get out of your hotel?

“If anyone tests positive there’ll be a ten-day isolation period, and you’d have to assume that’ll be for virtually the whole squad if they’ve been on a plane and a bus together.

“We’re not sure where we stand with it all, and to be honest I’m not sure if we can go.

“There has so far been no relaxation from the French government regarding the 48-hour isolation requirement, and it’s very much up in the air. We just don’t know where we stand.”

“We’ve heard nothing from EPCR other than a positive email which doesn’t actually clarify anything. There’s no clarity on isolation, no clarity on the testing, and all they’ve said is from the competition point of view it’s game on. But that’s not what the French government have said so far, and we just don’t know where we stand.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The situation is compounded by having back-to-back games out in France, and there’s every chance we’ll go out there and end up living in France for the next three or four weeks. That might not sound bad to some people, but I don’t think they’ll be sending red wine and foie gras to our quarantine hotel room!”

Richards wants to re-schedule rather than cancel the affected matches.

“The Sale game on Boxing Day is a classic case in point,” said Richards. “Whether it was right to cancel the game is irrelevant – there are gaps in the season whereby you could still get these games played.

“There are cup weekends and things like that, and we’d be happy to play midweek to get these games played rather than just cancelling them. Clubs have got big squads, and especially in a season without relegation it’d be great to get some of your younger guys or your squad players to step up to that Gallagher Premiership stage.

“I appreciate there are difficulties involved, but we’ve got loads of guys who want to play rugby, and I don’t think it’s right that we’re just cancelling these games.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There are loads of guys sat in the stand who aren’t getting any rugby, and I just don’t understand why as a league we’re doing what we’re doing. I don’t know how the other clubs feel and I’m only speaking for Newcastle, but we’d be dead keen to re-schedule the games rather than just cancelling them.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

145 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search