Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What Exeter can expect from Jake White's Bulls selection

Bulls Sibongile Novuka (R) celebrates with teammates after scoring a try during the European Champions Cup pool A rugby union match between Bulls and Lyon at Loftus Versfeld Stadium in Pretoria on December 10, 2022. (Photo by Phill Magakoe / AFP) /

The Bulls head off to England on Tuesday for the next assignment on their European Cup journey, where they will face former champions Exeter Chiefs at Sandy Park on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

European champions in the 2019-2020 season and twice Premiership champions, the Chiefs started with an impressive 27-12 away win over Castres this past weekend.

In contrast, the Bulls – fielding very much a back-up team – had to hang on desperately against a hard-charging Lyon for a bonus-point 42-36 win at Loftus Versfeld.

Video Spacer

WATCH as the Bulls’ Director of Rugby Jake White reveals plans to split his squad for the Euro trip and URC

Video Spacer

WATCH as the Bulls’ Director of Rugby Jake White reveals plans to split his squad for the Euro trip and URC

Injuries and a pre-planned selection policy will further complicate matters for the Bulls.

However, lock Jacques du Plessis – just back from a long-term Achilles injury – has suffered a suspected hand fracture.

“It is a massive loss for us,” Bulls Director of Rugby Jake White said.

Seasoned utility back Marco Jansen van Vuren also suffered a patella injury that could rule him out of the trip to Exeter.

White is ‘splitting’ his squad, with a group heading off to Exeter and the rest staying home to prepare for the December 23 URC encounter with the Stormers in Cape Town.

That means there is set to be a substantial number of the players who edge a hard-charging Lyon 42-36 in Pretoria at the weekend on the flight to England.

ADVERTISEMENT

Part of the reason for that is player management.

As per the collective agreement with the players’ union, MyPlayers, they are only allowed to play 32 games a year.

That means Springboks who featured in most of the 13 internationals this year, are left with a lot less ‘wiggle room’ in other competitions – such as the United Rugby Championship and European Cup.

Related

“We are fortunate that we don’t have too many players who played a lot of Tests,” the Bulls boss told @rugby365com.

ADVERTISEMENT

White reiterated that they take the Currie Cup very seriously and still regard it as a “premier competition in South Africa” and need a substantial number of frontline players available for that as well.

“There is no way the same group of players can play in the Currie Cup, URC and EPCR [Europe],” he said.

“You could get to the back end of a competition where [suddenly] you can’t play them.

“I have worked a plan out,” he said about the balancing act of not giving some players too many games early in a competition, adding that he is “going to stick to it”

“The plan is clear and the players have bought into it.

“Barring injuries, I am going to try and get two teams that are competitive and can win.”

Related

He said the youngsters who featured in the win over Lyon at the weekend have put up their hands for many more ‘big’ games.

“You have guys knocking the door down to play in the frontline selection,” White said, adding: “We are in a good place.”

The Bulls’ Director of Rugby said the challenge is now to see if they can also play well away from home.

Having held off last season’s Challenge Cup winners, Lyon, at Loftus Versfeld this past weekend, they will be looking to get more points on the road in the drive for a place in the last 16 in Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search