Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What England made of having three 10s on the pitch at the same time

(Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images)

England boss Steve Borthwick has declared that the presence of three No10s in his backline at the same time brought another dimension to his team on Saturday in Lille.

ADVERTISEMENT

The English played the final 30 minutes of their 71-0 thrashing of minnows Chile with Marcus Smith at full-back and Owen Farrell switched out one channel to inside centre following the introduction of George Ford off the bench.

Seven tries had already been scored when the three-10s tactic was deployed and although only four more tries followed in a closing half-hour affected by a run of penalties, it still included the sight of Ford looping onto a pass and smartly delaying his transfer to enable the try-scoring Smith to be in the perfect position to take the chance.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

That move provided a glimpse as to what England – who had five tries alone from winger Henry Arundell – can do when they opt to put the ball through the hands rather than deluge the opposition with a kick-dominated display, as was the case in their previous World Cup pools wins over Argentina and Japan.

It left Borthwick signing off on September with a three-from-three record in a campaign that will resume on October 7 back in Lille versus Samoa and judging by his post-game remarks, the impact made by the two-try in his first outing with the No15 shirt on his back didn’t go unnoticed by the head coach.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
4.4
16
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
0
7
Entries

“He did a lot of very good things and there was a lot of exciting talent in the pitch,” said Borthwick. “As I have been saying for quite a long period now, this squad is packed full of talent and is packed full of different options and you saw that today.

“The starting configuration did a really good job of working through a challenging spell (of 0-0 until the 20th minute) and to be able to change that in the game to then have Owen, George and Marcus on the pitch brought another dimension. It certainly gives options for the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Playing 15 there is a different amount of space there than playing at 10 and the job of the players on the inside is to hold the defence to make sure there is space for the guys on the outside, and I thought he did that very well.

“The way Marcus took those opportunities, found the space and helped link with Henry, in particular, was a positive and what it shows is a lot of hard work of everybody on the training field.

“Players have been working for a long period for the opportunity to go and represent England in this World Cup and they are building well. We’ll progress. There is plenty of work to do but the team is going to get sharper and keep building from a fitness perspective.”

Saturday was skipper Farrell’s first outing since his August 12 red card against Wales resulted in a four-game ban. He was given the start at No10, with Borthwick deciding to hold Ford in reserve on this occasion after man of the match awards against the Pumas and the Japanese.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, while he was pleased with how it unfolded, he was wary about overegging the merit of having three 10s in the England backline at the same time. “It’s already been made out into something it’s probably not,” he deflected.

“It’s a whole team effort. For a team to score tries out wide, everybody has got a job to do and I’m talking about all 15. You’re picking out three players in the 15, it doesn’t work like that.

Related

“I thought Marcus did a good job of talking where the space was, I thought George when he came on moved the ball well when it was on.

“But you have to give a lot of credit to the lads who were in the middle and the forwards who did a lot of work when it came to set-piece time and mauling and scrummaging and making sure that we were dominant in those areas but then holding people on the inside and being a real threat through the middle which allowed people like Henry to score on the outside.

“I enjoyed being out there and I thought Marcus played really well, looked dangerously constantly as he normally does. All I can say is I enjoyed it, I thought Marcus played really well and George added when he came on as well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 49 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search