Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

What Jamie Roberts would do to fix Wayne Pivac's struggling Wales

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Former Wales midfielder Jamie Roberts has identified what Wales need to do in the Autumn Nations Cup to snap their worrying five-game losing streak under Wayne Pivac – keep changes to a minimum and start winning collisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales’ run of form left them beaten by Scotland last Saturday in Llanelli and consigned to a desultory fifth place Six Nations finish 19 months after they won the Grand Slam in Warren Gatland’s final championship.

Gatland went on to guide Wales to a fourth-place finish at the World Cup in Japan last November but they have struggled since Pivac took charge, a Cardiff win over Italy in February being followed by defeats to Ireland, France, England, France and the Scots.

Video Spacer

Jamie Roberts and Dylan Hartley co-host the latest episode of RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

Jamie Roberts and Dylan Hartley co-host the latest episode of RugbyPass Offload

They next face Ireland in Dublin on November 13 and while disgruntled fans are heaping criticism on Pivac, Roberts has outlined his quick-fix solutions that can get Wales back firing again.

Appearing as co-host on the latest episode of RugbyPass Offload, Roberts said: “I don’t see him [Pivac] making too many changes. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the likes of Callum Sheedy, Ioan Lloyd given the opportunity but around an experienced core of players.

“He probably needs to role the dice a little bit with some younger players. I don’t think the core of the squad will change. There are some wonderful, established, experienced international players there to do the job for Wales who haven’t had too much rugby.

“So over the next six weeks, hopefully we will see those players back fully fit and fully firing because they weren’t good last week against Scotland. It was a poor performance admittedly from the lads and they need to change that run of form pretty quickly.

ADVERTISEMENT

“They are going to put more width on the game, there is no doubt about that. Teams that Wayne Pivac has coached in the past, they want to put width on the game, they want to keep athletic back rowers in those 15-metre channels to give them opportunities on the ball in space.

“The problem for Wales at the minute revolves around the collisions and contact area, they just got no change there from Scotland who were brilliant. It’s the only time since I started playing Test rugby and since then that I was quite apprehensive about Scotland coming to Wales,” continued Roberts.

“The last time Scotland won in Wales was 2002 and before the match I just had this sneaky feeling. I thought Wales would win but just in the back of my mind, just the quality that Scotland have built over the last couple of seasons and what Gregor has built there, I was a little bit nervous and unfortunately that became reality.

“Wayne wants to add a bit more width to the game, they want to play with pace and utilise the skillset of the players. However, in the northern hemisphere, the weather tends to be wet, the pitches heavy and when you come up against linespeed, you can’t do that unless you win collisions, get quick ball and you go forward.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Wales just at the minute are not doing that. In the contact area it wasn’t good enough at the weekend and they will be looking to right those wrongs looking into the Ireland game because Ireland, probably more than any team, come after that contact area.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 41 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

152 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

152 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu suffers new injury setback Springboks flyhalf's latest injury worry
Search