Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What Bath make of the transfer system that this weekend sees Zach Mercer come up against his new club Montpellier

(Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Bath boss Stuart Hooper doesn’t believe the transfer market in rugby needs revising despite the awkwardness of seeing his No8 Zach Mercer go into a European Challenge Cup semi-final battle on Saturday night against Montpellier, the French club he announced in February he will play for in 2021/22. 

ADVERTISEMENT

The 23-year-old Mercer would never have imagined this complication arising twelve weeks ago when news of his Top 14 deal was confirmed. 

At the time, the European tournaments were suspended having had their January pool matches cancelled, the all-knockout format restart for the Challenge Cup has resulted in 16 teams being cut down to four and Bath lining up to face Montpellier.

Video Spacer

England pair Shaunagh Brown and Dan Norton guest on the latest RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

England pair Shaunagh Brown and Dan Norton guest on the latest RugbyPass Offload

It’s not an unusual occurrence either. So many summer player transfers in England are announced in the preceding months, often resulted in players playing for the old clubs against the soon-to-be clubs.

The optics are messy and it has led to the suggestion that a defined transfer window, as is used in football, might help to clear up the crossover. However, Bath boss Hooper is happy with the way things are despite the Mercer situation providing an added storyline to this weekend’s last-four encounter.  

“I don’t think so, personally I don’t think so,” he said when asked if rugby needs to alter its player transfer system. “And I don’t have any worries about those guys. There is enough credibility and enough respect between us and them and them and us that they are going to play with everything they have got right up to the moment that they are no longer a Bath player. I’d like to see that remain.

“He has been brilliant,” continued Hooper about Mercer. “That way Zach has developed over the last five, six weeks is a credit to him. He has been so focused on the team and what he can do for the team. He would be disappointed with the way he played at Wasps because he didn’t give the team what they needed so his focus coming into this week has been about how he can give his team what it needs to beat Montpellier. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“He hasn’t looked at it from a ‘oh this is my new team’ point of view. That is something you guys [the media] will tell a story about for sure and rightly so but for him the story is about his teammates here at Bath and how he can leave them with the very best impression of him.”

When the deal with Montpellier broke earlier this year, Mercer said: “It has been a long-standing dream of mine to play in France – the game is physical and will suit my playing style. I feel like I’m able to offer the Top 14 something different and that is what I’m looking forward to. I’ve spent a huge part of my career with Bath and I will be forever grateful for the opportunities this has brought me.

“I found it impossible to say no to the offer of a long-term contract with Montpellier and I’m very grateful to have had respectful and honest conversations every step of the way with Stuart. There is a brilliant group of players and staff at Bath and I know they will go on to achieve great things together.”

BATH: 15. Anthony Watson; 14. Joe Cokanasiga, 13. Jonathan Joseph, 12. Cameron Redpath, 11. Will Muir; 10. Orlando Bailey, 9. Ben Spencer; 1. Juan Schoeman, 2. Tom Dunn, 3. Will Stuart, 4. Josh McNally, 5. Charlie Ewels (capt), 6. Taulupe Faletau, 7. Sam Underhill, 8. Zach Mercer. Reps: 16. Jack Walker , 17. Jamie Bhatti, 18. Henry Thomas, 19. Elliott Stooke, 20. Josh Bayliss, 21. Miles Reid, 22. Will Chudley, 23. Max Clark.

ADVERTISEMENT

MONTPELLIER: 15. Anthony Bouthier; 14. Julien Tisseron, 13. Johan Goosen, 12. Arthur Vincent, 11. Vincent Rattez; 10. Alex Lozowski, 9. Benoit Paillaugue; 1. Enzo Forletta, 2. Guilhem Guirado (capt), 3. Mohamed Haouas, 4. Florian Verhaeghe, 5. Paul Willemse, 6. Nico Janse van Rensburg, 7. Yacouba Camara, 8. Alexandre Becognee. Reps: 16. Bismarck Du Plessis, 17. Grégory Fichten, 18. Titi Lamositele, 19. Tyler Duguid, 20. Fulgence Ouedraogo, 21. Cobus Reinach, 22. Handré Pollard, 23. Vincent Martin.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search